IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/labour/v38y2024i2p230-255.html

Some searches may not work properly. We apologize for the inconvenience.

   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating uncertainty: Employee participation dynamics in times of crisis

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Lammers
  • Marek Giebel

Abstract

The flow of information continues to expand exponentially while, at the same time, decision‐making becomes more complex. Employees, organizations, and societies face an increasingly hard challenge in identifying and utilizing information effectively. In the context of a crisis, the need for timely and correct information increases even more to support management decisions. Communication channels such as meetings and staff involvement committees (voluntary or mandatory) are crucial for efficient knowledge flows between employees, management, and within divisions. However, less is known about their pattern of creation at different stages of a crisis. This empirical study investigates the relevance of the Financial Crisis for the introduction and dissolution of staff involvement committees. Using the German IAB Establishment Panel, we use a conditional difference‐in‐differences framework and provide empirical evidence of whether employers initiated or abolished staff involvement committees in different stages of the recession. Our findings reveal that negatively affected establishments are more likely to introduce communication channels, especially during the crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Lammers & Marek Giebel, 2024. "Navigating uncertainty: Employee participation dynamics in times of crisis," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 38(2), pages 230-255, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:38:y:2024:i:2:p:230-255
    DOI: 10.1111/labr.12267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/labr.12267
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/labr.12267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:labour:v:38:y:2024:i:2:p:230-255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csrotit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.