IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/indrel/v51y2020i1-2p2-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

It is not just what you say, but how you say it: A case study exploring union‐member communications

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Smith
  • Linda Duxbury

Abstract

This paper presents key findings from a multimethod study analysing the communication practices of a large American labour union through a generational cohort lens. Survey data were used to compare how the union communicates information to its members with how participants would like to receive this information. Interview data were analyzed to help us better understand union members' perceptions of their union's communication practices and how these could be improved. This research determined that union members wanted the union to make more of an effort to use face‐to‐face communication practices. Younger union members want their union to make more use of electronic communication technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Smith & Linda Duxbury, 2020. "It is not just what you say, but how you say it: A case study exploring union‐member communications," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1-2), pages 2-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:51:y:2020:i:1-2:p:2-33
    DOI: 10.1111/irj.12278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12278
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/irj.12278?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:indrel:v:51:y:2020:i:1-2:p:2-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0019-8692 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.