IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/enepol/v191y2024ics0301421524002209.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical evaluation of the 2022 greenhouse gas mitigation quota in Germany from an environmental economics and policy perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Liepold, Constanze
  • Fabianek, Paul
  • Madlener, Reinhard

Abstract

This study aims at identifying the strengths and weaknesses of the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Quota trading as an alternative to allowance trading and carbon taxes. Information was gathered from the websites and publications of the responsible authorities and relevant legal texts. Moreover, literature on comparable environmental policy instruments was analyzed based on predefined criteria. Assumptions were made to create models for assessing cost effectiveness, Pareto efficiency, and dynamic incentive effects. The results show that the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Quota trading only partially meets the basic criteria of environmental effectiveness, cost effectiveness, and Pareto efficiency, and has further weaknesses regarding legitimacy and practical feasibility. In order to reduce GHG emissions from fossil fuels as efficiently as possible, a key policy priority should therefore be to adapt the Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Quota and to combine it systematically with other environmental economics policies such as a carbon tax.

Suggested Citation

  • Liepold, Constanze & Fabianek, Paul & Madlener, Reinhard, 2024. "A critical evaluation of the 2022 greenhouse gas mitigation quota in Germany from an environmental economics and policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002209
    DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524002209
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:enepol:v:191:y:2024:i:c:s0301421524002209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.