IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/joafsc/362747.html

Food recalls: An unnecessary and preventable factor in food waste

Author

Listed:
  • Morawicki , Rubén

Abstract

First paragraphs: Food recalls are initiated by food manufacturers or mandated by regulatory agencies when a problem that can harm the public is identified. Recalls take place after the products have left the processing facility and are no longer under the processor’s control, and their primary goal is to minimize harm by retrieving as much product as possible from the market. Not all recalls have the same gravity. In the U.S., food recalls are classified by the U.S. Depart­ment of Agriculture (USDA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) into three classes based on the severity of health risks, with Class I being the most severe; a Class I recall is for defec­tive products that can cause severe health effects or death (FDA, 2024, p. 7-1; UDSA Food Safety and Inspection Service [USDA FSIS], 2024-b). Recalls can be partial or total, depending on how efficient a processor is in codifying and trac­ing different lots of products. Depending on the issue, if the lot sizes are relatively small, recalls can be contained to just the affected lots. However, if there is no clear separation between lots or their size is significantly large, more expansive recalls are required. When lots are not clearly identified, a total recall of all products in the market may be necessary. An example of this was the multistate recall by the Peanut Corporation of America in 2009 due to its peanut butter being contaminated with Salmonella typhimurium (CDC, 2009). In this recall, more than 3,900 different types of products were retrieved from the market from 46 U.S. states (Flynn, 2009). Once the recalled product is in the processor’s hands, the next step is determining what to do with it. This may involve rework, utilization for other uses, or disposal, the latter being, in most cases, the safer and most cost-effective choice. When dis­posal is chosen, landfilling and incineration are options for solid products, while liquids are gener­ally dumped into a drain. Regardless of the discard­ing method, the once-edible product becomes food waste. . . .

Suggested Citation

  • Morawicki , Rubén, 2025. "Food recalls: An unnecessary and preventable factor in food waste," Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, Center for Transformative Action, Cornell University, vol. 14(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/362747/files/1295.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Marsh & Ted Schroeder & James Mintert, 2004. "Impacts of meat product recalls on consumer demand in the USA," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(9), pages 897-909.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen Zhou & Shrihari Sridhar & Rafael Becerril-Arreola & Tony Haitao Cui & Yan Dong, 2019. "Promotions as competitive reactions to recalls and their consequences," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 702-722, July.
    2. Sun, Changyou, 2015. "An investigation of China's import demand for wood pulp and wastepaper," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 113-121.
    3. Luke, Jaime R. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Brown, D. Scott, 2024. "Wholesale pork demand: Understanding primal-level heterogeneity," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    4. Jura Liaukonyte & Nadia A. Streletskaya & Harry M. Kaiser, 2015. "The Long-Term Impact of Positive and Negative Information on Food Demand," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 63(4), pages 539-562, December.
    5. Peake, Whitney O. & Detre, Joshua D. & Carlson, Clinton C., 2014. "One bad apple spoils the bunch? An exploration of broad consumption changes in response to food recalls," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 13-22.
    6. Ollinger, Michael & Moore, Danna L., 2007. "Market Forces, Plant Technology, and Food Safety Technology Use," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon 9853, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    7. Long He & Ying Rong & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen, 2020. "Product Sourcing and Distribution Strategies under Supply Disruption and Recall Risks," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(1), pages 9-23, January.
    8. repec:ags:aaea22:335852 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Yadavalli, Anita & Jones, Keithly, 2014. "Does media influence consumer demand? The case of lean finely textured beef in the United States," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 219-227.
    10. Taylor, Mykel & Klaiber, H. Allen & Kuchler, Fred, 2016. "Changes in U.S. consumer response to food safety recalls in the shadow of a BSE scare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 56-64.
    11. Matthew Houser & Jeffrey H Dorfman & Roderick M Rejesus, 2019. "The Long‐Term Effects of Meat Recalls on Futures Markets," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(2), pages 235-248, June.
    12. M. P. McCullough & T. L. Marsh & R. Huffaker, 2013. "Reconstructing market reactions to consumption harms," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 173-179, February.
    13. K. Sudhir & Nathan Yang, 2014. "Exploiting the Choice-Consumption Mismatch: A New Approach to Disentangle State Dependence and Heterogeneity," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1941, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    14. Beach, Robert H. & Zhen, Chen, 2008. "Consumer Purchasing Behavior in Response to Media Coverage of Avian Influenza," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6750, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Rosa Ferrer & Helena Perrone, 2023. "Consumers’ Costly Responses to Product-Harm Crises," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(5), pages 2639-2671, May.
    16. Lijia Mo, 2013. "Impact of food safety information on US poultry demand," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(9), pages 1121-1131, March.
    17. Alfred Z. Liu & Angela Xia Liu & Sangkil Moon & Donald Siegel, 2024. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Always Result in More Ethical Decision-Making? Evidence from Product Recall Remediation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(3), pages 443-463, May.
    18. Glynn Tonsor & Ted Schroeder, 2015. "Market impacts of E. Coli vaccination in U.S. Feedlot cattle," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Jafarzadeh Ghazi, Amirhossein & Karray, Salma & Azad, Nader, 2023. "Price and quality competition while envisioning a quality-related product recall," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 486-501.
    20. Hsu, Liwu & Lawrence, Benjamin, 2016. "The role of social media and brand equity during a product recall crisis: A shareholder value perspective," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 59-77.
    21. Levan Elbakidze & Linda Highfield & Michael Ward & Bruce A. McCarl & Bo Norby, 2009. "Economics Analysis of Mitigation Strategies for FMD Introduction in Highly Concentrated Animal Feeding Regions," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 31(4), pages 931-950, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:joafsc:362747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.