IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v190y2008i2p421-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A continuous review replenishment-disposal policy for an inventory system with autonomous supply and fixed disposal costs

Author

Listed:
  • Pinçe, Çerag
  • Gürler, Ülkü
  • Berk, Emre

Abstract

In this study, we analyze an inventory system facing stochastic external demands and an autonomous supply (independent return flow) in the presence of fixed disposal costs and positive lead times under a continuous review replenishment-disposal policy. We derive the analytical expressions of the operating characteristics of the system; and, construct the objective function to minimize the total expected costs of ordering, holding, purchasing and disposal per unit time subject to a fill rate constraint. An extensive numerical analysis is conducted to study the sensitivity of the policy parameters and the benefit of employing a policy which allows for disposal of excess stock in this setting. We model the net demand process as the superposition of normally distributed external demand and inflows, which is expressed as a Brownian motion process. Our findings indicate that the disposal option results in considerable savings even (i) in the presence of non-zero fixed disposal costs, (ii) large actual demand rates with high return ratios (resulting in small net demands) and (iii) for moderate return ratios with high demand variability.

Suggested Citation

  • Pinçe, Çerag & Gürler, Ülkü & Berk, Emre, 2008. "A continuous review replenishment-disposal policy for an inventory system with autonomous supply and fixed disposal costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 190(2), pages 421-442, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:190:y:2008:i:2:p:421-442
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377-2217(07)00588-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fleischmann, Moritz & Kuik, Roelof & Dekker, Rommert, 2002. "Controlling inventories with stochastic item returns: A basic model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 63-75, April.
    2. Gonzalez-Torre, Pilar L. & Adenso-Diaz, B. & Artiba, Hakim, 2004. "Environmental and reverse logistics policies in European bottling and packaging firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 95-104, March.
    3. van der Laan, Erwin & Dekker, Rommert & Salomon, Marc & Ridder, Ad, 1996. "An (s, Q) inventory model with remanufacturing and disposal," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 339-350, December.
    4. George M. Constantinides & Scott F. Richard, 1978. "Existence of Optimal Simple Policies for Discounted-Cost Inventory and Cash Management in Continuous Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 620-636, August.
    5. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc, 1997. "Production planning and inventory control with remanufacturing and disposal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 264-278, October.
    6. George M. Constantinides, 1976. "Stochastic Cash Management with Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(12), pages 1320-1331, August.
    7. Teunter, Ruud H. & Vlachos, Dimitrios, 2002. "On the necessity of a disposal option for returned items that can be remanufactured," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 257-266, February.
    8. van der Laan, Erwin & Salomon, Marc & Dekker, Rommert, 1999. "An investigation of lead-time effects in manufacturing/remanufacturing systems under simple PUSH and PULL control strategies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 195-214, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yonit Barron, 2016. "Performance analysis of a reflected fluid production/inventory model," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 83(1), pages 1-31, February.
    2. Tamjidzad, Shahrzad & Mirmohammadi, S. Hamid, 2015. "An optimal (r, Q) policy in a stochastic inventory system with all-units quantity discount and limited sharable resource," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 93-100.
    3. Yonit Barron, 2016. "Performance analysis of a reflected fluid production/inventory model," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 83(1), pages 1-31, February.
    4. Andre P. Calmon & Stephen C. Graves, 2017. "Inventory Management in a Consumer Electronics Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 568-585, October.
    5. Barron, Yonit, 2016. "Clearing control policies for MAP inventory process with lost sales," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(2), pages 495-508.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Eungab & Saghafian, Soroush & Van Oyen, Mark P., 2013. "Joint control of production, remanufacturing, and disposal activities in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 337-348.
    2. Vercraene, Samuel & Gayon, Jean-Philippe & Flapper, Simme Douwe, 2014. "Coordination of manufacturing, remanufacturing and returns acceptance in hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 62-70.
    3. Vercraene, Samuel & Gayon, Jean-Philippe, 2013. "Optimal control of a production-inventory system with productreturns," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 302-310.
    4. Erwin van der Laan & Marc Salomon & Rommert Dekker & Luk Van Wassenhove, 1999. "Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 733-747, May.
    5. Bayindir, Z. Pelin & Erkip, Nesim & Gullu, Refik, 2003. "A model to evaluate inventory costs in a remanufacturing environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 597-607, January.
    6. Nenes, George & Panagiotidou, Sofia & Dekker, Rommert, 2010. "Inventory control policies for inspection and remanufacturing of returns: A case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(2), pages 300-312, June.
    7. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2011. "An inventory control model with consideration of remanufacturing and product life cycle," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(2), pages 645-652, October.
    8. Bayindir, Z.P. & Erkip, N. & Gullu, R., 2003. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution and capacity constraint," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2003-19, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    9. Eugene A. Feinberg & Mark E. Lewis, 2007. "Optimality Inequalities for Average Cost Markov Decision Processes and the Stochastic Cash Balance Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 769-783, November.
    10. Z P Bayındır & N Erkip & R Güllü, 2005. "Assessing the benefits of remanufacturing option under one-way substitution," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(3), pages 286-296, March.
    11. Gregory A. DeCroix, 2006. "Optimal Policy for a Multiechelon Inventory System with Remanufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 532-543, June.
    12. Poles, Roberto, 2013. "System Dynamics modelling of a production and inventory system for remanufacturing to evaluate system improvement strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 189-199.
    13. Kiesmuller, G. P., 2003. "A new approach for controlling a hybrid stochastic manufacturing/remanufacturing system with inventories and different leadtimes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 62-71, May.
    14. Kannan, Devika & Diabat, Ali & Alrefaei, Mahmoud & Govindan, Kannan & Yong, Geng, 2012. "A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 75-79.
    15. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    16. Alain Bensoussan & Benoît Chevalier-Roignant, 2019. "Sequential Capacity Expansion Options," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 33-57, January.
    17. Feng, Yan & Viswanathan, S., 2014. "Heuristics with guaranteed performance bounds for a manufacturing system with product recovery," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(2), pages 322-329.
    18. Abel Cadenillas & Peter Lakner & Michael Pinedo, 2010. "Optimal Control of a Mean-Reverting Inventory," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(6), pages 1697-1710, December.
    19. Haolin Feng & Kumar Muthuraman, 2010. "A Computational Method for Stochastic Impulse Control Problems," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 830-850, November.
    20. G P Kiesmüller & S Minner, 2003. "Simple expressions for finding recovery system inventory control parameter values," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 54(1), pages 83-88, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:190:y:2008:i:2:p:421-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.