IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/pawjal/236901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis Of The Characteristics And Practices Of Selected Alabama Small Livestock Producers: A Focus On Production And Processing

Author

Listed:
  • Bartlett, Jannette R.
  • Jahan, Mst Nusrat
  • Tackie, David Nii O.
  • Adu-Gyamfi, Akua
  • Quarcoo, Francisca A.

Abstract

The study assessed the characteristics and practices of small livestock producers, emphasizing production and processing. Data were obtained from a convenience sample of 121 small producers from South Central Alabama, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, including chisquare tests. The socioeconomic factors showed most were part-time farmers; middle-aged producers; producers with at most a two-year/technical degree or some college education, and producers with $40,000 or less annual household income. A majority practiced rotational grazing, fed a combination of forage (direct from pasture), hay and concentrate, and about half conducted soil tests regularly. Furthermore, many had goats with parasite problems that were treated these primarily with anthelmintics; most sold live animals. The chi-square tests showed that farming status, gender, race/ethnicity, education, and household income had statistically significant relationships with production and processing characteristics. Socioeconomic factors should be considered in programs assisting producers in the study area.

Suggested Citation

  • Bartlett, Jannette R. & Jahan, Mst Nusrat & Tackie, David Nii O. & Adu-Gyamfi, Akua & Quarcoo, Francisca A., 2016. "An Analysis Of The Characteristics And Practices Of Selected Alabama Small Livestock Producers: A Focus On Production And Processing," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pawjal:236901
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.236901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/236901/files/3-2%202016%20PAWJ%20-%204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.236901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ward, Clement E. & Vestal, Mallory K. & Doye, Damona G. & Lalman, David L., 2008. "Factors Affecting Adoption of Cow-Calf Production Practices in Oklahoma," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(3), pages 851-863, December.
    2. Martinez, Steve & Hand, Michael & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan & Ralston, Katherine & Smith, Travis & Vogel, Stephen & Clarke, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah & Newman, Constance, 2010. "Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues," MPRA Paper 24313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Amy Guptill & Jennifer Wilkins, 2002. "Buying into the food system: Trends in food retailing in the US and implications for local foods," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 19(1), pages 39-51, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Printezis, Iryna & Grebitus, Carola, 2018. "Marketing Channels for Local Food," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 161-171.
    2. Tackie, Nii O. & Bartlett, Jannette R. & Adu-Gyamfi, Akua, 2014. "Assessing Alabama Consumer Attitudes And Beliefs About Locally Or Regionally Produced Livestock And Products," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 2(2), pages 1-21.
    3. Omar Alsetoohy & Baker Ayoun & Mahmoud Abou-Kamar, 2021. "COVID-19 Pandemic Is a Wake-Up Call for Sustainable Local Food Supply Chains: Evidence from Green Restaurants in the USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Rouvière, Elodie, 2016. "Small is beautiful: firm size, prevention and food safety," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 12-22.
    5. Flores, Hector & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2018. "A modeling framework for the strategic design of local fresh-food systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Gupta, Clare & Jablonski, Becca B.R., 2016. "Farm Impacts of Farm-to-Grocer Sales: The Case of Hawai’i," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 47(3), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Etemadnia, Hamideh & Goetz, Stephan J. & Canning, Patrick & Tavallali, Mohammad Sadegh, 2015. "Optimal wholesale facilities location within the fruit and vegetables supply chain with bimodal transportation options: An LP-MIP heuristic approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(2), pages 648-661.
    8. Carpio, Carlos E. & Mathews, Leah G. & Boonsaeng, Tullaya & Perrett, Allison & Descieux, Katie, 2015. "Evaluating the Marketing Impact of a Regional Branding Program Using Contingent Valuation Methods: The Case of the Appalachian Grown™ Branding Program," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205800, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Sara Fabbrizzi & Silvio Menghini & Nicola Marinelli, 2014. "The Short Food Supply Chain: A Concrete Example of Sustainability. A Literature Review," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 189-206.
    10. Shermain Hardesty & Gail Feenstra & David Visher & Tracy Lerman & Dawn Thilmany-McFadden & Allison Bauman & Tom Gillpatrick & Gretchen Nurse Rainbolt, 2014. "Values-Based Supply Chains," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(1), pages 17-27, February.
    11. Ken Belcher & Andrea Germann & Josef Schmutz, 2007. "Beef with environmental and quality attributes: Preferences of environmental group and general population consumers in Saskatchewan, Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(3), pages 333-342, September.
    12. Bartlett, Jannette R. & Tackie, Nii O. & Jahan, Mst Nusrat & Adu-Gyamfi, Akua & Quarcoo, Francisca A., 2015. "An Analysis of the Characteristics and Practices of Selected Alabama Small Livestock Producers: A Focus on Economics and Marketing," Professional Agricultural Workers Journal (PAWJ), Professional Agricultural Workers Conference, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25.
    13. McDonald, Jennifer, 2019. "The relationship between cottage food laws and business outcomes: A quantitative study of cottage food producers in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 21-34.
    14. Volpe, Richard & Leibtag, Ephraim S. & Roeger, Edward, 2013. "How Transport Costs Affect Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Prices," Economic Research Report 161355, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    15. Corsi, Alessandro & Frontuto, Vito & Novelli, Silvia, 2022. "Relational goods and direct purchase from farmers: estimating the value of the relationship between consumers and producers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    16. Bareja-Wawryszuk, Ola & Gołębiewski, Jarosław, 2014. "Economic Functions Of Open-Air Trade In The Context Of Local Food System Development," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2014(6).
    17. Dagmar Škodová Parmová & Jana Novotná, 2022. "Implementation of quality improvements and innovations in agricultural enterprises," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(6), pages 207-218.
    18. Sun, Lin & Gómez, Miguel I. & Chaddad, Fabio R. & Ross, R. Brent, 2014. "Distribution Channel Choices of Wineries in Emerging Cool Climate Regions," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Smith, Bobby J. II & Kaiser, Harry M. & Gómez, Miguel I., 2013. "Identifying Factors Influencing a Hospital’s Decision to Adopt a Farm-to-Hospital Program," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 42(3), pages 1-10.
    20. Caroline Roussy & Aude Ridier & Karim Chaïb, 2014. "Adoption d’innovations par les agriculteurs : rôle des perceptions et des préférences," Post-Print hal-01123427, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pawjal:236901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://tuspubs.tuskegee.edu/pawj/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.