IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ahs/journl/v10y2026i4p1495-1515.html

The Effects of Macroeconomic News Surprises on Borsa Istanbul Sectoral Indices: A Study with Volatility Models

Author

Listed:
  • Merve Yıldırım
  • Durmus Yıldırım

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact of unexpected economic news announcements on the returns of sectoral indices in Borsa Istanbul (BIST). Utilizing volatility models, the research examines how unexpected developments in key financial indicators influence sectoral returns and volatility reactions. The dataset comprises daily closing prices of 26 BIST sectoral indices from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2022, sourced from Tradingview. Data regarding expectations and realized values for inflation, growth, unemployment, CBRT policy rates, and FED interest rates were obtained from Bloomberg. The findings reveal that average returns across all sectoral indices are positive, with positive news announcements yielding a more favorable impact than negative ones. Furthermore, negative shocks induce higher volatility than positive shocks, indicating a significant leverage effect across the indices. As the most comprehensive study to date covering 26 indices, these results provide vital insights for investors regarding market reactions to economic surprises and contribute significantly to the existing literature on emerging market efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Merve Yıldırım & Durmus Yıldırım, 2026. "The Effects of Macroeconomic News Surprises on Borsa Istanbul Sectoral Indices: A Study with Volatility Models," Journal of Research in Economics, Politics & Finance, Ersan ERSOY, vol. 10(4), pages 1495-1515.
    • Handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:4:p:1495-1515
    DOI: 10.30784/epfad.1725746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/4985147
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.30784/epfad.1725746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chang, Chia-Lin & McAleer, Michael, 2017. "The correct regularity condition and interpretation of asymmetry in EGARCH," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 52-55.
    2. Christie, Andrew A., 1982. "The stochastic behavior of common stock variances : Value, leverage and interest rate effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 407-432, December.
    3. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986. "Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 307-327, April.
    4. Hanousek, Jan & Kocenda, Evzen & Kutan, Ali M., 2009. "The reaction of asset prices to macroeconomic announcements in new EU markets: Evidence from intraday data," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 199-219, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charles, Amélie & Darné, Olivier, 2019. "The accuracy of asymmetric GARCH model estimation," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 179-202.
    2. Bentes, Sonia R., 2018. "Is stock market volatility asymmetric? A multi-period analysis for five countries," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 258-265.
    3. Alagidede, Paul & Panagiotidis, Theodore, 2009. "Modelling stock returns in Africa's emerging equity markets," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 18(1-2), pages 1-11, March.
    4. Takahashi, Makoto & Watanabe, Toshiaki & Omori, Yasuhiro, 2016. "Volatility and quantile forecasts by realized stochastic volatility models with generalized hyperbolic distribution," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 437-457.
    5. Ricardo Alberola, 2007. "Estimating Volatility Returns Using ARCH Models. An Empirical Case: The Spanish Energy Market," Revista Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, CIE.
    6. Ahn, Eun S. & Lee, Jin Man, 2012. "The Performance Of Nonlinearity Tests On Asymmetric Nonlinear Time Series," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 11-44.
    7. Andersen, Torben G. & Bollerslev, Tim, 1997. "Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 4(2-3), pages 115-158, June.
    8. Christensen, Bent Jesper & Nielsen, Morten Ørregaard & Zhu, Jie, 2015. "The impact of financial crises on the risk–return tradeoff and the leverage effect," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 407-418.
    9. Najam Iqbal & Muhammad Saqib Manzoor & Muhammad Ishaq Bhatti, 2021. "Asymmetry and Leverage with News Impact Curve Perspective in Australian Stock Returns’ Volatility during COVID-19," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, July.
    10. Jaleel, Fazeel M. & Samarakoon, Lalith P., 2009. "Stock market liberalization and return volatility: Evidence from the emerging market of Sri Lanka," Journal of Multinational Financial Management, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 409-423, December.
    11. Ekaterina Smetanina, 2017. "Real-Time GARCH," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(4), pages 561-601.
    12. F. Gonzalez Miranda & N. Burgess, 1997. "Modelling market volatilities: the neural network perspective," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 137-157.
    13. Leopoldo Catania & Stefano Grassi, 2017. "Modelling Crypto-Currencies Financial Time-Series," CEIS Research Paper 417, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 11 Dec 2017.
    14. Huang, Yu Chuan & Chen, Shing Chun, 2002. "Warrants pricing: Stochastic volatility vs. Black-Scholes," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 393-409, September.
    15. Chia-Lin Chang & Michael McAleer & Jiarong Tian, 2019. "Modeling and Testing Volatility Spillovers in Oil and Financial Markets for the USA, the UK, and China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    16. Takaishi, Tetsuya, 2017. "Rational GARCH model: An empirical test for stock returns," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 473(C), pages 451-460.
    17. Ncube, Mthuli, 1996. "Modelling implied volatility with OLS and panel data models," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 71-84, January.
    18. Ender Su & John Bilson, 2011. "Trading asymmetric trend and volatility by leverage trend GARCH in Taiwan stock index," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(26), pages 3891-3905.
    19. Campbell, John Y. & Giglio, Stefano & Polk, Christopher & Turley, Robert, 2018. "An intertemporal CAPM with stochastic volatility," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 207-233.
    20. Campbell, John Y. & Hentschel, Ludger, 1992. "No news is good news *1: An asymmetric model of changing volatility in stock returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 281-318, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • G14 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Information and Market Efficiency; Event Studies; Insider Trading
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • G12 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ahs:journl:v:10:y:2026:i:4:p:1495-1515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ersan Ersoy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://epfjournal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.