IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/aumajo/v28y2020i2p90-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Natural Monopoly effect in brand purchasing: Do big brands really appeal to lighter category buyers?

Author

Listed:
  • Dawes, John

Abstract

This paper investigates the Natural Monopoly [NM] effect, which is that large brands have buyers who are on average less frequent or ‘lighter’ purchasers of the product category. The study analyzes the NM effect for brands in 28 consumer goods categories in The Netherlands. The analysis employs a multiple regression with category purchase rate as the dependent variable; and brand penetration, together with brand price, brand type, average pack size and promotion incidence as independent variables. The study finds that higher brand penetration is indeed associated with a lower rate of category purchase, controlling for the other variables in the model. The NM effect is reasonably large: the largest two brands in a category tend to have a buyer base that on average purchase the category about 25% less frequently than those of the smallest two. The study also derives an explanation for how large brands are generally purchased more frequently, even when their buyer base on average buys the category less frequently. The findings imply that a focus on heavy category buyers is inconsistent with the goal of growing a brand.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawes, John, 2020. "The Natural Monopoly effect in brand purchasing: Do big brands really appeal to lighter category buyers?," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 90-99.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:90-99
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.01.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441358220300069
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.01.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vipul Pare & John Dawes, 2012. "The persistence of excess brand loyalty over multiple years," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 163-175, March.
    2. Dawes, John G., 2012. "Brand-Pack Size Cannibalization Arising from Temporary Price Promotions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 343-355.
    3. Habel, Cullen & Lockshin, Larry, 2013. "Realizing the value of extensive replication: A theoretically robust portrayal of double jeopardy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(9), pages 1448-1456.
    4. Mark Uncles & Andrew Ehrenberg & Kathy Hammond, 1995. "Patterns of Buyer Behavior: Regularities, Models, and Extensions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(3_supplem), pages 71-78.
    5. Uncles, Mark D. & Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Reply to commentary on "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks"," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1329-1330, December.
    6. William R. Dillon & Sunil Gupta, 1996. "A Segment-Level Model of Category Volume and Brand Choice," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 38-59.
    7. Kim, Jungkeun, 2019. "The impact of different price promotions on customer retention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 95-102.
    8. Kevin J. Fox & Daniel Melser, 2014. "Non-Linear Pricing and Price Indexes: Evidence and Implications from Scanner Data," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 60(2), pages 261-278, June.
    9. Dominique M. Hanssens, 2018. "The value of empirical generalizations in marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 6-8, January.
    10. Allenby, Greg M & Lenk, Peter J, 1995. "Reassessing Brand Loyalty, Price Sensitivity, and Merchandising Effects on Consumer Brand Choice," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(3), pages 281-289, July.
    11. Trinh, Giang, 2014. "Predicting variation in repertoire size with the NBD model," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 111-116.
    12. Sanjay Jain, 2012. "Marketing of Vice Goods: A Strategic Analysis of the Package Size Decision," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(1), pages 36-51, January.
    13. Karsten Hansen & Vishal Singh & Pradeep Chintagunta, 2006. "Understanding Store-Brand Purchase Behavior Across Categories," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 75-90, 01-02.
    14. Banelis, Melissa & Riebe, Erica & Rungie, Campbell M., 2013. "Empirical evidence of repertoire size," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 59-65.
    15. Ehrenberg, Andrew S. C. & Uncles, Mark D. & Goodhardt, Gerald J., 2004. "Understanding brand performance measures: using Dirichlet benchmarks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 1307-1325, December.
    16. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Dunn, Steven & Trinh, Giang & Taylor, Jennifer & Volpe, Richard J., 2015. "Price promotion landscape in the US and UK: Depicting retail practice to inform future research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 1-11.
    17. Uncles, M. D. & Hammond, K. A. & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. & Davis, R. E., 1994. "A replication study of two brand-loyalty measures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 375-384, July.
    18. Yang, Zhilin & Bi, Zili & Zhou, Nan, 2005. "The Double Jeopardy Phenomenon and the Mediating Effect of Brand Penetration between Advertising and Brand Loyalty," Journal of Advertising Research, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 211-221, June.
    19. John Dawes & Bryon Sharp & Malcom Wrigth & Carl Driesener & Lars Meyer-Waarden & Lara Stocchi & Philip Stern, 2012. "It's a Dirichlet World: Modeling Individuals' Loyalties Reveals How Brands Compete, Grow, and Decline," Post-Print halshs-00862211, HAL.
    20. Romaniuk, Jenni & Dawes, John & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda, 2014. "Generalizations regarding the growth and decline of manufacturer and store brands," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 725-734.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trinh, Giang & Corsi, Armando & Lockshin, Larry, 2019. "How country of origins of food products compete and grow," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 231-241.
    2. Dawes, John & Meyer-Waarden, Lars & Driesener, Carl, 2015. "Has brand loyalty declined? A longitudinal analysis of repeat purchase behavior in the UK and the USA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 425-432.
    3. Trinh, Giang & Dawes, John, 2020. "A comparison of brand loyalty between on the go and take-home consumption purchases," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    4. Trinh, Giang & Lam, Desmond, 2016. "Understanding the attendance at cultural venues and events with stochastic preference models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3538-3544.
    5. Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Sharp, Byron & Dawes, John & Romaniuk, Jenni, 2010. "Competition for memory retrieval between private label and national brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(11), pages 1142-1147, November.
    6. Vipul Pare & John Dawes, 2012. "The persistence of excess brand loyalty over multiple years," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 163-175, March.
    7. Giang Trinh & Jenni Romaniuk & Arry Tanusondjaja, 2016. "Benchmarking buyer behavior towards new brands," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 743-752, December.
    8. Baker, Bradley J. & McDonald, Heath & Funk, Daniel C., 2016. "The uniqueness of sport: Testing against marketing's empirical laws," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 378-390.
    9. Zachary Anesbury & Maxwell Winchester & Rachel Kennedy, 2017. "Brand user profiles seldom change and seldom differ," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 523-535, December.
    10. Dawes, John, 2014. "Cigarette brand loyalty and purchase patterns: An examination using US consumer panel data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1933-1943.
    11. Bogomolova, Svetlana & Anesbury, Zachary & Lockshin, Larry & Kapulski, Natasha & Bogomolov, Tim, 2019. "Exploring the incidence and antecedents of buying an FMCG brand and UPC for the first time," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 121-129.
    12. Gauthier Casteran & Polymeros Chrysochou & Lars Meyer-Waarden, 2019. "Brand loyalty evolution and the impact of category characteristics," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 57-73, March.
    13. Peter J. Danaher & Isaac W. Wilson & Robert A. Davis, 2003. "A Comparison of Online and Offline Consumer Brand Loyalty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(4), pages 461-476, February.
    14. Dawes, John, 2022. "Factors that influence manufacturer and store brand behavioral loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    15. Graham, Charles & Khan, Kamran & Ilyas, Muhammad, 2019. "Estimating the value of passing trade from pedestrian density," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 103-111.
    16. Jung, Sang-Uk & Zhu, John & Gruca, Thomas S., 2016. "A meta-analysis of correlations between market share and other brand performance metrics in FMCG markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 5901-5908.
    17. Koll, Oliver & Plank, Andreas, 2022. "Do shoppers choose the same brand on the next trip when facing the same context? An empirical investigation in FMCG retailing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 576-592.
    18. Trinh, Giang & Khan, Huda & Lockshin, Larry, 2020. "Purchasing behaviour of ethnicities: Are they different?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    19. Mecredy, Philip & Wright, Malcolm J. & Feetham, Pamela, 2018. "Are promoters valuable customers? An application of the net promoter scale to predict future customer spend," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 3-9.
    20. Tanusondjaja, Arry & Nenycz-Thiel, Magda & Dawes, John & Kennedy, Rachel, 2018. "Portfolios: Patterns in brand penetration, market share, and hero product variants," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 211-217.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:aumajo:v:28:y:2020:i:2:p:90-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/australasian-marketing-journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.