IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/popmgt/v30y2021i3p725-737.html

Product Line Flexibility for Agile and Adaptable Operations

Author

Listed:
  • H. Müge Yayla‐Küllü
  • Jennifer K. Ryan
  • Jayashankar M. Swaminathan

Abstract

Firms increasingly need to manage uncertainty and become more agile and adaptable. This study considers how a multi‐product firm can use its product mix, resource capacity allocation, and pricing decisions to manage challenges such as structural economic shifts or changes in consumers' willingness‐to‐pay. Firms that seek to develop and use such a product line face a fundamental trade‐off. On the one hand, multiple products compete for the demand externally (i.e., cannibalization effects), as well as for the limited resource capacity internally. On the other hand, a multi‐product firm does have the ability to change the product mix and to adjust the production quantity and pricing of each product in order to manipulate supply and demand as conditions change. In this study, we demonstrate that a multi‐product firm can become more agile and adaptable under consumer purchasing behavior uncertainty by employing postponement in product mix, quantity, and pricing decisions, and by allocating capacities appropriately. In particular, we show that a firm can use its product line flexibility to make strategic adjustments after understanding the realized economic conditions, and to decide whether to follow a focus or segmentation strategy. We also extend the model to look at the value of resource flexibility and find that it has little or no benefit above and beyond the product line flexibility studied here.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Müge Yayla‐Küllü & Jennifer K. Ryan & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2021. "Product Line Flexibility for Agile and Adaptable Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 725-737, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:725-737
    DOI: 10.1111/poms.13313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13313
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/poms.13313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    2. Omar Besbes & Assaf Zeevi, 2011. "On the Minimax Complexity of Pricing in a Changing Environment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 66-79, February.
    3. Hans Sebastian Heese & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Product Line Design with Component Commonality and Cost-Reduction Effort," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 206-219, May.
    4. Sergio Chayet & Panos Kouvelis & Dennis Z. Yu, 2011. "Product Variety and Capacity Investments in Congested Production Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(3), pages 390-403, July.
    5. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    6. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Sridhar R. Tayur, 1998. "Managing Broader Product Lines through Delayed Differentiation Using Vanilla Boxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 161-172, December.
    7. Sunder Kekre & Kannan Srinivasan, 1990. "Broader Product Line: A Necessity to Achieve Success?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(10), pages 1216-1232, October.
    8. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.
    9. Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2003. "Commissioned Paper: Capacity Management, Investment, and Hedging: Review and Recent Developments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 269-302, July.
    10. Omar Besbes & Denis Sauré, 2014. "Dynamic Pricing Strategies in the Presence of Demand Shifts," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(4), pages 513-528, October.
    11. Ruqu Wang & Yongmin Chen, 1999. "Learning buyers' valuation distribution in posted-price selling," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 14(2), pages 417-428.
    12. Alexander E. Saak, 2008. "The Value Of Private Information In Monopoly," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(1), pages 169-189, March.
    13. Hau L. Lee & Christopher S. Tang, 1997. "Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 40-53, January.
    14. Marshall L. Fisher & Christopher D. Ittner, 1999. "The Impact of Product Variety on Automobile Assembly Operations: Empirical Evidence and Simulation Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(6), pages 771-786, June.
    15. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "Multiproduct Cournot oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 583-601, September.
    16. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2003. "Multiproduct Quality Competition: Fighting Brands and Product Line Pruning," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 748-774, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Qiang Liu & Xiaofeng Liu & Subramanian Balachander, 2021. "Crowdfunding Project Design: Optimal Product Menu and Funding Target," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3800-3811, October.
    2. Wenzhu Zhang & Yue Dai & Lin Tian, 2022. "Impact of capacity flexibility on service product line design," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1095-1118, May.
    3. Perraudat, Antoine & Dauzère-Pérès, Stéphane & Vialletelle, Philippe, 2022. "Robust tactical qualification decisions in flexible manufacturing systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Bamberger, Boas & Reinartz, Werner & Ulaga, Wolfgang, 2025. "Navigating the future of B2B marketing: The transformative impact of the industrial metaverse," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Kai Hao, 2021. "Efficient demands in a multi-product monopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Kai-Lung Hui, 2004. "Product Variety Under Brand Influence: An Empirical Investigation of Personal Computer Demand," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(5), pages 686-700, May.
    3. Gabszewicz, Jean J. & Marini, Marco A. & Tarola, Ornella, "undated". "Vertical Differentiation and Collusion: Cannibalization or Proliferation?," ETA: Economic Theory and Applications 232221, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    4. Natalia Fabra & Juan-Pablo Montero, 2022. "Product Lines and Price Discrimination in Markets with Information Frictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 981-1001, February.
    5. Jean J. Gabszewicz & Marco A. Marini & Ornella Tarola, 2016. "Vertical Differentiation and Collusion: Cannibalization or Proliferation?," Working Papers 2016.15, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    6. Yang, Kai Hao, 2023. "On the continuity of outcomes in a monopoly market," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Johnson, Justin P. & Myatt, David P., 2015. "The properties of product line prices," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 182-188.
    8. Wan, Xiang & Britto, Rodrigo & Zhou, Zenan, 2020. "In search of the negative relationship between product variety and inventory turnover," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    9. Yenipazarli, A. & Vakharia, A., 2015. "Pricing, market coverage and capacity: Can green and brown products co-exist?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 304-315.
    10. Tookanlou, Parisa Bagheri & Wong, Hartanto, 2020. "Determining the optimal customization levels, lead times, and inventory positioning in vertical product differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Yi-Ling Cheng & Shin-Kun Peng, 2012. "Quality and Quantity Competition in a Multiproduct Duopoly," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(1), pages 180-202, July.
    12. H. Müge Yayla-Küllü & Omkar D. Palsule-Desai & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2022. "Reining in Onion Prices by Introducing a Vertically Differentiated Substitute: Models, Analysis, and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 3283-3305, November.
    13. Stole, Lars A., 2007. "Price Discrimination and Competition," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: Mark Armstrong & Robert Porter (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 34, pages 2221-2299, Elsevier.
    14. Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie & Liang, Liang & Zhu, Qingyuan, 2018. "The impacts of public sustainability concerns on length of product line," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 16-23.
    15. Chisholm, Darlene C. & Norman, George, 2012. "Market access and competition in product lines," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 429-435.
    16. Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2025. "OM Forum—Operations Management Research: Relevance and Impact," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 1-7, January.
    17. Creane, Anthony, 2019. "Shipping the good apples under strategic competition," MPRA Paper 93744, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Menezes, Mozart B.C. & Jalali, Hamed & Lamas, Alejandro, 2021. "One too many: Product proliferation and the financial performance in manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    19. Antonio Moreno & Christian Terwiesch, 2017. "The Effects of Product Line Breadth: Evidence from the Automotive Industry," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 254-271, March.
    20. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:popmgt:v:30:y:2021:i:3:p:725-737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1937-5956 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.