IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v278y2019i2p629-645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of regulating returns for enhancing the dynamic behaviour of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ponte, Borja
  • Naim, Mohamed M.
  • Syntetos, Aris A.

Abstract

Several studies have determined that product returns positively impact on the dynamics of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems, provided that they are perfectly correlated with demand. By considering imperfect correlation, we observe that intrinsic variations of returns may dramatically deteriorate the operational performance of these closed-loop supply chains. To cope with such added complexity, we propose a structure for controlling the reverse flow through the recoverable stock. The developed mechanism, in the form of a prefilter, is designed to leverage the known positive consequences of the deterministic component of the returns and to buffer the harmful impact of their stochastic component. We show that this outperforms both the benchmark push system and a baseline solution consisting of regulating all the returns. Consequently, we demonstrate that the operation of the production system is greatly smoothed and inventory is better managed. By developing a new framework for measuring the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains, we show that a significant reduction in the net stock, manufacturing, and remanufacturing variances can be achieved, which undoubtedly has implications both for stock reduction and production stabilization. Thus, the known benefits of circular economy models are strengthened, both economically and environmentally.

Suggested Citation

  • Ponte, Borja & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2019. "The value of regulating returns for enhancing the dynamic behaviour of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 629-645.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:2:p:629-645
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2019.04.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037722171930339X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    2. Disney, Stephen M. & Lambrecht, Marc R., 2008. "On Replenishment Rules, Forecasting, and the Bullwhip Effect in Supply Chains," Foundations and Trends(R) in Technology, Information and Operations Management, now publishers, vol. 2(1), pages 1-80, April.
    3. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Disney, Stephen M., 2017. "The impact of product returns and remanufacturing uncertainties on the dynamic performance of a multi-echelon closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 487-502.
    4. Zou, Zong-Bao & Wang, Jian-Jun & Deng, Gui-Shi & Chen, Haozhe, 2016. "Third-party remanufacturing mode selection: Outsourcing or authorization?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-19.
    5. Adenso-Díaz, Belarmino & Moreno, Plácido & Gutiérrez, Ester & Lozano, Sebastián, 2012. "An analysis of the main factors affecting bullwhip in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 917-928.
    6. Genovese, Andrea & Acquaye, Adolf A. & Figueroa, Alejandro & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 344-357.
    7. Towill, Denis R. & Zhou, Li & Disney, Stephen M., 2007. "Reducing the bullwhip effect: Looking through the appropriate lens," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1-2), pages 444-453, July.
    8. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M., 2018. "A unified theory of the dynamics of closed-loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 313-326.
    9. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Towill, Denis R. & Wikner, Joakim, 2016. "A technique to develop simplified and linearised models of complex dynamic supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 888-903.
    10. Xiao-qing Zhang & Xi-gang Yuan, 2016. "The System Dynamics Model in Electronic Products Closed-Loop Supply Chain Distribution Network with Three-Way Recovery and the Old-for-New Policy," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-10, May.
    11. L. Beril Toktay & Lawrence M. Wein & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2000. "Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(11), pages 1412-1426, November.
    12. Tsiliyannis, Christos Aristeides, 2018. "Markov chain modeling and forecasting of product returns in remanufacturing based on stock mean-age," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(2), pages 474-489.
    13. Zhou, Li & Naim, Mohamed M. & Ou Tang & Towill, Denis R., 2006. "Dynamic performance of a hybrid inventory system with a Kanban policy in remanufacturing process," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 585-598, December.
    14. Hau L. Lee & V. Padmanabhan & Seungjin Whang, 1997. "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(4), pages 546-558, April.
    15. Ketzenberg, Michael, 2009. "The value of information in a capacitated closed loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(2), pages 491-503, October.
    16. Wang, Xun & Disney, Stephen M., 2016. "The bullwhip effect: Progress, trends and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 691-701.
    17. Cannella, Salvatore & Bruccoleri, Manfredi & Framinan, Jose M., 2016. "Closed-loop supply chains: What reverse logistics factors influence performance?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 35-49.
    18. Borja Ponte & Xun Wang & David de la Fuente & Stephen M. Disney, 2017. "Exploring nonlinear supply chains: the dynamics of capacity constraints," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(14), pages 4053-4067, July.
    19. Fleischmann, Moritz & Kuik, Roelof, 2003. "On optimal inventory control with independent stochastic item returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 25-37, November.
    20. V. Daniel R. Guide & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2009. "OR FORUM---The Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Research," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 10-18, February.
    21. Hosoda, Takamichi & Disney, Stephen M. & Gavirneni, Srinagesh, 2015. "The impact of information sharing, random yield, correlation, and lead times in closed loop supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 827-836.
    22. Hwarng, H. Brian & Xie, Na, 2008. "Understanding supply chain dynamics: A chaos perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1163-1178, February.
    23. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    24. Dejonckheere, J. & Disney, S. M. & Lambrecht, M. R. & Towill, D. R., 2004. "The impact of information enrichment on the Bullwhip effect in supply chains: A control engineering perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(3), pages 727-750, March.
    25. V. Daniel R. Guide & Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Rajesh Srivastava & W. C. Benton, 2000. "Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 125-142, June.
    26. Disney, S.M. & Towill, D.R., 2005. "Eliminating drift in inventory and order based production control systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 331-344, January.
    27. V. Daniel R. Guide & Terry P. Harrison & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "The Challenge of Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 3-6, December.
    28. Disney, S.M. & Farasyn, I. & Lambrecht, M. & Towill, D.R. & de Velde, W. Van, 2006. "Taming the bullwhip effect whilst watching customer service in a single supply chain echelon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 151-172, August.
    29. De Giovanni, Pietro & Reddy, Puduru V. & Zaccour, Georges, 2016. "Incentive strategies for an optimal recovery program in a closed-loop supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 605-617.
    30. Saurabh Agrawal & Rajesh K. Singh & Qasim Murtaza, 2014. "Forecasting product returns for recycling in Indian electronics industry," Journal of Advances in Management Research, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 102-114, April.
    31. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    32. S Cannella & A P Barbosa-Póvoa & J M Framinan & S Relvas, 2013. "Metrics for bullwhip effect analysis," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(1), pages 1-16, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Dominguez & Borja Ponte & Salvatore Cannella & Jose M. Framinan, 2019. "Building Resilience in Closed-Loop Supply Chains through Information-Sharing Mechanisms," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(23), pages 1-4, November.
    2. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:278:y:2019:i:2:p:629-645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.