IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v59y1999i1-3p463-467.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Richter, Knut
  • Dobos, Imre

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Richter, Knut & Dobos, Imre, 1999. "Analysis of the EOQ repair and waste disposal problem with integer setup numbers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 463-467, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:59:y:1999:i:1-3:p:463-467
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925-5273(98)00110-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 443-447, August.
    2. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc & Ridder, Ad, 1996. "An (s, Q) inventory model with remanufacturing and disposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 339-350, December.
    3. Richter, Knut, 1996. "The EOQ repair and waste disposal model with variable setup numbers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 313-324, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bimal Kumar Mawandiya & J. K. Jha & Jitesh J. Thakkar, 2020. "Optimal production-inventory policy for closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing under random demand and return," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 1623-1664, September.
    2. Byung Duk Song & Young Dae Ko, 2017. "Effect of Inspection Policies and Residual Value of Collected Used Products: A Mathematical Model and Genetic Algorithm for a Closed-Loop Green Manufacturing System," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(9), pages 1-1, September.
    3. van der Laan, Erwin, 2003. "An NPV and AC analysis of a stochastic inventory system with joint manufacturing and remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 317-331, January.
    4. Kovačić, Danijel & Usenik, Janez & Bogataj, Marija, 2017. "Optimal decisions on investments in Urban Energy Cogeneration plants – Extended MRP and fuzzy approach to the stochastic systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PB), pages 583-595.
    5. Miemczyk, Joe, 2008. "An exploration of institutional constraints on developing end-of-life product recovery capabilities," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 272-282, October.
    6. Omar, Mohd & Yeo, Ivan, 2009. "A model for a production-repair system under a time-varying demand process," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(1), pages 17-23, May.
    7. Z P Bayındır & N Erkip & R Güllü, 2005. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 286-296, March.
    8. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2011. "A new lot-sizing heuristic for manufacturing systems with product recovery," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 432-438, September.
    9. Jaber, Mohamad Y. & El Saadany, Ahmed M.A., 2009. "The production, remanufacture and waste disposal model with lost sales," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 115-124, July.
    10. Dobos, Imre & Richter, Knut, 2004. "An extended production/recycling model with stationary demand and return rates," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 311-323, August.
    11. Bayindir, Z. Pelin & Erkip, Nesim & Gullu, Refik, 2003. "A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 597-607, January.
    12. Konstantaras, I. & Papachristos, S., 2007. "Optimal policy and holding cost stability regions in a periodic review inventory system with manufacturing and remanufacturing options," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 433-448, April.
    13. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2015. "Complete solution of the extended EOQ repair and waste disposal model with switching costs," Discussion Papers 376, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    14. Melis Teksan, Z. & Geunes, Joseph, 2016. "An EOQ model with price-dependent supply and demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 22-33.
    15. Ullah, Mehran & Sarkar, Biswajit, 2020. "Recovery-channel selection in a hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing production model with RFID and product quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 360-374.
    16. Dobos, Imre & Gobsch, Barbara & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Pishchulov, Grigory & Richter, Knut, 2011. "A vendor-purchaser economic lot size problem with remanufacturing and deposit," Discussion Papers 304, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.
    17. Omar, Mohd & Yeo, Ivan, 2014. "A production–repair inventory model with time-varying demand and multiple setups," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 398-405.
    18. Joe Miemczyk, 2008. "An exploration of institutional constraints on developing end-of-life product recovery capabilities," Post-Print hal-00765366, HAL.
    19. Kozlovskaya, Nadezhda & Pakhomova, Nadezhda & Richter, Knut, 2016. "A general production and recovery EOQ model with stationary demand and return rates," Discussion Papers 378, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Department of Business Administration and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:59:y:1999:i:1-3:p:463-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Haili He). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.