IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v119y2023ics0140988323000221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy

Author

Listed:
  • Antimiani, Alessandro
  • Costantini, Valeria
  • Paglialunga, Elena

Abstract

The complexity of the EU carbon neutrality policy is addressed by evaluating the impacts of the interaction among different policy instruments. An energy-economic dynamic CGE model based on GTAP utilities is developed for simulating different policy scenarios starting from a business as usual case where the economic impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic and recovery measures are included. The instruments tested as part of the EU climate strategy are the removal of fossil-fuel consumption subsidies, a carbon pricing mechanism and the public support to clean energy technologies. The modelling approach is based on a revenue recycling mechanism to finance clean energy technologies. We find that the simultaneous implementation of all instruments under the EU climate strategy including the removal of subsidies to fossil fuels and the reuse of revenues to foster the technological transition of the energy system is a win-win solution for a sustainable and decarbonised EU economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2023. "Fossil fuels subsidy removal and the EU carbon neutrality policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:119:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323000221
    DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106524
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988323000221
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106524?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moerenhout, Tom, 2020. "Trade Impacts of Fossil Fuel Subsidies," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(S1), pages 1-17, July.
    2. repec:cii:cepiie:2014-q4-140-50 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mark Budolfson & Francis Dennig & Frank Errickson & Simon Feindt & Maddalena Ferranna & Marc Fleurbaey & David Klenert & Ulrike Kornek & Kevin Kuruc & Aurélie Méjean & Wei Peng & Noah Scovronick & Dea, 2021. "Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(12), pages 1111-1116, December.
    4. Antoci, Angelo & Borghesi, Simone & Iannucci, Gianluca & Sodini, Mauro, 2021. "Should I stay or should I go? Carbon leakage and ETS in an evolutionary model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Leonidas Paroussos & Antoine Mandel & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Panagiotis Fragkos & Jochen Hinkel & Zoi Vrontisi, 2019. "Climate clubs and the macro-economic benefits of international cooperation on climate policy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(7), pages 542-546, July.
    6. Golub, Alla, 2013. "Analysis of Climate Policies with GDyn-E," Technical Papers 283431, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Jean Fouré & Agnès Bénassy-Quéré & Lionel Fontagné, 2013. "Modelling the world economy at the 2050 horizon," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 21(4), pages 617-654, October.
    8. Jeffrey C Peters, 2016. "GTAP-E-Power: An Electricity-detailed Economy-wide Model," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(2), pages 156-187, December.
    9. Richard Tol, 2013. "Carbon tax: Still the best way forward for climate policy," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(2), pages 70-71, March.
    10. Maksym Chepeliev & Robert McDougall & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2018. "Including Fossil-fuel Consumption Subsidies in the GTAP Data Base," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 3(1), pages 84-121, June.
    11. Jessica Jewell & David McCollum & Johannes Emmerling & Christoph Bertram & David E. H. J. Gernaat & Volker Krey & Leonidas Paroussos & Loïc Berger & Kostas Fragkiadakis & Ilkka Keppo & Nawfal Saadi & , 2018. "Limited emission reductions from fuel subsidy removal except in energy-exporting regions," Nature, Nature, vol. 554(7691), pages 229-233, February.
    12. Brian R. Copeland & M. Scott Taylor, 2004. "Trade, Growth, and the Environment," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(1), pages 7-71, March.
    13. Jakob Skovgaard, 2017. "Erratum to: The devil lies in the definition: competing approaches to fossil fuel subsidies at the IMF and the OECD," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 355-355, June.
    14. Parrado, Ramiro & De Cian, Enrica, 2014. "Technology spillovers embodied in international trade: Intertemporal, regional and sectoral effects in a global CGE framework," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 76-89.
    15. Richard S. J. Tol, 2021. "Europe’s Climate Target for 2050: An Assessment," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 56(6), pages 330-335, November.
    16. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Jean Château & Rob Dellink & Romain Duval & Stéphanie Jamet, 2009. "The Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: How to Build the Necessary Global Action in a Cost-Effective Manner," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 701, OECD Publishing.
    17. Tovar Reaños, Miguel A. & Sommerfeld, Katrin, 2018. "Fuel for inequality: Distributional effects of environmental reforms on private transport," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 28-43.
    18. Wan, Jun & Baylis, Kathy & Mulder, Peter, 2015. "Trade-facilitated technology spillovers in energy productivity convergence processes across EU countries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 253-264.
    19. Hertwich, Edgar G., 2020. "Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995–2012," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Corinne Le Quéré & Robert B. Jackson & Matthew W. Jones & Adam J. P. Smith & Sam Abernethy & Robbie M. Andrew & Anthony J. De-Gol & David R. Willis & Yuli Shan & Josep G. Canadell & Pierre Friedlingst, 2020. "Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 647-653, July.
    21. Giovanni Marin & Antonello Zanfei, 2019. "Does host market regulation induce cross‐border environmental innovation?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(7), pages 2089-2119, July.
    22. Rogge, Karoline S. & Reichardt, Kristin, 2016. "Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1620-1635.
    23. Mr. David Coady & Ian W.H. Parry & Nghia-Piotr Le & Baoping Shang, 2019. "Global Fossil Fuel Subsidies Remain Large: An Update Based on Country-Level Estimates," IMF Working Papers 2019/089, International Monetary Fund.
    24. Böhringer, Christoph & Keller, Andreas & Bortolamedi, Markus & Rahmeier Seyffarth, Anelise, 2016. "Good things do not always come in threes: On the excess cost of overlapping regulation in EU climate policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 502-508.
    25. Ramiro Parrado & Francesco Bosello & Elisa Delpiazzo & Jochen Hinkel & Daniel Lincke & Sally Brown, 2020. "Fiscal effects and the potential implications on economic growth of sea-level rise impacts and coastal zone protection," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 283-302, May.
    26. Mark Budolfson & Francis Dennig & Frank Errickson & Simon Feindt & Maddalena Ferranna & Marc Fleurbaey & David Klenert & Ulrike Kornek & Kevin Kuruc & Aurélie Méjean & Wei Peng & Noah Scovronick & Dea, 2021. "Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03462773, HAL.
    27. Golombek, Rolf & Greaker, Mads & Hoel, Michael, 2020. "Should environmental R&D be prioritized?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    28. Mr. Jiaqian Chen & Maksym Chepeliev & Mr. Daniel Garcia-Macia & Ms. Dora M Iakova & Mr. James Roaf & Ms. Anna Shabunina & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe & Mr. Philippe Wingender, 2020. "EU Climate Mitigation Policy," IMF Departmental Papers / Policy Papers 2020/013, International Monetary Fund.
    29. Xiang, Hongjin & Kuang, Yanxiang, 2020. "Who benefits from China’s coal subsidy policies? A computable partial equilibrium analysis," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    30. Corradini, Massimiliano & Costantini, Valeria & Markandya, Anil & Paglialunga, Elena & Sforna, Giorgia, 2018. "A dynamic assessment of instrument interaction and timing alternatives in the EU low-carbon policy mix design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 73-84.
    31. Gerlagh, Reyer & Kverndokk, Snorre & Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2014. "The optimal time path of clean energy R&D policy when patents have finite lifetime," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 2-19.
    32. Galinato, Gregmar I. & Yoder, Jonathan K., 2010. "An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 310-326, August.
    33. Monasterolo, Irene & Raberto, Marco, 2019. "The impact of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies on the low-carbon transition," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 355-370.
    34. Mark Budolfson & Francis Dennig & Frank Errickson & Simon Feindt & Maddalena Ferranna & Marc Fleurbaey & David Klenert & Ulrike Kornek & Kevin Kuruc & Aurélie Méjean & Wei Peng & Noah Scovronick & Dea, 2021. "Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being," Post-Print halshs-03462773, HAL.
    35. Jean-Marc Burniaux & Jean Chateau, 2014. "Greenhouse gases mitigation potential and economic efficiency of phasing-out fossil fuel subsidies," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 140, pages 71-88.
    36. Mark Budolfson & Francis Dennig & Frank Errickson & Simon Feindt & Maddalena Ferranna & Marc Fleurbaey & David Klenert & Ulrike Kornek & Kevin Kuruc & Aurélie Méjean & Wei Peng & Noah Scovronick & Dea, 2021. "Climate action with revenue recycling has benefits for poverty, inequality and well-being," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-03462773, HAL.
    37. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2017. "Reviewing, Reforming, and Rethinking Global Energy Subsidies: Towards a Political Economy Research Agenda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 150-163.
    38. Hertwich, Edgar, 2020. "Carbon fueling complex global value chains tripled in the period 1995-2012," SocArXiv zb3rh, Center for Open Science.
    39. Jakob Skovgaard, 2017. "The devil lies in the definition: competing approaches to fossil fuel subsidies at the IMF and the OECD," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 341-353, June.
    40. J. van den Bergh & J. Castro & S. Drews & F. Exadaktylos & J. Foramitti & F. Klein & T. Konc & I. Savin, 2021. "Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 745-764, July.
    41. Ipek Gençsü & Shelagh Whitley & Markus Trilling & Laurie van der Burg & Maeve McLynn & Leah Worrall, 2020. "Phasing out public financial flows to fossil fuel production in Europe," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1010-1023, September.
    42. Chepeliev, Maksym & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2020. "Global fossil-fuel subsidy reform and Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    43. repec:cii:cepiei:2014-q4-140-5 is not listed on IDEAS
    44. Jocelyn Timperley, 2021. "Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill," Nature, Nature, vol. 598(7881), pages 403-405, October.
    45. KERAMIDAS Kimon & FOSSE Florian & DIAZ VAZQUEZ Ana & DOWLING Paul & GARAFFA Rafael & DESPRÉS Jacques & RUSS Hans Peter & SCHADE Burkhard & SCHMITZ Andreas & SORIA RAMIREZ Antonio & VANDYCK Toon & WEIT, 2021. "Global Energy and Climate Outlook 2021: Advancing towards climate neutrality," JRC Research Reports JRC126767, Joint Research Centre.
    46. Catola, Marco & D'Alessandro, Simone, 2020. "Market competition, lobbying influence and environmental externalities," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    47. Angel Aguiar & Maksym Chepeliev & Erwin L. Corong & Robert McDougall & Dominique van der Mensbrugghe, 2019. "The GTAP Data Base: Version 10," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 4(1), pages 1-27, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Miaomiao & Wu, Jun & Chen, Xinyu & Zhu, Xiaoxi, 2023. "Grandfathering or benchmarking? The performance of implementing blockchain technology in a low-carbon supply chain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    2. Zepeng Sun & Yazhuo Wang & Jing Gu & Haoran Yuan & Zejian Liu & Leilei Cheng & Xiang Li & Xian Li, 2023. "CFD Simulation and Experimental Study on a Thermal Energy Storage–Updraft Solid Waste Gasification Device," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-33, June.
    3. Dmytro Osiichuk, 2023. "The Obstacles to the Growth of the Renewable Energy Industry in the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Francois Rozon & Craig McGregor & Michael Owen, 2023. "Long-Term Forecasting Framework for Renewable Energy Technologies’ Installed Capacity and Costs for 2050," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Evans, Olaniyi & Nwaogwugwu, Isaac & Vincent, Olusegun & Wale-Awe, Olawale & Mesagan, Ekundayo & Ojapinwa, Taiwo, 2023. "The socio-economics of the 2023 fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 118360, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Chunhong Liu & Shisong Jiang & Hanfei Zhang & Ziyi Lu & Umberto Desideri, 2024. "China and Italy’s Energy Development Trajectories: Current Landscapes and Future Cooperation Potential," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Ozili, Peterson K, 2023. "Implications of fuel subsidy removal on the Nigerian economy," MPRA Paper 118798, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea M. Bassi & Valeria Costantini & Elena Paglialunga, 2021. "Modelling the European Union Sustainability Transition: A Soft-Linking Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Massimiliano Corradini & Valeria Costantini & Anil Markandya & Elena Paglialunga & Giorgia Sforna, 2018. "Some reflections on policy mix in the EU low-carbon strategy," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0236, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    3. Corradini, Massimiliano & Costantini, Valeria & Markandya, Anil & Paglialunga, Elena & Sforna, Giorgia, 2018. "A dynamic assessment of instrument interaction and timing alternatives in the EU low-carbon policy mix design," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 73-84.
    4. Chepeliev, Maksym & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2020. "Global fossil-fuel subsidy reform and Paris Agreement," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Argueyrolles, Robin & Delzeit, Ruth, 2022. "The interconnections between Fossil Fuel Subsidy Reforms and biofuels," Conference papers 333492, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Fernández-Amador, Octavio & Francois, Joseph F. & Oberdabernig, Doris A. & Tomberger, Patrick, 2023. "Energy footprints and the international trade network: A new dataset. Is the European Union doing it better?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 204(PA).
    7. de Bruin, Kelly & Monaghan, Eoin & Yakut, Aykut Mert, 2019. "The impacts of removing fossil fuel subsidies and increasing carbon tax in Ireland," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS98, June.
    8. Andrea Molocchi, 2021. "Circular Economy and Environmental Sustainability: A Policy Coherence Analysis of Current Italian Subsidies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-38, July.
    9. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline, 2022. "Rendre acceptable la nécessaire taxation du carbone. Quelles pistes pour la France ?," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 15-53.
    10. Birur, Dileep & Lal, Pankaj & Levin, Todd & Zhou, Zhi & Wolde, Bernabas & Wieczerak, Taylor & Thimmapuram, Prakash, 2022. "Fostering Green Economy in New Jersey under the aegis of Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative," Conference papers 333434, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Andrea Marcello Bassi & Georg Pallaske & Richard Bridle & Kavya Bajaj, 2023. "Emission Reduction via Fossil Fuel Subsidy Removal and Carbon Pricing, Creating Synergies with Revenue Recycling," World, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Timilsina, Govinda R. & Deluque Curiel, Ilka Fabiana, 2023. "Subsidy removal, regional trade and CO2 mitigation in the electricity sector in the Middle East and North Africa region," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Harro van Asselt & Kati Kulovesi, 2017. "Seizing the opportunity: tackling fossil fuel subsidies under the UNFCCC," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 357-370, June.
    14. Cecile Couharde & Sara Mouhoud, 2020. "Fossil Fuel Subsidies, Income Inequality, And Poverty: Evidence From Developing Countries," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(5), pages 981-1006, December.
    15. Consoli, Davide & Costantini, Valeria & Paglialunga, Elena, 2023. "We're in this together: Sustainable energy and economic competitiveness in the EU," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(1).
    16. Marginson, Sam, 2020. "Global economic implications of the Nationally Determined Contributions of the Paris Agreement," Conference papers 333164, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Jiang, Zihao & Shi, Jiarong, 2023. "Government intervention and technological innovation in the wind power industry in China: The role of industrial environmental turbulence," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    18. Britz, Wolfgang & Li, Jingwen & Shang, Linmei, 2021. "Combining large-scale sensitivity analysis in Computable General Equilibrium models with Machine Learning: An Example Application to policy supporting the bio-economy," Conference papers 333285, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. Antimiani, Alessandro & Costantini, Valeria & Kuik, Onno & Paglialunga, Elena, 2016. "Mitigation of adverse effects on competitiveness and leakage of unilateral EU climate policy: An assessment of policy instruments," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-259.
    20. Ilaria Fusacchia & Jean Balié & Luca Salvatici, 2022. "The AfCFTA impact on agricultural and food trade: a value added perspective," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 237-284.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Clean energy technologies; Climate policy mix design; EU Green Deal; Fit for 55; Fossil-fuel consumption subsidy removal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:119:y:2023:i:c:s0140988323000221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eneco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.