IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v24y2022i6p3283-3305.html

Reining in Onion Prices by Introducing a Vertically Differentiated Substitute: Models, Analysis, and Insights

Author

Listed:
  • H. Müge Yayla-Küllü

    (College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32816)

  • Omkar D. Palsule-Desai

    (Indian Institute of Management Indore, Indore 453 331, India)

  • Srinagesh Gavirneni

    (Samuel Curtis Johnson Graduate School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853)

Abstract

Problem definition : Onion is an indispensable ingredient of the Indian diet, and plays a vital role in Indian economy, society, and politics. The ever-lasting volatility in its prices leads to significant social unrest. In this paper, we are interested in helping decision makers to rigorously evaluate a recent policy proposal to make dehydrated onion widely available to remedy the situation. Methodology/results : Using a stylized analytical model, we look for conditions under which it is optimal to introduce a processed substitute and whether it should be managed by nonprofit or for-profit firms. We find that the solution is identified by threshold-based policies and outcomes are far better under the nonprofit management. We also find that a nonprofit processing firm may purposefully choose a strategy where consumers do not purchase its offering for a certain medium range of raw onion deterioration levels. In addition, we find that a for-profit firm would always choose to be the lower-quality substitute in the market unless the raw onion deterioration is high. We also find that when supply capacity is constrained, sales of the processed substitute might decrease with increased supply availability. Managerial implications : This is the first paper that takes perishability and consumer welfare into account in a two-period vertically differentiated market model and compares various scenarios of competition when there is consumer prejudice for the processed substitute. For India’s policymakers, we find ample evidence to work toward implementing the processed substitute policy. We go deep and discuss tailored insights for certain regions in India. We find that although improved consumer perception is favorable in general, policymakers should be careful about some unintended consequences such as increased prices and lower availability.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Müge Yayla-Küllü & Omkar D. Palsule-Desai & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2022. "Reining in Onion Prices by Introducing a Vertically Differentiated Substitute: Models, Analysis, and Insights," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 3283-3305, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:3283-3305
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2022.1145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.1145
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2022.1145?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ozinci, Yaacov & Perlman, Yael & Westrich, Sara, 2017. "Competition between organic and conventional products with different utilities and shelf lives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 74-84.
    2. Dr Sohan Premi & Dr B R Premi, 2017. "Onion Supply Chain Analysis: Constraints and Way Forward," Working Papers id:12060, eSocialSciences.
    3. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "Multiproduct Cournot oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 583-601, September.
    4. Geraldo Ferrer & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2006. "Managing New and Remanufactured Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(1), pages 15-26, January.
    5. Mehmet Gümüş & Saibal Ray & Shuya Yin, 2013. "Returns Policies Between Channel Partners for Durable Products," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 622-643, July.
    6. Salop, Steven C, 1979. "Strategic Entry Deterrence," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 69(2), pages 335-338, May.
    7. Serdar Sayman & Stephen J. Hoch & Jagmohan S. Raju, 2002. "Positioning of Store Brands," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 378-397, June.
    8. Chris Parker & Kamalini Ramdas & Nicos Savva, 2016. "Is IT Enough? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India’s Agriculture Markets," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(9), pages 2481-2503, September.
    9. Justin P. Johnson Author-Email: jpj25@cornell.edu Author-Workplace-Name: Cornell University & David P. Myatt, 2006. "Multiproduct Cournot Oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(3), pages 583-601, Autumn.
    10. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Kim, Kilsun & Chhajed, Dilip, 2000. "Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 602-621, September.
    12. Retsef Levi & Somya Singhvi & Yanchong Zheng, 2022. "Artificial Shortage in Agricultural Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 746-765, March.
    13. Jean Tirole, 1988. "The Theory of Industrial Organization," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262200716, December.
    14. Brian Tomlin & Yimin Wang, 2008. "Pricing and Operational Recourse in Coproduction Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 522-537, March.
    15. Qian Liu & Dan Zhang, 2013. "Dynamic Pricing Competition with Strategic Customers Under Vertical Product Differentiation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 84-101, August.
    16. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1988. "Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(2), pages 141-168.
    17. Groznik, Ana & Heese, H. Sebastian, 2010. "Supply chain interactions due to store-brand introductions: The impact of retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(3), pages 575-582, June.
    18. Timothy J. Lowe & Paul V. Preckel, 2004. "Decision Technologies for Agribusiness Problems: A Brief Review of Selected Literature and a Call for Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 6(3), pages 201-208.
    19. Mou, Shandong & Robb, David J. & DeHoratius, Nicole, 2018. "Retail store operations: Literature review and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 399-422.
    20. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2003. "Multiproduct Quality Competition: Fighting Brands and Product Line Pruning," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 93(3), pages 748-774, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ting Lei & Bin Dan & Yongqi Yuan & Yu Tian & Yu Ding, 2025. "Release Strategy of Competing Retailers for Reserved Produce Under the Government's Emergency Reserves With Order Constraints," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 2524-2539, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chisholm, Darlene C. & Norman, George, 2012. "Market access and competition in product lines," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 30(5), pages 429-435.
    2. Fang, Xiang & Gavirneni, Srinagesh & Rao, Vithala R., 2013. "Supply chains in the presence of store brands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 392-403.
    3. Justin P. Johnson & David P. Myatt, 2006. "On the Simple Economics of Advertising, Marketing, and Product Design," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 96(3), pages 756-784, June.
    4. Kuo, Chia-Wei & Yang, Shu-Jung Sunny, 2013. "The role of store brand positioning for appropriating supply chain profit under shelf space allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(1), pages 88-97.
    5. Arcan Nalca, & Tamer Boyaci, & Saibal Ray, 2017. "Consumer taste uncertainty in the context of store brand and national brand competition," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-17-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    6. Holmberg, Pär & Ruddell, Keith & Willems, Bert, 2025. "Multi-Product Supply Function Equilibria," Working Paper Series 1537, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    7. Natalia Fabra & Juan-Pablo Montero, 2022. "Product Lines and Price Discrimination in Markets with Information Frictions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 981-1001, February.
    8. Behzadi, Golnar & O’Sullivan, Michael Justin & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Zhang, Abraham, 2018. "Agribusiness supply chain risk management: A review of quantitative decision models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 21-42.
    9. Yang, Guang & Tian, Lin & Cai, Mei & Cao, Jie & Gong, Zaiwu, 2025. "Vertically probabilistic selling mechanism under asymmetric quality-tier competition: An analytical exploration," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    10. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2018. "How transport costs affect the decision to purchase a new or a remanufactured good," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 529-542, August.
    11. Hsiao, Lu & Xiong, Hui, 2022. "Store brand introduction, retail competition and manufacturers’ coping strategies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    12. Hubert Pun & Gregory D. DeYong, 2017. "Competing with Copycats When Customers Are Strategic," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 403-418, July.
    13. Iwan Bos & Ronald Peeters, 2023. "Price Competition in a Vertizontally Differentiated Duopoly," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 62(3), pages 219-239, May.
    14. H. Müge Yayla‐Küllü & Jennifer K. Ryan & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2021. "Product Line Flexibility for Agile and Adaptable Operations," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 725-737, March.
    15. Yang, Kai Hao, 2021. "Efficient demands in a multi-product monopoly," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Yi-Ling Cheng & Shin-Kun Peng, 2012. "Quality and Quantity Competition in a Multiproduct Duopoly," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 79(1), pages 180-202, July.
    17. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2014. "A Dynamic Network Oligopoly Model with Transportation Costs, Product Differentiation, and Quality Competition," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 44(2), pages 201-229, August.
    18. David P. Baron, 2021. "Dynamic positioning, product innovation, and entry in a vertically differentiated market," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 287-307, May.
    19. Ahumada, Omar & Rene Villalobos, J. & Nicholas Mason, A., 2012. "Tactical planning of the production and distribution of fresh agricultural products under uncertainty," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 17-26.
    20. A. Yeşim Orhun & Sriram Venkataraman & Pradeep K. Chintagunta, 2016. "Impact of Competition on Product Decisions: Movie Choices of Exhibitors," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 73-92, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:24:y:2022:i:6:p:3283-3305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.