IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ijarit/305384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

QUALITY PERCEPTION OF ORGANICALLY GROWN TOMATOES (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) IN VIENNA, AUSTRIA

Author

Listed:
  • Ng'ang'a, P.K.
  • Vogl, C.R.

Abstract

Austria is one of the major organic tomato producing countries for local and export marketing. These tomatoes are produced in parts of Austria especially around Vienna where their production system has to meet stringent organic quality standards in both local and international markets. These quality standards may put considerable strain on farmers and are normally formulated without famers’ participation so may not be wholly representative of the farmers’ quality interpretation. The aim of this paper is therefore to determine the Austrian organic tomatoes growers’ perception and practice of quality and challenges. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were carried out among 28 organic tomatoes farmers in Vienna, Austria. Findings suggest that quality of organic tomatoes is mainly perceived in terms of both informal values (big fruit size, long shelf life, food security and amount of income received from tomato sales) as well as formal norms (non- application of chemicals, human health, damage free, sweet taste, red colour, and juiciness). There were no gendered differences in quality perception among the growers. High costs of production inputs were identified as the main challenge to attaining quality in organic tomatoes. Following these findings, there is need for effective participation of growers in formulation of standards as well as subsidizing of production inputs by the government. The Austrian tomato growers as well as local and international retailers should work closely to increase the price received by the Austrian organic tomato growers so that it more adequately covers their production costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ng'ang'a, P.K. & Vogl, C.R., 2015. "QUALITY PERCEPTION OF ORGANICALLY GROWN TOMATOES (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) IN VIENNA, AUSTRIA," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 5(2), December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:ijarit:305384
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.305384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/305384/files/26263-Article%20Text-94804-1-10-20160104.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.305384?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Barrett, H. R. & Browne, A. W. & Harris, P. J. C. & Cadoret, K., 2002. "Organic certification and the UK market: organic imports from developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 301-318, August.
    2. Gilles Allaire, 2010. "Applying economic sociology to understand the meaning of “Quality” in food markets," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(s1), pages 167-180, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed, Rezgar & Zheng, Yuqing, 2017. "International Diffusion Of Food Safety Standards: The Role Of Domestic Certifiers And International Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 296-322, May.
    2. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "The Effects of Institutional Measures: Geographical Indication in Mercosur and the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Herzfeld, Thomas & Drescher, Larissa S. & Grebitus, Carola, 2011. "Cross-national adoption of private food quality standards," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 401-411, June.
    4. Padilla Bravo, Carlos Antonio & Spiller, Achim & Villalobos, Pablo, 2012. "Are Organic Growers Satisfied with the Certification System? A Causal Analysis of Farmers’ Perceptions in Chile," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(4), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Raynolds, Laura T., 2004. "The Globalization of Organic Agro-Food Networks," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 725-743, May.
    6. Agus Dwi Nugroho & Zoltan Lakner, 2022. "Impact of economic globalisation on agriculture in developing countries: A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(5), pages 180-188.
    7. Maze, Armelle, 2005. "Integrated Agriculture Labelling and consumer information: retailer's strategies and regulatory issues in the European context," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19175, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Sylvaine Lemeilleur & Gilles Allaire, 2016. "Standardisation and guarantee systems: what can participatory certification offer?," Working Papers hal-01594049, HAL.
    9. Lambare, Pierre & Derville, Marie & You, Gerard, 2018. "Quelles conditions d’accès au marché des éleveurs après les quotas laitiers ?‪," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 364(April-Jun).
    10. Oelofse, Myles & Høgh-Jensen, Henning & Abreu, Lucimar S. & Almeida, Gustavo F. & Hui, Qiao Yu & Sultan, Tursinbek & de Neergaard, Andreas, 2010. "Certified organic agriculture in China and Brazil: Market accessibility and outcomes following adoption," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1785-1793, July.
    11. Gaëlle Petit & Caroline C. Sablayrolles & Gwenola Yannou-Le Bris, 2018. "Combining eco-social and environmental indicators to assess the sustainability performance of a food value chain: A case study," Post-Print hal-01813496, HAL.
    12. Marie-Vivien, Delphine & Biénabe, Estelle, 2017. "The Multifaceted Role of the State in the Protection of Geographical Indications: A Worldwide Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 1-11.
    13. Carmen Bain & Tamera Dandachi, 2014. "Governing GMOs: The (Counter) Movement for Mandatory and Voluntary Non-GMO Labels," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Guilherme Silva Fracarolli, 2021. "Mapping Online Geographical Indication: Agrifood Products on E-Commerce Shelves of Mercosur and the European Union," Economies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Garcia Martinez, Marian & Banados, Felipe, 2004. "Impact of EU organic product certification legislation on Chile organic exports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-14, February.
    16. Gabriele Jahn & Matthias Schramm & Achim Spiller, 2005. "The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 53-73, December.
    17. Jessica Goldberger, 2008. "Non-governmental organizations, strategic bridge building, and the “scientization” of organic agriculture in Kenya," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 25(2), pages 271-289, June.
    18. Caswell, Julie A. & Boys, Kathryn A. & Danilow, Alyssa A. & Lynch, Kathryn E., 2017. "Food Certification Industry Capacity and Ability to Comply with FSMA Final Rule on Accredited Third-Party Certification," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258468, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Mohamed Akli Achabou & Sihem Dekhili & Mohamed Hamdoun, 2017. "Environmental Upgrading of Developing Country Firms in Global Value Chains," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 224-238, February.
    20. Irshad Hussain Sarki & Raheela Haque & Asif Mahmood & Muhammad Noman Yaseen & Muhammad Sufyan Khawar & Asad Qayoom & Saif Ur Rehman, 2023. "Factors Influencing Green Purchase Intention: A Mediation Moderation Study," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 652-664.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ijarit:305384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijarit.webs.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.