IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ems/eureir/1719.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint

Author

Listed:
  • Bayindir, Z.P.
  • Erkip, N.
  • Gullu, R.

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the profitability of remanufacturing option when the manufactured and remanufactured products are segmented to different markets and the production capacity is finite. It is assumed that remanufactured products can be substituted by the manufactured ones. A single period profit model under substitution is constructed to investigate the system conditions under which remanufacturing is profitable. We present analytical findings and computational results to show profitability of remanufacturing option under substitution policy subject to a capacity constraint of the joint manufacturing/remanufactruing facility.

Suggested Citation

  • Bayindir, Z.P. & Erkip, N. & Gullu, R., 2003. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2003-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1719
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repub.eur.nl/pub/1719/feweco20030708114750.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Qinan & Parlar, Mahmut, 1994. "A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 83-97, July.
    2. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc, 1997. "Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 264-278, October.
    3. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc, 1996. "Product remanufacturing and disposal: A numerical comparison of alternative control strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 489-498, August.
    4. Ayres, Robert & Ferrer, Geraldo & Van Leynseele, Tania, 1997. "Eco-efficiency, asset recovery and remanufacturing," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 15(5), pages 557-574, October.
    5. Richter, Knut & Sombrutzki, Mirko, 2000. "Remanufacturing planning for the reverse Wagner/Whitin models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 304-315, March.
    6. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc & Dekker, Rommert, 1999. "An investigation of lead-time effects in manufacturing/remanufacturing systems under simple PUSH and PULL control strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 195-214, May.
    7. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc & Ridder, Ad, 1996. "An (s, Q) inventory model with remanufacturing and disposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 339-350, December.
    8. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 313-324, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Z P Bayındır & N Erkip & R Güllü, 2005. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 286-296, March.
    2. Bayindir, Z. Pelin & Erkip, Nesim & Gullu, Refik, 2003. "A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 597-607, January.
    3. V. Daniel R. Guide & Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Rajesh Srivastava & W. C. Benton, 2000. "Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 125-142, June.
    4. Nenes, George & Panagiotidou, Sofia & Dekker, Rommert, 2010. "Inventory control policies for inspection and remanufacturing of returns: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 300-312, June.
    5. Poles, Roberto, 2013. "System Dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 189-199.
    6. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2011. "An inventory control model with consideration of remanufacturing and product life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 645-652, October.
    7. Kim, Eungab & Saghafian, Soroush & Van Oyen, Mark P., 2013. "Joint control of production, remanufacturing, and disposal activities in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 337-348.
    8. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Kiesmuller, G. P., 2003. "Optimal control of a one product recovery system with leadtimes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 333-340, January.
    10. Ahiska, S. Sebnem & King, Russell E., 2010. "Life cycle inventory policy characterizations for a single-product recoverable system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 51-61, March.
    11. Jian Yang & Boaz Golany & Gang Yu, 2005. "A concave‐cost production planning problem with remanufacturing options," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 443-458, August.
    12. Erwin van der Laan & Marc Salomon & Rommert Dekker & Luk Van Wassenhove, 1999. "Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 733-747, May.
    13. Kaya, Onur, 2010. "Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 442-453, March.
    14. Pinçe, Çerag & Gürler, Ülkü & Berk, Emre, 2008. "A continuous review replenishment-disposal policy for an inventory system with autonomous supply and fixed disposal costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 421-442, October.
    15. Teunter, Ruud H. & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2002. "On the necessity of a disposal option for returned items that can be remanufactured," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 257-266, February.
    16. Richter, Knut & Dobos, Imre, 1999. "Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 463-467, March.
    17. Konstantaras, I. & Papachristos, S., 2007. "Optimal policy and holding cost stability regions in a periodic review inventory system with manufacturing and remanufacturing options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 433-448, April.
    18. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc, 1997. "Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 264-278, October.
    19. Vercraene, Samuel & Gayon, Jean-Philippe & Flapper, Simme Douwe, 2014. "Coordination of manufacturing, remanufacturing and returns acceptance in hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 62-70.
    20. Duong, Quang Huy & Zhou, Li & Meng, Meng & Nguyen, Truong Van & Ieromonachou, Petros & Nguyen, Duy Tiep, 2022. "Understanding product returns: A systematic literature review using machine learning and bibliometric analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ems:eureir:1719. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RePub (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feeurnl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.