IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v144y2013i1p189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

System Dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Poles, Roberto

Abstract

Remanufacturing activity views the reverse supply chain of reclaimed goods as integral to the traditional supply chain to the consumer. At the end of the useful life of products, a reverse supply process is activated in which unwanted materials and products are recovered from end users to recapture some of their value. Therefore, planning for the traditional supply chain of goods must take into account the recovered products. Two main processes that need to be considered are inventory control and production planning. In this paper, we model a production and inventory system for remanufacturing using a System Dynamics simulation modelling approach. The aim is to explore the dynamics of the remanufacturing process and to evaluate system improvement strategies. Specifically, the analysis focuses on the effects of capacity planning and lead times on the system which presents push and pull inventory policies driven mainly by the inventory coverage. The research findings reveal efficiency in the remanufacturing process with higher remanufacturing capacity if the quantity of remanufacturable returns and the remanufacturing lead time are increased and decreased respectively. Moreover, an increase of the production lead time has a higher effect on the system performance than an equivalent increase in the remanufacturing lead time. In addition, we provide a case study both to support these findings and to further validate the developed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Poles, Roberto, 2013. "System Dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 189-199.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:144:y:2013:i:1:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527313000704
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.02.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Laan, Erwin A. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2006. "Simple heuristics for push and pull remanufacturing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1084-1102, December.
    2. G P Kiesmüller & S Minner, 2003. "Simple expressions for finding recovery system inventory control parameter values," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(1), pages 83-88, January.
    3. Rainer Kleber, 2006. "Dynamic Inventory Management in Reverse Logistics," Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, number 978-3-540-33230-5, December.
    4. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Kiesmuller, Gudrun P. & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2001. "An inventory model with dependent product demands and returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 73-87, June.
    6. Kiesmuller, G. P., 2003. "A new approach for controlling a hybrid stochastic manufacturing/remanufacturing system with inventories and different leadtimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 62-71, May.
    7. Prahinski, Carol & Kocabasoglu, Canan, 2006. "Empirical research opportunities in reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 519-532, December.
    8. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc & Ridder, Ad, 1996. "An (s, Q) inventory model with remanufacturing and disposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 339-350, December.
    9. Inderfurth, Karl & van der Laan, Erwin, 2001. "Leadtime effects and policy improvement for stochastic inventory control with remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1-3), pages 381-390, May.
    10. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc, 1997. "Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 264-278, October.
    11. Isabelle Huault & V. Perret & S. Charreire-Petit, 2007. "Management," Post-Print halshs-00337676, HAL.
    12. Georgiadis, Patroklos & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2004. "The effect of environmental parameters on product recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 449-464, September.
    13. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc, 1996. "Product remanufacturing and disposal: A numerical comparison of alternative control strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(1-3), pages 489-498, August.
    14. Mitra, Subrata, 2007. "Revenue management for remanufactured products," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 553-562, October.
    15. Erwin van der Laan & Marc Salomon & Rommert Dekker & Luk Van Wassenhove, 1999. "Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 733-747, May.
    16. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc & Dekker, Rommert, 1999. "An investigation of lead-time effects in manufacturing/remanufacturing systems under simple PUSH and PULL control strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 195-214, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazanin Hosseini Arian & Alireza Pooya & Fariborz Rahimnia & Ali Sibevei, 2021. "Assessment the effect of rapid prototyping implementation on supply chain sustainability: a system dynamics approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 467-493, December.
    2. Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Naim, Mohamed M. & Towill, Denis R. & Wikner, Joakim, 2016. "A technique to develop simplified and linearised models of complex dynamic supply chain systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 888-903.
    3. Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Kannan, Devika, 2015. "Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: A comprehensive review to explore the future," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(3), pages 603-626.
    4. Sylvia Mardiana, 2023. "Gasoline Policy Simulation to Increase Responsiveness Using System Dynamics: A Case Study of Indonesia’s Gasoline Downstream Supply Chain," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 109-118, November.
    5. Negar Jalilian & Seyed Mahmoud Zanjirchi & Alireza Naser Sadrabadi & Ahmadreza Asgharpourmasouleh & Mark Goh, 2021. "Agent-Based Approach to Configure Processes in Iran’s Banking Service Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Qinxin Guo & Enci Wang & Yongyou Nie & Junyi Shen, 2017. "Profit or Environment? A System Dynamic Model Analysis of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment Management System in China," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-30, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    7. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang & Chang, Yu-Hern & Lu, I.J., 2015. "Urban transportation energy and carbon dioxide emission reduction strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 953-973.
    8. Li, Ye & Yang, Tianjian & Zhang, Yu, 2022. "Evolutionary game theory-based system dynamics modeling for community solid waste classification in China," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Stadnicka, Dorota & Litwin, Paweł, 2019. "Value stream mapping and system dynamics integration for manufacturing line modelling and analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 400-411.
    10. Yasser A. Davizón & César Martínez-Olvera & Rogelio Soto & Carlos Hinojosa & Piero Espino-Román, 2015. "Optimal Control Approaches to the Aggregate Production Planning Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Samarghandi, Hamed, 2017. "Studying the impact of merged and divided storage policies on the profitability of a remanufacturing system with deteriorating revenues," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 160-171.
    12. Pérez-Pérez, Juan Fernando & Parra, Juan Felipe & Serrano-García, Jakeline, 2021. "A system dynamics model: Transition to sustainable processes," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    13. Tianjian Yang & Ye Li & Simin Zhou, 2019. "System Dynamics Modeling of Dockless Bike-Sharing Program Operations: A Case Study of Mobike in Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Xiangyun Chang & Junjie Fan & Yabing Zhao & Jie Wu, 2016. "Impact of China’s Recycling Subsidy Policy in the Product Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahiska, S. Sebnem & King, Russell E., 2010. "Life cycle inventory policy characterizations for a single-product recoverable system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 51-61, March.
    2. Kim, Eungab & Saghafian, Soroush & Van Oyen, Mark P., 2013. "Joint control of production, remanufacturing, and disposal activities in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 337-348.
    3. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2011. "An inventory control model with consideration of remanufacturing and product life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 645-652, October.
    4. Sebnem Ahiska, S. & King, Russell E., 2010. "Inventory optimization in a one product recoverable manufacturing system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(1), pages 11-19, March.
    5. Z P Bayındır & N Erkip & R Güllü, 2005. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 286-296, March.
    6. Gregory A. DeCroix, 2006. "Optimal Policy for a Multiechelon Inventory System with Remanufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 532-543, June.
    7. van der Laan, Erwin A. & Teunter, Ruud H., 2006. "Simple heuristics for push and pull remanufacturing policies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1084-1102, December.
    8. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    9. de Brito, Marisa P. & Dekker, Rommert, 2003. "Modelling product returns in inventory control--exploring the validity of general assumptions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 225-241, January.
    10. Bayindir, Z. Pelin & Erkip, Nesim & Gullu, Refik, 2003. "A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 597-607, January.
    11. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2014. "Heuristics with guaranteed performance bounds for a manufacturing system with product recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 322-329.
    12. Nenes, George & Panagiotidou, Sofia & Dekker, Rommert, 2010. "Inventory control policies for inspection and remanufacturing of returns: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 300-312, June.
    13. V. Daniel R. Guide & Vaidyanathan Jayaraman & Rajesh Srivastava & W. C. Benton, 2000. "Supply-Chain Management for Recoverable Manufacturing Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 125-142, June.
    14. Fleischmann, Moritz & Kuik, Roelof, 2003. "On optimal inventory control with independent stochastic item returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 25-37, November.
    15. Jian Yang & Boaz Golany & Gang Yu, 2005. "A concave‐cost production planning problem with remanufacturing options," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(5), pages 443-458, August.
    16. Bayindir, Z.P. & Erkip, N. & Gullu, R., 2003. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2003-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    17. Tang, Ou & Grubbstrom, Robert W., 2005. "Considering stochastic lead times in a manufacturing/remanufacturing system with deterministic demands and returns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 285-300, January.
    18. Zolfagharinia, Hossein & Hafezi, Maryam & Farahani, Reza Zanjirani & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2014. "A hybrid two-stock inventory control model for a reverse supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 141-161.
    19. Kaya, Onur, 2010. "Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 442-453, March.
    20. Niknejad, A. & Petrovic, D., 2014. "Optimisation of integrated reverse logistics networks with different product recovery routes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 143-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:144:y:2013:i:1:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.