IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijofsd/345315.html

The Role of Inter‐Organisational Relations and Networks in Agribusiness: The Case for the Polish Fruit and Vegetable Industry

Author

Listed:
  • inter‐organisational network relationship; network approach; agribusiness network; fruit and vegetable
  • processing industry

Abstract

This paper contributes to the ongoing discussions on the benefits of inter‐organisational networks (IONs) in agribusiness. It is based on the field of inter‐organisational relations (IORs) and network approaches that are applied in the framework of the Activities‐Resources‐Actors (ARA) model. The aim of this paper is to recognise and evaluate the distinguishing features of network relationships, which lead to better defined networks in agribusiness. Polish fruit and vegetable producers, processors and traders were investigated in this study. The study reveals that the main objectives of network relationships are to increase profits, this is linked to the optimisation of supplies and provisions, the building of communities and relationships and sustainable development. The outcomes of network relationships have been recognised as the non‐transactional exchange of knowledge and information, mutual adaptations, adjustments and standardisations. They are led by strong transactional relationships in the supply chain, which are based on pricing conditions, terms of payments, formal contracts and cooperation. This study distinguishes five categories of inter‐organisational network relationships they are: very strong operational, strong sustainable, moderate social, weak innovative and very weak shared resources. The paper concludes that the studied networks are characterised by strong activity and actor ties and weak resources bonds. Specifically the lack of shared resources might negatively influence the networks innovation and sustainability in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • inter‐organisational network relationship; network approach; agribusiness network; fruit and vegetable & processing industry, 2019. "The Role of Inter‐Organisational Relations and Networks in Agribusiness: The Case for the Polish Fruit and Vegetable Industry," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(02), January.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345315
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345315/files/THE%20ROLE%20OF%20INTER%E2%80%90ORGANISATIONAL%20RELATIONS%20AND%20NETWORKS%20IN%20AGRIBUSINESS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claude Ménard & Peter G. Klein, 2004. "Organizational Issues in the Agrifood Sector: Toward a Comparative Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 86(3), pages 750-755.
    2. Perdomo, Silvia Andrea Pérez & Farrow, Andrew & Trienekens, Jacques H. & Omta, Onno (S.W.F.) & van der Velde, Gerben, . "Testing the Effectiveness of Network Governance Mechanisms to Foster Ambidexterity of Agricultural Innovation Networks in East and Central Africa," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2).
    3. Nasuelli, Piero & Clemente, Flavia & Baggio, Rodolfo & Berruto, Remigio & Busato, Patrizia, 2015. "Supply Chains of Products of Animal Origin: A Complex Network Model for Strategic Management," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Alessandro Scuderi & Luisa Sturiale, 2014. "Analysis of social network applications for organic agrifood products," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 176-189.
    5. Sterns, James A. & Schweikhardt, David B. & Peterson, H. Christopher, 1998. "Using Case Studies As An Approach For Conducting Agribusiness Research," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 1(3), pages 1-17.
    6. Håkansson, Håkan & Snehota, Ivan, 2006. ""No business is an island" 17 years later," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 271-274, September.
    7. Håkansson, Håkan & Snehota, Ivan, 1989. "No business is an island: The network concept of business strategy," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 187-200.
    8. Tepic, M. & Trienekens, Jacques H. & Hoste, R. & Omta, S.W.F. (Onno), . "The Influence of Networking and Absorptive Capacity on the Innovativeness of Farmers in the Dutch Pork Sector," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(3), pages 1-34.
    9. Xavier Gellynck & Bert Vermeire & Jacques Viaene, 2007. "Innovation in food firms: contribution of regional networks within the international business context," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(3), pages 209-226, May.
    10. Gërdoçi, Blendi & Skreli, Engjell & Imami, Drini, 2016. "Determinants of Sustainable Relationships in the Albanian Apple Production Sector," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 7(01), pages 1-16, February.
    11. Lie, Helene & Rich, Karl M., 2016. "Improving Value Chains for Dairy Farmers in Matiguás, Nicaragua: a System Dynamics Approach," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244479, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    12. Clemente, Flavia & Nasuelli, Piero & Baggio, Rodolfo, 2016. "Modelling the Pig Supply Chain: a Network Analysis Applied to the Italian Case," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244542, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    13. Alfred Posch, 2010. "Industrial Recycling Networks as Starting Points for Broader Sustainability‐Oriented Cooperation?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 14(2), pages 242-257, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wiśniewska-Paluszak, Joanna A. & Paluszak, Grzegorz T., "undated". "The Features and Categorization of Agribusiness Networks on the Example of the Polish Fruit and Vegetable Industry Enterprises," 2018 International European Forum (163rd EAAE Seminar), February 5-9, 2018, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 276858, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    2. Drummond, Conor & O'Toole, Thomas & McGrath, Helen, 2022. "Social Media resourcing of an entrepreneurial firm network: Collaborative mobilisation processes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 171-187.
    3. Joanna Wiśniewska-Paluszak & Grzegorz Paluszak, 2021. "The Urban and Peri-Urban Farms (UPFs) Relational Model: The Case of Greater Poland Voivodeship, Poland," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Wiśniewska-Paluszak, Joanna A. & Paluszak, Grzegorz T., . "Development of sustainable resource ties in the agrifood industry: the case for the Polish fruit and vegetable industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(2).
    5. Traversac, Jean-Baptiste & Rousset, Sylvain & Perrier-Cornet, Philippe, 2011. "Farm resources, transaction costs and forward integration in agriculture: Evidence from French wine producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 839-847.
    6. Altair Dias de Moura & Sandra Martin & Diane Mollenkopf, 2009. "Product specification and agribusiness chain coordination: introducing the coordination differential concept," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(1), pages 112-127.
    7. Jarle Aarstad & Olav Andreas Kvitastein & Stig-Erik Jakobsen, 2019. "What Drives Enterprise Product Innovation? Assessing How Regional, National, And International Inter-Firm Collaboration Complement Or Substitute For R&D Investments," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(05), pages 1-25, June.
    8. Mugera, Amin W. & Bitsch, Vera, 2005. "Managing Labor on Dairy Farms: A Resource-Based Perspective with Evidence from Case Studies," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 8(3), pages 1-20.
    9. Stefano Ciliberti & Simone Del Sarto & Angelo Frascarelli & Giulia Pastorelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Contracts to Govern the Transition towards Sustainable Production: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Analysis in the Durum Wheat Sector in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    10. Kimmich, Christian & Fischbacher, Urs, 2016. "Behavioral determinants of supply chain integration and coexistence," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 55-77.
    11. Serena Galvani & Elisa Carloni & Roberta Bocconcelli & Alessandro Pagano, 2022. "From After-Sales to Advanced Services: A Network Analysis on the Impacts of Digital Servitization Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    13. Banterle, Alessandro & Stranieri, Stefanella, 2008. "The consequences of voluntary traceability system for supply chain relationships. An application of transaction cost economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 560-569, December.
    14. Medlin, Christopher J., 2006. "Self and collective interest in business relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(7), pages 858-865, July.
    15. Tylecote, Andrew & Hirata, Mitsuhiro, 1993. "Technological Innovation and Performance Pressures in Europe and Japan," Hitotsubashi Journal of commerce and management, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 28(1), pages 61-76, December.
    16. Joyez, Charlie, 2025. "Robustness with adaptation. Ownership networks of multinationals through COVID-19," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13, pages 1-1, January.
    17. Coppola, A. & Ianuario, S. & Chinnici, G. & Di Vita, G. & Pappalardo, G. & D'Amico, D., 2018. "Endogenous and Exogenous Determinants of Agricultural Productivity: What Is the Most Relevant for the Competitiveness of the Italian Agricultural Systems?," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(2).
    18. Hall, Charles R. & Lyford, Conrad P., 2001. "Industry Strategic Planning And Coordination: The Case Of The Texas Vegetable Industry," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 32(2), pages 1-14, July.
    19. Gellynck, Xavier & Kuhne, Bianka, 2008. "Innovation in Traditional Food Networks," 110th Seminar, February 18-22, 2008, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 49847, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Vermeire, Bert & Gellynck, Xavier, 2007. "Contribution of Cluster Relations to Food Competitiveness in the EU," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6583, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijofsd:345315. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/centmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.