IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecorec/v63y1987i1p33-45.html

How Reliable are ORANI Conclusions?

Author

Listed:
  • A. R. PAGAN
  • J. H. SHANNON

Abstract

This paper seeks to systematically review the main criticisms of the ORANI model by developing a graphical version of a two‐sector (exportables and nonexportables) miniature ORANI model. This model shows that ORANI results occur because while supply curves in both sectors have similar slopes. the slopes of the demand curves are polar opposites. Furthermore this model shows that results will tend to be more sensitive to variations in supply rather than demand parameters. Experiments using the ORANI model itself verified these findings. These results indicate that some form of sensitivity analysis with respect to assigned parameter values should form an integral part of any ORANI experiment.

Suggested Citation

  • A. R. Pagan & J. H. Shannon, 1987. "How Reliable are ORANI Conclusions?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 63(1), pages 33-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:63:y:1987:i:1:p:33-45
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4932.1987.tb00635.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1987.tb00635.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1987.tb00635.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bewley, R. A., 1979. "The direct estimation of the equilibrium response in a linear dynamic model," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 357-361.
    2. Chris M. Alaouze & John S. Marsden & John Zeitsch, 1977. "Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution Between Imported and Domestically Produced Commodities at the Four Digit ASIC Level," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers o-11, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    3. M.R. Cronin, 1979. "Export Demand Elasticities With Less Than Perfect Markets," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(1), pages 69-72, April.
    4. Cronin, M.R., 1979. "Export Demand Elasticities With Less Than Perfect Markets," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 23(01), pages 1-4, April.
    5. Higgs, Peter J & Parmenter, B R & Powell, Alan A, 1984. "The Scope for Tariff Reform Created by a Resources Boom: Simulations with the ORANI Model," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(42), pages 1-26, June.
    6. B. R. Parmenter & G. A. Meagher, 1985. "Policy Analysis Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model: A Review of Experience at the IMPACT Project," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 18(1), pages 3-15, March.
    7. Peter B. Dixon & B. R. Parmenter & Russell J. Rimmer, 1985. "The Sensitivity of ORANI Projections of the Short-run Effects of Increases in Protection to Variations in the Values Adopted for Export Demand Elasticities," International Economic Association Series, in: Karl Jungenfelt & Douglas Hague (ed.), Structural Adjustment in Developed Open Economies, chapter 11, pages 317-354, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Purcell, Tim & Karunaratne, Neil & Tisdell, Clem, 1997. "Macroeconomic Effects of Disease Control in the Thailand Livestock Sector - A CGE Analyis," Animal Health Economics 164581, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    2. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    3. DeVuyst, Eric A. & Preckel, Paul V., 1997. "Sensitivity analysis revisited: A quadrature-based approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 175-185, April.
    4. Zewdie Habte Shikur, 2020. "Agricultural policies, agricultural production and rural households’ welfare in Ethiopia," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Cristina Cattaneo, 2008. "The Determinants of Actual Migration and the Role of Wages and Unemployment in Albania: an Empirical Analysis," European Journal of Comparative Economics, Cattaneo University (LIUC), vol. 5(1), pages 3-32, June.
    6. Joshua Elliott & Meredith Franklin & Ian Foster & Todd Munson & Margaret Loudermilk, 2012. "Propagation of Data Error and Parametric Sensitivity in Computable General Equilibrium Models," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 39(3), pages 219-241, March.
    7. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    8. George Verikios, 2004. "A Model of the World Wool Market," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 04-24, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Robert M´barek & Ivelin Iliev Rizov, 2013. "European Coexistence Bureau. Best Practice Documents for coexistence of genetically modified crops with conventional and organic farming. 3. Coexistence of genetically modified maize and honey product," JRC Research Reports JRC84850, Joint Research Centre.
    10. Kapuscinski, Cezary A. & Warr, Peter G., 1999. "Estimation of Armington elasticities: an application to the Philippines," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 257-278, April.
    11. Touhami Abdelkhalek & Jean-Marie Dufour, 1998. "Statistical Inference For Computable General Equilibrium Models, With Application To A Model Of The Moroccan Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 520-534, November.
    12. Hertel, Thomas, 2013. "Global Applied General Equilibrium Analysis Using the Global Trade Analysis Project Framework," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 815-876, Elsevier.
    13. Hillberry, Russell & Hummels, David, 2013. "Trade Elasticity Parameters for a Computable General Equilibrium Model," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1213-1269, Elsevier.
    14. Michael Malakellis & Matthew Peter, 1991. "Stimulation of Employment in Neo-Classical Models," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers ip-49, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lence, Sergio H.(Sergio Horacio), 1988. "Transfer costs in agricultural trade: implications for empirical research," ISU General Staff Papers 1988010108000017599, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Alston, Julian M. & Freebairn, John W., 1988. "Producer Price Equalization," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(03), pages 1-34, December.
    3. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R., 2004. "The Payoff from Generic Advertising by the Australian Pig Industry in the Presence of Trade," Working Papers 12946, University of New England, School of Economics.
    4. Scobie, Grant McDonald, 1981. "Government policy and food imports: the case of wheat in Egypt," Research reports 29, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. John W. Freebairn, 1989. "Some Effects of Reducing Excess in Infrastructure Charges on the Export Coal Industry," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 65(4), pages 345-356, December.
    6. Voon, J. P. & Edwards, G. W., 1999. "Impacts of foreign policies on the gains from research and promotion," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(1), pages 11-21, January.
    7. Martin, S.K. & Zwart, A.C., 1987. "Marketing Agencies And The Economics Of Market Segmentation," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Henry Haszler & Geoff Edwards & Anthony Chisholm & Phillip Hone, 1996. "The Wool Debt, the Wool Stockpile and the National Interest: Did the Garnaut Committee Get it Right?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 72(218), pages 260-271, September.
    9. Zhao, Xueyan & Mullen, John D. & Griffith, Garry R. & Griffiths, William E. & Piggott, Roley R., 2000. "An Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Australian Beef Industry," Research Reports 28007, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    10. Mounter, Stuart W. & Griffith, Garry R. & Piggott, Roley R. & Mullen, John D., 2005. "The Relative Payoffs From R&D and Generic Advertising Expenditure by the Australian Pig Industry," Working Papers 12943, University of New England, School of Economics.
    11. Borrell, Brent & Wong, Gordon, 1986. "Efficiency of transport, milling and handling in the sugar industry: a case study of the Mackay region," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316178, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.
    12. Hendry, David F. & Clements, Michael P., 2003. "Economic forecasting: some lessons from recent research," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 301-329, March.
    13. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.
    14. Ekaterini Panopoulou, 2005. "A Resolution of the Fisher Effect Puzzle: A Comparison of Estimators," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp067, IIIS.
    15. John Lewis & Selien De Schryder, 2015. "Export dynamics since the Great Trade Collapse: a cross-country analysis," Bank of England working papers 535, Bank of England.
    16. Clayton Webb & Suzanna Linn & Matthew J. Lebo, 2020. "Beyond the Unit Root Question: Uncertainty and Inference," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 275-292, April.
    17. Bruno Damásio & Diogo Martins, 2017. "Do Labour Market Reforms Pay Off? Unemployment and Capital Accumulation in Portugal," Working Papers Department of Economics 2017/01, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Department of Economics, Universidade de Lisboa.
    18. Zhou, De & Yu, Xiaohua & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2015. "Dynamic food demand in urban China," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 27-44.
    19. Miguel, Carlos de & O'Ryan, Raúl & Pereira, Mauricio & Carriquiri, Bruno, 2009. "Energy shocks, fiscal policy and CO2 emissions in Chile," Conference papers 331817, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Sambit Bhattacharyya & Jeffrey G Williamson, 2013. "Distributional Impact of Commodity Price Shocks: Australia over a century," OxCarre Working Papers 117, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecorec:v:63:y:1987:i:1:p:33-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.