IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/energy/v346y2026ics0360544226003877.html

Methanol production technology development pathways under multi-agent stochastic evolutionary game: a complex network perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Bo
  • Zhang, Chuan
  • Song, Xuehang
  • Liu, Shuang
  • Duan, Yu
  • Nie, Hongdi
  • Luo, Wenbo
  • Wei, Wei
  • Sun, Nannan

Abstract

The low-carbon transformation of the methanol industry is a pivotal issue under the global carbon neutrality drive. This study proposes an integrated analytical framework combining stochastic disturbance, dynamic game and multidimensional analysis, and develops a tripartite stochastic evolutionary game model (government, fossil-based methanol producer (FMP), renewable methanol producer (RMP)) within a complex network framework to analyze the low-carbon transition of the methanol industry under carbon neutrality. Using Gaussian noise to simulate policy shocks and two-dimensional Monte Carlo simulation, the study traces technology evolution from 2025 to 2055. Results show a three-stage transition pattern under symmetric conditions: policy response, industrial adjustment and stable development period, with government carbon tax strategies playing a central guiding role at an adoption proportion of approximately 98%; while asymmetric settings cause bifurcation, highlighting the importance of initial technological configuration. System resilience is nonlinearly influenced by noise intensity, and stochastic disturbances accelerate technology adoption by altering risk preferences—specifically, FMP's CTM adoption proportion decreases from 16.56% to 8.41%, while RMP's CHTM adoption proportion declines from 16.55% to 8.91%. Government revenue grows consistently—rising from 1.57 × 1016 USD to 4.92 × 1016 USD, FMP revenue declines—from −7.51 × 109 USD to −1.72 × 1010 USD, and RMP revenue shifts from negative to positive—surging from −4.11 × 109 USD to 3.45 × 1010 USD, demonstrating the role of technological learning and scale effects. Tornado diagrams identify key evolving drivers—FMP output coefficient declines from 16545.70 to 10544.76 (2025–2035), whereas RMP counterpart increases from 1272.38 to 21064.34 (2045–2055), offering a quantitative foundation for policy and pathway selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Bo & Zhang, Chuan & Song, Xuehang & Liu, Shuang & Duan, Yu & Nie, Hongdi & Luo, Wenbo & Wei, Wei & Sun, Nannan, 2026. "Methanol production technology development pathways under multi-agent stochastic evolutionary game: a complex network perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003877
    DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2026.140285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544226003877
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.energy.2026.140285?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qi, Shaozhou & Cheng, Shihan & Tan, Xiujie & Feng, Shenghao & Zhou, Qi, 2022. "Predicting China's carbon price based on a multi-scale integrated model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 324(C).
    2. Bugalia, Nikhil & Maemura, Yu & Dasari, Rohit & Patidar, Manoj, 2023. "A system dynamics model for effective management strategies of High-Speed Railway (HSR) projects involving private sector participation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Deger Saygin & Dolf Gielen, 2021. "Zero-Emission Pathway for the Global Chemical and Petrochemical Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-28, June.
    4. Althouse, Jeffrey & Cahen-Fourot, Louison & Carballa-Smichowski, Bruno & Durand, Cédric & Knauss, Steven, 2023. "Ecologically unequal exchange and uneven development patterns along global value chains," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Shobande, Olatunji A. & Ogbeifun, Lawrence & Tiwari, Aviral Kumar, 2024. "Extricating the impacts of emissions trading system and energy transition on carbon intensity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    6. Teng, Minmin & Lv, Kunfeng & Han, Chuanfeng & Liu, Pihui, 2025. "A tripartite stochastic evolutionary game for trading strategies under renewable portfolio standards in China’s electric power industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Harris, Kylee & Grim, R. Gary & Huang, Zhe & Tao, Ling, 2021. "A comparative techno-economic analysis of renewable methanol synthesis from biomass and CO2: Opportunities and barriers to commercialization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    8. Martin A. Nowak & Akira Sasaki & Christine Taylor & Drew Fudenberg, 2004. "Emergence of cooperation and evolutionary stability in finite populations," Nature, Nature, vol. 428(6983), pages 646-650, April.
    9. Samuel Simon Araya & Vincenzo Liso & Xiaoti Cui & Na Li & Jimin Zhu & Simon Lennart Sahlin & Søren Højgaard Jensen & Mads Pagh Nielsen & Søren Knudsen Kær, 2020. "A Review of The Methanol Economy: The Fuel Cell Route," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    10. Liao, Dongsheng & Tan, Binbin, 2023. "An evolutionary game analysis of new energy vehicles promotion considering carbon tax in post-subsidy era," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    11. Chen, Wenjing & Xu, Xingtang & Cheng, Haoran & Feng, Jie & Li, Wen-Ying, 2025. "Sustainable methanol production processes from coal and biomass: Low CO2 emissions and high efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 330(C).
    12. Yunfei Du & Xinwei Shen & Daniel M. Kammen & Xiaochi Ding, 2025. "Cost-competitive offshore wind-powered green methanol production for maritime transport decarbonization," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Zhao, Yuntong & Du, Yushen, 2021. "Technical standard competition: An ecosystem-view analysis based on stochastic evolutionary game theory," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Laura Chiaramonte & Alberto Dreassi & Claudia Girardone & Stefano Piserà, 2022. "Do ESG strategies enhance bank stability during financial turmoil? Evidence from Europe," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(12), pages 1173-1211, August.
    15. Wang, Bo & Gong, Siyu & Yang, Yang, 2024. "Unveiling the relation between digital technology and low-carbon innovation: Carbon emission trading policy as an antecedent," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    16. Savelli, Iacopo & Hardy, Jeffrey & Hepburn, Cameron & Morstyn, Thomas, 2022. "Putting wind and solar in their place: Internalising congestion and other system-wide costs with enhanced contracts for difference in Great Britain," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    17. R. Frömer & H. Lin & C. K. Dean Wolf & M. Inzlicht & A. Shenhav, 2021. "Expectations of reward and efficacy guide cognitive control allocation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Zhehao Huang & Benhuan Nie & Yuqiao Lan & Changhong Zhang, 2025. "A Decomposition-Integration Framework of Carbon Price Forecasting Based on Econometrics and Machine Learning Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    19. Mohit Goswami & Saurabh Pratap & S.K. Kumar, 2016. "An integrated Bayesian-Game theoretic approach for product portfolio planning of a multi-attributed product in a duopolistic market," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(23), pages 6997-7013, December.
    20. Wang, Wei & Cai, Guanghui & Tao, Xiangxing, 2021. "Pricing geometric asian power options in the sub-fractional brownian motion environment," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    21. Du, Yida & Li, Xiangguang & Tan, Caixia & Tan, Zhongfu, 2024. "Two-stage multi-objective distributionally robust operation optimization and benefits equalization of an off-grid type electric-hydrogen-ammonia-methanol coupling system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    22. Blichfeldt, Henrik & Faullant, Rita, 2021. "Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation – A process-industry perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    23. Shuai Nie & Guotian Cai & Yixuan Li & Yushu Chen & Ruxue Bai & Liping Gao & Xiaoyu Chen, 2022. "To Adopt CCU Technology or Not? An Evolutionary Game between Local Governments and Coal-Fired Power Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    24. Feng, Jian & Yao, Yifan & Liu, Zhenfeng & Liu, Zhenling, 2024. "Electric vehicle charging stations' installing strategies: Considering government subsidies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 370(C).
    25. R. Boucekkine & F. Prieur & W. Ruan & B. Zou, 2024. "Uncertainty-driven symmetry-breaking and stochastic stability in a generic differential game of lobbying," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 77(4), pages 1127-1171, June.
    26. Jiarong Li & Jin Lin & Jianxiao Wang & Xi Lu & Chris P. Nielsen & Michael B. McElroy & Yonghua Song & Jie Song & Xuefeng Lyu & Mingkai Yu & Sirui Wu & Zhipeng Yu, 2025. "Redesigning electrification of China’s ammonia and methanol industry to balance decarbonization with power system security," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 10(6), pages 762-773, June.
    27. Cheng, Zhen & Ding, Chante Jian & Zhao, Kunqian, 2025. "Energy use rights trading and carbon emissions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    28. Zhang, Bo & Song, Xuehang & Zhang, Chuan & Wei, Wei & Sun, Nannan, 2025. "An energy storage roadmap study incorporating government subsidies based on a combined tripartite evolutionary game and Monte Carlo simulation approach: evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 331(C).
    29. Clara McDonnell & Joyeeta Gupta, 2024. "Beyond divest vs. engage: a review of the role of institutional investors in an inclusive fossil fuel phase-out," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 314-331, March.
    30. Alilou, Masoud & Shotorbani, Amin Mohammadpour & Mohammadi-Ivatloo, Behnam, 2025. "Lyapunov-based real-time optimization method in microgrids: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    31. Wen, Shiyan & Jia, Zhijie, 2022. "The energy, environment and economy impact of coal resource tax, renewable investment, and total factor productivity growth," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    32. Chen, Fubin & Yang, Zhao & Wang, Yiping & He, Hongxia & Zhang, Yong & Zhao, Yanfeng, 2025. "Comprehensive economic, environmental and social benefit assessment for refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment combined with the social cost of carbon," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    33. Che, Shuai & Tao, Miaomiao & Silva, Emilson & Sheng, Mingyue Selena & Zhao, Congyu & Wang, Jun, 2024. "Financial misallocation and green innovation efficiency: China's firm-level evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    34. Erzo F. P. Luttmer & Andrew A. Samwick, 2018. "The Welfare Cost of Perceived Policy Uncertainty: Evidence from Social Security," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 108(2), pages 275-307, February.
    35. Wu, Zhicong & Xu, Gang & Huang, Ziqi & Ge, Shiyu & Chen, Heng, 2024. "An efficient carbon-neutral power and methanol polygeneration system based on biomass decarbonization and CO2 hydrogenation: Thermodynamic and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    36. Yuskevich, Ilya & Smirnova, Ksenia & Vingerhoeds, Rob & Golkar, Alessandro, 2021. "Model-based approaches for technology planning and roadmapping: Technology forecasting and game-theoretic modeling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jiaxuan & Zhu, Xun & Djilali, Ned & Yang, Yang & Ye, Dingding & Chen, Rong & Liao, Qiang, 2022. "Comparative well-to-pump assessment of fueling pathways for zero-carbon transportation in China: Hydrogen economy or methanol economy?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Li, Yuhang & Yang, Ruixin & Long, Yan & Zhou, Xiafeng, 2025. "Investigation of the SO2 capture and iodine-sulfur cycle for H2-H2SO4-electricity-heat polygeneration system based on spectral splitting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    3. Zhang, Zhong & Li, Sheng & Yang, Hao, 2026. "A novel methanol and electricity cogeneration system based on coal and biomass complementary gasification technology: Comprehensive analysis of thermodynamic, carbon emission, and economic performance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    4. Chen, Yunong & Belmonte, Andrew & Griffin, Christopher, 2021. "Imitation of success leads to cost of living mediated fairness in the Ultimatum Game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 583(C).
    5. Xu, Chong & Tao, Miaomiao & Qi, Lingli & Roubaud, David, 2025. "Can green CEOs trigger the green premium effect?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Martin A. Hubbe, 2023. "Sustainable Composites: A Review with Critical Questions to Guide Future Initiatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-18, July.
    7. Xinpeng Gao & Sufeng Li, 2025. "A Dynamic Evolution and Spatiotemporal Convergence Analysis of the Coordinated Development Between New Quality Productive Forces and China’s Carbon Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Sergio Currarini & Carmen Marchiori & Alessandro Tavoni, 2016. "Network Economics and the Environment: Insights and Perspectives," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 159-189, September.
    9. Christian Hilbe & Moshe Hoffman & Martin A. Nowak, 2015. "Cooperate without Looking in a Non-Repeated Game," Games, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Masayuki MORIKAWA, 2017. "Impact of Policy Uncertainty on Consumption and Saving Behavior: Evidence from a survey on consumers," Discussion papers 17075, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    11. Rizvi, Syed Kumail Abbas & Rahat, Birjees & Naqvi, Bushra & Umar, Muhammad, 2024. "Revolutionizing finance: The synergy of fintech, digital adoption, and innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    12. Takuya Sekiguchi, 2023. "Fixation Probabilities of Strategies for Trimatrix Games and Their Applications to Triadic Conflict," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 1005-1033, September.
    13. Peterson K. Ozili, 2025. "Reflecting on the Recent Banking Crisis, What Are the New Financial Stability Determinants?," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 54(2), July.
    14. Bello, Piera & Galasso, Vincenzo & Izzo, Alessandro, 2026. "Retirement Under Policy Uncertainty," CEPR Discussion Papers 21344, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. Te Wu & Feng Fu & Long Wang, 2011. "Moving Away from Nasty Encounters Enhances Cooperation in Ecological Prisoner's Dilemma Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-7, November.
    16. Cairo, Sofie & Mahlstedt, Robert, 2021. "Transparency of the Welfare System and Labor Market Outcomes of Unemployed Workers," IZA Discussion Papers 14940, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Gupta, Simran & Chaudhary, Pankaj & Dawar, Varun, 2025. "The amplified impact of ESG on banks with lower funding costs: Insights from G20 economies," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(PC).
    18. Konrad, Kai A. & Morath, Florian, 2020. "The Volunteer’s Dilemma in Finite Populations," CEPR Discussion Papers 15536, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    19. Abuzayed, A. & Pollitt, M. G. & Liebensteiner, M. & Hochgreb, S., 2025. "Exploring the Feasibility of Low-Carbon Fuel Blends in CCGTs for Deep Decarbonization of Power Systems," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2557, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    20. M. Kleshnina & K. Kaveh & K. Chatterjee, 2020. "The role of behavioural plasticity in finite vs infinite populations," Papers 2009.13160, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:energy:v:346:y:2026:i:c:s0360544226003877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.