Endogenous Preferences and Dynamic Contract Design
People's past decisions often play a significant role in shaping their future preferences. Based on this premise, we propose a model of endogenously changing preferences in an intertemporal environment. The two types of agents are distinguished by their self-knowledge of the dynamically inconsistent preferences. In particular, we study the dynamic contract design problem of a monopolistic principal in this setup. Commitment contracts and spot contracts are contrasted. When types are known to the principal, commitment contracts are superior to spot arrangements. When types are unobservable, we arrive at several unconventional results. First, the first best outcome can still be achieved in the case of commitment contracts. Second, informational externality may extend in both directions when the first best spot contracts are not incentive compatible. Lastly, in the second best spot contracts, informational rent may accrue to both types of agents.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 12 (2012)
Issue (Month): 1 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.degruyter.com|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bejte|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bpj:bejtec:v:12:y:2012:i:1:n:19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.