IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v68y2014icp989-997.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of different fuel options on performance of high-temperature PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) systems

Author

Listed:
  • Authayanun, Suthida
  • Saebea, Dang
  • Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn
  • Arpornwichanop, Amornchai

Abstract

High-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells (HT-PEMFCs) have received substantial attention due to their high CO (carbon monoxide) tolerance and simplified water management. The hydrogen and CO fractions affect the HT-PEMFC performance and different fuel sources for hydrogen production result in different product gas compositions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the theoretical performance of HT-PEMFCs fueled by the reformate gas derived from various fuel options (i.e., methane, methanol, ethanol, and glycerol). Effects of fuel types and CO poisoning on the HT-PEMFC performance are analyzed. Furthermore, the necessity of a water-gas shift (WGS) reactor as a CO removal unit for pretreating the reformate gas is investigated for each fuel type. The methane steam reforming shows the highest possibility of CO formation, whereas the methanol steam reforming produces the lowest quantity of CO in the reformate gas. The methane fuel processing gives the maximum fraction of hydrogen (≈0.79) when the WGS reactor is included. The most suitable fuel is the one with the lowest CO poisoning effect and the maximum fuel cell performance. It is found that the HT-PEMFC system fueled by methanol without the WGS reactor and methane with WGS reactor shows the highest system efficiency (≈50%).

Suggested Citation

  • Authayanun, Suthida & Saebea, Dang & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2014. "Effect of different fuel options on performance of high-temperature PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 989-997.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:68:y:2014:i:c:p:989-997
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544214002461
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bénédicte Vidaillet & V. d'Estaintot & P. Abécassis, 2005. "Introduction," Post-Print hal-00287137, HAL.
    2. Leo, T.J. & Durango, J.A. & Navarro, E., 2010. "Exergy analysis of PEM fuel cells for marine applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1164-1171.
    3. Lopes, Daniel G. & da Silva, E.P. & Pinto, C.S. & Neves, N.P. & Camargo, J.C. & Ferreira, P.F.P. & Furlan, A.L. & Lopes, Davi G., 2012. "Technical and economic analysis of a power supply system based on ethanol reforming and PEMFC," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 205-212.
    4. Authayanun, Suthida & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Comparison of high-temperature and low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems with glycerol reforming process for stationary applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 192-201.
    5. Chutichai, Bhawasut & Authayanun, Suthida & Assabumrungrat, Suttichai & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Performance analysis of an integrated biomass gasification and PEMFC (proton exchange membrane fuel cell) system: Hydrogen and power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 98-106.
    6. Chen, Haisheng & Ding, Yulong & Cong, Ngoc T. & Dou, Binlin & Dupont, Valerie & Ghadiri, Mojtaba & Williams, Paul T., 2011. "A comparative study on hydrogen production from steam-glycerol reforming: thermodynamics and experimental," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 779-788.
    7. Ouzounidou, Martha & Ipsakis, Dimitris & Voutetakis, Spyros & Papadopoulou, Simira & Seferlis, Panos, 2009. "A combined methanol autothermal steam reforming and PEM fuel cell pilot plant unit: Experimental and simulation studies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(10), pages 1733-1743.
    8. Arsalis, Alexandros & Nielsen, Mads P. & Kær, Søren K., 2011. "Modeling and off-design performance of a 1kWe HT-PEMFC (high temperature-proton exchange membrane fuel cell)-based residential micro-CHP (combined-heat-and-power) system for Danish single-family house," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 993-1002.
    9. Oh, Si-Doek & Kim, Ki-Young & Oh, Shuk-Bum & Kwak, Ho-Young, 2012. "Optimal operation of a 1-kW PEMFC-based CHP system for residential applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 93-101.
    10. Xing, Lei & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith, 2013. "A two dimensional agglomerate model for a proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 196-210.
    11. Manoj Kumar, P. & Parthasarathy, V., 2013. "A passive method of water management for an air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 457-461.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lei, Gang & Zheng, Hualin & Zhang, Jun & Siong Chin, Cheng & Xu, Xinhai & Zhou, Weijiang & Zhang, Caizhi, 2023. "Analyzing characteristic and modeling of high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells with CO poisoning effect," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Chen, Ben & Cai, Yonghua & Yu, Yi & Wang, Jun & Tu, Zhengkai & Chan, Siew Hwa, 2017. "Gas purging effect on the degradation characteristic of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with dead-ended mode operation II. Under different operation pressures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 50-57.
    3. Zhang, Caizhi & Liu, Zhitao & Zhou, Weijiang & Chan, Siew Hwa & Wang, Youyi, 2015. "Dynamic performance of a high-temperature PEM fuel cell – An experimental study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P2), pages 1949-1955.
    4. Chen, Ben & Cai, Yonghua & Tu, Zhengkai & Chan, Siew Hwa & Wang, Jun & Yu, Yi, 2017. "Gas purging effect on the degradation characteristic of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell with dead-ended mode operation I. With different electrolytes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 40-49.
    5. Ribeirinha, P. & Alves, I. & Vázquez, F. Vidal & Schuller, G. & Boaventura, M. & Mendes, A., 2017. "Heat integration of methanol steam reformer with a high-temperature polymeric electrolyte membrane fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 468-477.
    6. Guo, Xinru & Zhang, Houcheng & Yuan, Jinliang & Wang, Jiatang & Zhao, Jiapei & Wang, Fu & Miao, He & Hou, Shujin, 2019. "Performance assessment of a combined system consisting of a high-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell and a thermoelectric generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 762-770.
    7. Singdeo, Debanand & Dey, Tapobrata & Gaikwad, Shrihari & Andreasen, Søren Juhl & Ghosh, Prakash C., 2017. "A new modified-serpentine flow field for application in high temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cell," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 13-22.
    8. Yu, Bor-Chern & Wang, Yi-Chun & Lu, Hsin-Chun & Lin, Hsiu-Li & Shih, Chao-Ming & Kumar, S. Rajesh & Lue, Shingjiang Jessie, 2017. "Hydroxide-ion selective electrolytes based on a polybenzimidazole/graphene oxide composite membrane," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 802-812.
    9. Hyunyong Lee & Inchul Jung & Gilltae Roh & Youngseung Na & Hokeun Kang, 2020. "Comparative Analysis of On-Board Methane and Methanol Reforming Systems Combined with HT-PEM Fuel Cell and CO 2 Capture/Liquefaction System for Hydrogen Fueled Ship Application," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Authayanun, Suthida & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2013. "Comparison of high-temperature and low-temperature polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems with glycerol reforming process for stationary applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 192-201.
    2. Authayanun, Suthida & Saebea, Dang & Patcharavorachot, Yaneeporn & Arpornwichanop, Amornchai, 2015. "Evaluation of an integrated methane autothermal reforming and high-temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 331-339.
    3. Gabriele Loreti & Andrea Luigi Facci & Stefano Ubertini, 2021. "High-Efficiency Combined Heat and Power through a High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell and Gas Turbine Hybrid System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-24, November.
    4. Víctor Sanz i López & Ramon Costa-Castelló & Carles Batlle, 2022. "Literature Review of Energy Management in Combined Heat and Power Systems Based on High-Temperature Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells for Residential Comfort Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Yuan, Zhenyu & Zhang, Yufeng & Fu, Wenting & Li, Zipeng & Liu, Xiaowei, 2013. "Investigation of a small-volume direct methanol fuel cell stack for portable applications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 462-467.
    6. Salemme, Lucia & Menna, Laura & Simeone, Marino, 2013. "Calculation of the energy efficiency of fuel processor – PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell systems from fuel elementar composition and heating value," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 368-374.
    7. Lu, Chia-Lien & Chang, Cheng-Ping & Guo, Yi-Hsuan & Yeh, Tsung-Kuang & Su, Yu-Chuan & Wang, Pen-Cheng & Hsueh, Kan-Lin & Tseng, Fan-Gang, 2019. "High-performance and low-leakage phosphoric acid fuel cell with synergic composite membrane stacking of micro glass microfiber and nano PTFE," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 982-988.
    8. Wang, Shengnan & Li, Yunhua & Li, Yun-Ze & Peng, Xing & Mao, Yufeng, 2018. "Exergy based parametric analysis of a cooling and power co-generation system for the life support system of extravehicular spacesuits," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1209-1219.
    9. Zhang, Xiaofeng & Liu, Wenjing & Pan, Jinjun & Zhao, Bin & Yi, Zhengyuan & He, Xu & Liu, Yuting & Li, Hongqiang, 2024. "Comprehensive performance assessment of a novel biomass-based CCHP system integrated with SOFC and HT-PEMFC," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    10. Li, Dazi & Yu, Yadi & Jin, Qibing & Gao, Zhiqiang, 2014. "Maximum power efficiency operation and generalized predictive control of PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 210-217.
    11. Xing, Lei & Das, Prodip K. & Song, Xueguan & Mamlouk, Mohamed & Scott, Keith, 2015. "Numerical analysis of the optimum membrane/ionomer water content of PEMFCs: The interaction of Nafion® ionomer content and cathode relative humidity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 242-257.
    12. Hajjaji, Noureddine & Chahbani, Amna & Khila, Zouhour & Pons, Marie-Noëlle, 2014. "A comprehensive energy–exergy-based assessment and parametric study of a hydrogen production process using steam glycerol reforming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 473-483.
    13. van Dijk, Dick & Hans Franses, Philip & Peter Boswijk, H., 2007. "Absorption of shocks in nonlinear autoregressive models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4206-4226, May.
    14. Karaman Örsal, Deniz Dilan & Droge, Bernd, 2014. "Panel cointegration testing in the presence of a time trend," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 377-390.
    15. Biqing Cai & Jiti Gao & Dag Tjøstheim, 2017. "A New Class of Bivariate Threshold Cointegration Models," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 288-305, April.
    16. Ignacio Lozano Espitia & Karen Rodríguez, 2009. "Assessing the Macroeconomic Effects of Fiscal," Borradores de Economia 5386, Banco de la Republica.
    17. Christian Kascha, 2012. "A Comparison of Estimation Methods for Vector Autoregressive Moving-Average Models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(3), pages 297-324.
    18. Robert Lehmann & Antje Weyh, 2016. "Forecasting Employment in Europe: Are Survey Results Helpful?," Journal of Business Cycle Research, Springer;Centre for International Research on Economic Tendency Surveys (CIRET), vol. 12(1), pages 81-117, September.
    19. Brüggemann, Ralf & Jentsch, Carsten & Trenkler, Carsten, 2016. "Inference in VARs with conditional heteroskedasticity of unknown form," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 191(1), pages 69-85.
    20. Harald Schmidbauer & Angi Roesch & Erhan Uluceviz, 2013. "Market Connectedness: Spillovers, Information Flow, and Relative Market Entropy," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1320, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:68:y:2014:i:c:p:989-997. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.