IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlaare/30819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Market Use By Oklahoma Lamb Producers

Author

Listed:
  • Koontz, Stephen R.
  • Ward, Clement E.

Abstract

Socioeconomic and production system characteristics of a sample of Oklahoma sheep producers were employed to examine the decision to use or not use an electronic market for slaughter lambs. Producer attributes that influence electronic market use were identified with qualitative choice models. The results help identify characteristics of electronic markets which influence their success. The findings also have implications about educational opportunities for cooperative extension.

Suggested Citation

  • Koontz, Stephen R. & Ward, Clement E., 1993. "Electronic Market Use By Oklahoma Lamb Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30819
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30819/files/18010070.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.30819?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Russell, James R. & Purcell, Wayne D., 1980. "Implementation of Electronic Marketing of Slaughter Cattle in Virginia: Requirements and Procedures," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 77-84, July.
    2. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    3. Ward, Clement E., 1984. "An Empirical Study Of Competition In The Price Discovery Process For Slaughter Lambs," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Steven C. Turner & James E. Epperson & Stanley M. Fletcher, 1983. "Producer Attitudes toward Multicommodity Electronic Marketing," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(4), pages 818-822.
    5. Lee, Jonq-Ying, 1986. "Imputed Missing Incomes And Marginal Propensity To Consume Food," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(2), pages 1-8, December.
    6. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1981. "Qualitative Response Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1483-1536, December.
    7. Thomas L. Sporleder, 1984. "Implications of Electronic Trading for the Structure of Agricultural Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 859-863.
    8. Schrader, Lee F., 1984. "Implications Of Electronic Trading For Agricultural Prices," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279041, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. W. Timothy Rhodus & E. Dean Baldwin & Dennis R. Henderson, 1989. "Pricing Accuracy and Efficiency in a Pilot Electronic Hog Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 874-882.
    10. Lee F. Schrader, 1984. "Implications of Electronic Trading for Agricultural Prices," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(5), pages 854-858.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gripp, Sharon I. & Luloff, A.E. & Yonkers, Robert D., 1994. "Reporting Response Rates For Telephone Surveys Used In Agricultural Economics Research," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-7, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Natanelov, Valeri & McKenzie, Andrew M. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2013. "Crude oil–corn–ethanol – nexus: A contextual approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 504-513.
    2. J. E. Epperson & M. H. So & S. M. Fletcher & D. H. Carley, 1988. "Profile analysis of market participants' attitudes toward selected market alternatives for US shelled peanuts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 433-452.
    3. Czupryna Marcin & Oleksy Paweł, 2018. "The Effect of an Electronic Exchange on Prices and Return Volatility in the Fine Wine Market," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 22-35, December.
    4. Sheikh, A. D. & Rehman, T. & Yates, C. M., 2003. "Logit models for identifying the factors that influence the uptake of new `no-tillage' technologies by farmers in the rice-wheat and the cotton-wheat farming systems of Pakistan's Punjab," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 79-95, January.
    5. Norris, Patricia E. & Batie, Sandra S., 1987. "Virginia Farmers' Soil Conservation Decisions: An Application Of Tobit Analysis," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Sidibe, Amadou, 2005. "Farm-level adoption of soil and water conservation techniques in northern Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(3), pages 211-224, February.
    7. Turner, Steven C., 1987. "Rumblings from Communication Theory and A More Complete Evaluative Framework for Price Discovery Mechanisms," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269967, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Zepeda, Lydia, 1991. "Simultaneity of Technology Adoption and Productivity," Staff Papers 200536, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    9. Jean-Louis Fusillier & Lionel Richefort, 2010. "Imitation, rationalité et adoption de technologies d’irrigation améliorées à l’île de la Réunion," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 193(2), pages 59-73.
    10. Feleke, Shiferaw & Zegeye, Tesfaye, 2006. "Adoption of improved maize varieties in Southern Ethiopia: Factors and strategy options," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 442-457, October.
    11. Joshua D. Detre & Hiroki Uematsu & Ashok K. Mishra, 2011. "The influence of GM crop adoption on the profitability of farms operated by young and beginning farmers," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(1), pages 41-61, May.
    12. P. K. Kwakyi & J. E. Epperson & S. M. Fletcher & D. H. Carley, 1989. "Probit analysis of market participants' attitudes toward selected market alternatives for us farmers' stock peanuts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 107-119.
    13. Perry, Janet E. & Mishra, Ashok K., 1999. "Forward Contracting Of Inputs: A Farm-Level Analysis," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 17(2), pages 1-15.
    14. Oliver Musshoff & Norbert Hirschauer, 2011. "A behavioral economic analysis of bounded rationality in farm financing decisions," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 71(1), pages 62-83, May.
    15. Läpple, Doris & Rensburg, Tom Van, 2011. "Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(7), pages 1406-1414, May.
    16. Vaiknoras, Kate A. & Larochelle, Catherine & Birol, Ekin & Asare-Marfo, Dorene & Herrington, Caitlin, 2017. "The Roles of Formal and Informal Delivery Approaches in Achieving Fast and Sustained Adoption of Biofortified Crops: Learnings from the Iron Bean Delivery Approaches in Rwanda," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258288, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Ouma, James Okuro & De Groote, Hugo & Owuor, George, 2006. "Determinants of Improved Maize Seed and Fertilizer Use in Kenya: Policy Implications," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25433, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Mooney, Daniel F. & Barham, Bradford L. & Lian, Chang, 2013. "Sustainable Biofuels, Marginal Agricultural Lands, and Farm Supply Response: Micro-Evidence for Southwest Wisconsin," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150510, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Mazvimavi, Kizito & Twomlow, Steve, 2009. "Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 20-29, June.
    20. Alexander, Corinne E., 2002. "The Role Of Seed Company Supplied Information In Farmers' Decisions," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19617, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Livestock Production/Industries; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlaare:30819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/waeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.