IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i3p4563-4586.html

Giving or Greening? Stakeholder Dynamics and Ex‐Military Executives

Author

Listed:
  • Hyeyoun Park
  • Jiangtao Xie
  • Tao Chen
  • Taewoo Roh

Abstract

Firms increasingly face competing demands from different stakeholder groups, yet little is known about how these demands interact and generate strategic trade‐offs. Drawing on stakeholder theory and upper echelons theory, we investigate whether an overemphasis on philanthropic initiatives can detract from investments in green innovation, and how this relationship is moderated by the attributes of military executives. Based on 2873 firm‐year observations from 930 Chinese listed firms from 2006 to 2017, we find that philanthropic overinvestment crowds out green innovation. However, this substitution effect is mitigated when firms are led by ex‐military executives, who possess stronger stakeholder orientation and resource mobilization capabilities. Furthermore, we show that compensation growth amplifies the positive moderating role of military experience. This study contributes to the literature by providing practical insights into the impact of ex‐military executive appointments on firms' green innovation strategies. We also highlight that firms must strategically manage the trade‐offs within their corporate social responsibility portfolio, recognizing that executive decisions on competing initiatives are significantly influenced by managers' characteristics such as prior military experience and incentive structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyeyoun Park & Jiangtao Xie & Tao Chen & Taewoo Roh, 2026. "Giving or Greening? Stakeholder Dynamics and Ex‐Military Executives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(3), pages 4563-4586, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4563-4586
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:3:p:4563-4586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.