IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v30y2000i3p125-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems

Author

Listed:
  • V. Daniel R. Guide

    (A. J. Palumbo School of Business Administration, 920 Rockwell Hall, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15282)

  • Vaidyanathan Jayaraman

    (Department of Management and Systems, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington 98686)

  • Rajesh Srivastava

    (Department of Graduate Logistics Management, Graduate School of Logistics and Acquisition Management, Air Force Institute of Technology WPAFB, Ohio 45433-7765)

  • W. C. Benton

    (Department of Management Science, Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1399)

Abstract

Recoverable manufacturing systems minimize the environmental impact of industry by reusing materials, reducing energy use, and reducing the need to landfill industrial products. These systems are widespread in the United States and are profitable, in addition to contributing to sustainable development. However, the management of supply-chain activities can differ greatly from management activities in traditional manufacturing supply chains. Seven complicating characteristics increase uncertainty. Managers must take actions to reduce uncertainty in the timing and quantity of returns, balance return rates with demand rates, and make material recovery more predictable. Managers must also plan for the collection of products from end-users. The use of information systems with new production-planning and control techniques makes management of these activities more predictable.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Daniel R. Guide & Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Rajesh Srivastava & W. C. Benton, 2000. "Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 125-142, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:30:y:2000:i:3:p:125-142
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.30.3.125.11656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.30.3.125.11656
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guide, V. Daniel R. & Kraus, Mark E. & Srivastava, Rajesh, 1997. "Scheduling policies for remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 187-204, January.
    2. Ayres, Robert & Ferrer, Geraldo & Van Leynseele, Tania, 1997. "Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and remanufacturing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 557-574, October.
    3. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    4. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc & Ridder, Ad, 1996. "An (s, Q) inventory model with remanufacturing and disposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 339-350, December.
    5. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 443-447, August.
    6. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc, 1997. "Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 264-278, October.
    7. V Jayaraman & V D R Guide & R Srivastava, 1999. "A closed-loop logistics model for remanufacturing," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(5), pages 497-508, May.
    8. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc, 1996. "Product remanufacturing and disposal: A numerical comparison of alternative control strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 489-498, August.
    9. Spengler, Th. & Puchert, H. & Penkuhn, T. & Rentz, O., 1997. "Environmental integrated production and recycling management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 308-326, March.
    10. Guide, V. Daniel R. & Srivastava, Rajesh, 1997. "Repairable inventory theory: Models and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 313-324, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renzheng Xue & Fengbin Zhang & Feng Tian, 2018. "A System Dynamics Model to Evaluate Effects of Retailer-Led Recycling Based on Dual Chains Competition: A Case of e-Waste in China," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Dormady, Noah & Roa-Henriquez, Alfredo & Rose, Adam, 2019. "Economic resilience of the firm: A production theory approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 446-460.
    3. Byung Duk Song & Young Dae Ko, 2017. "Effect of Inspection Policies and Residual Value of Collected Used Products: A Mathematical Model and Genetic Algorithm for a Closed-Loop Green Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Chen, Daqiang & Ignatius, Joshua & Sun, Danzhi & Zhan, Shalei & Zhou, Chenyu & Marra, Marianna & Demirbag, Mehmet, 2019. "Reverse logistics pricing strategy for a green supply chain: A view of customers' environmental awareness," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 197-210.
    5. Forlin, Valeria & Scholz, Eva-Maria, 2020. "Strategic take-back programs when consumers have heterogeneous environmental preferences," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Jie Xu & Nan Liu, 2017. "Research on closed loop supply chain with reference price effect," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 51-64, January.
    7. Paul Rowe & Burak Eksioglu & Sandra Eksioglu, 2017. "Recycling procurement strategies with variable yield suppliers," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 249(1), pages 215-234, February.
    8. Chang Fang & Xinbao Liu & Jun Pei & Wenjuan Fan & Panos M. Pardalos, 2016. "Optimal production planning in a hybrid manufacturing and recovering system based on the internet of things with closed loop supply chains," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 543-577, October.
    9. Eleonora Bottani & Maria Carmen Gentilotti & Marta Rinaldi, 2017. "A Fuzzy Logic-Based Tool for the Assessment of Corporate Sustainability: A Case Study in the Food Machinery Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(4), pages 1-29, April.
    10. Hiroko Nakamura & Shinji Suzuki & Tomobe Hironori & Yuya Kajikawa & Ichiro Sakata, 2011. "Citation lag analysis in supply chain research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 87(2), pages 221-232, May.
    11. Anil Jindal & Kuldip Singh Sangwan, 2017. "Multi-objective fuzzy mathematical modelling of closed-loop supply chain considering economical and environmental factors," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 257(1), pages 95-120, October.
    12. Hsien-Jen Lin, 2015. "Two-echelon stochastic inventory system with returns and partial backlogging," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(6), pages 966-975, April.
    13. Chang, Jiyoun C. & Graves, Stephen C. & Kirchain, Randolph E. & Olivetti, Elsa A., 2019. "Integrated planning for design and production in two-stage recycling operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 535-547.
    14. Jian Yang & Boaz Golany & Gang Yu, 2005. "A concave‐cost production planning problem with remanufacturing options," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 443-458, August.
    15. Ponte, Borja & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2019. "The value of regulating returns for enhancing the dynamic behaviour of hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 278(2), pages 629-645.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:30:y:2000:i:3:p:125-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Matthew Walls). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.