IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abq/ijasd1/v5y2023i3p90-103.html

Rice Production, Quality, and Nutrition: A Comprehensive Review on Challenges, Opportunities, and Global Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Hina Sarfaraz

    (Government College University Lahore)

Abstract

Improving rice's quality can significantly raise its worth for growers and consumers alike. This comprehensive review addresses the multifaceted aspects of rice, the staple food for over half the global population, and delves into the challenges and opportunities associated with its production, quality, and nutritional enhancement. It highlights the pervasive issue of micronutrient malnutrition affecting billions and the pressing need for sustainable solutions. The intricate connection between rice production and environmental changes, coupled with the looming challenges of climate change, is thoroughly explored. The paper emphasizes the role of quality control throughout the rice value chain, shedding light on the diverse factors influencing rice preferences and the economic implications of premium varieties. Micronutrient deficiencies, including iron, zinc, and selenium, pose significant health risks, particularly in underdeveloped regions. The review underscores the potential of rice bio-fortificationas apromising strategy for long-term nutritional security. It draws attention to the disparities in approaches between developed and economically challenged nations, advocating for cost-effective methods to enhance the nutritional content of widely consumed cereals. The analysis of the global rice production landscape, with a focus on Thailand's premium varieties and India's Basmati rice, unveils the intricate interplay of market dynamics, policies, and consumer preferences. The paper provides insights into the challenges faced by the Basmati rice industry in Pakistan, attributing stagnation to inadequate research and development investments and a lack of policy commitment. The historical evolution of rice varieties and the impact of ecological and socioeconomic factors on rice types and grades are discussed. The distinctions between Indica and Japonica rice varieties, along with the varying amylose content, highlight the complexity of rice diversity on a global scale. Furthermore, the review examines contemporary challenges in Asian rice farming, emphasizing the importance of management techniques and selective breeding in improving overall quality. It delves into the complexities of rice grain quality, including the influence of environmental factors, post-harvest treatments, and economic considerations in the rice trade. In conclusion, this comprehensive review provides a nuanced understanding of the intricate world of rice production, addressing issues ranging from nutritional security to market dynamics. It serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders seeking to navigate the complexities of rice cultivation in a changing global landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Hina Sarfaraz, 2023. "Rice Production, Quality, and Nutrition: A Comprehensive Review on Challenges, Opportunities, and Global Perspectives," International Journal of Agriculture & Sustainable Development, 50sea, vol. 5(3), pages 90-103, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:abq:ijasd1:v:5:y:2023:i:3:p:90-103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.xdgen.com/index.php/ijasd/article/view/199/215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journal.xdgen.com/index.php/ijasd/article/view/199
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1986. "Consumer Demand for Rice Grain Quality and Returns to Research for Quality Improvement in Southeast Asia," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(3), pages 634-641.
    2. Asian Development Bank Institute, 2018. "Investment in Research and Development for Basmati Rice in Pakistan," Working Papers id:12951, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mishili, Fulgence J. & Temu, Anna A. & Fulton, Joan R. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2009. "Consumer preferences as drivers of the common bean trade in Tanzania: A marketing perspective," Staff Papers 48658, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    2. Hisaki KONO & Ernst DAVID & Tsilavo RALANDISON & Yutaka ARIMOTO, 2025. "Quality-Driven Price Dispersion:Implications for Testing Market Efficiency," Discussion papers e-25-004, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    3. Salayo, Nerissa D., 2000. "Investment Opportunities for the Shrimp Processing Industry in the Philippines: Results from a Hedonic Analysis," Discussion Papers DP 2000-12, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
    4. Brockmeier, M., 1994. "Messung und Bewertung der Nahrungsmittelqualität auf der Basis von Produkteigenschaften," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 30.
    5. Devadoss, S. & Araji, A. A., 1993. "Impacts 0F Breeding And Crop Management Research In Classes Of Wheat On Economic Returns And Exports," A.E. Research Series 305100, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    6. Maredia, Mywish K. & Raitzer, David A., 2012. "Review and analysis of documented patterns of agricultural research impacts in Southeast Asia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 46-58.
    7. Chenhall, Daranee & Fraser, Rob W., 1990. "Beef Quality Preferences in Western Australia," 1990 Conference (34th), February 13-15, 1990, Brisbane, Australia 144924, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Alston, Julian M., 1991. "Research Benefits in a Multimarket Setting: A Review," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 59(01), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Capalbo, Susan Marie & Heggem, Christine N., 1998. "Evaluating Telemedicine In Rural Settings: Issues And Applications," Research Discussion Papers 29240, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    10. Brennan, John P., 1989. "An Analysis Of The Economic Potential Of Some Innovations In A Wheat Breeding Programme," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(01), pages 1-8, April.
    11. Tun-Hsiang Yu & C. Phillip Baumel & Marty J. McVey & Jerry L. Sell, 2001. "Economics of the use of imported U.S. high oil corn in swine and poultry rations in Taiwan," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 539-556.
    12. Adesina, Akinwumi A. & Baidu-Forson, Jojo, 1995. "Farmers' perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, October.
    13. T. J. P. Voon, 1992. "A Cross‐Commodity Appraisal Of Demand‐Raising Research Benefits: Pork And Chicken In Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(2), pages 243-247, May.
    14. Bairagi, Subir K. & Mohanty, Samarendu & Ynion, Jhoanne & Demont, Matty, "undated". "Determinants of Consumer Preferences for Rice Attributes: Evidence from South and Southeast Asia," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258384, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. repec:plo:pone00:0150345 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Matin Qaim & Alexander J. Stein & J. V. Meenakshi, 2007. "Economics of biofortification," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 37(s1), pages 119-133, December.
    17. J. P. Voon & G. W. Edwards, 1991. "Research Payoff From Quality Improvement: The Case Of Backfat Depth In Pigs," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 66-76, January.
    18. Martinez, Steve & Zering, Kelly, "undated". "Vertical Coordination and Consumer Welfare: The Case of the Pork Industry," Agricultural Economic Reports 262048, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    19. Martinez, Steve W. & Smith, Kevin E. & Zering, Kelly D., 1998. "Analysis of Changing Methods of Vertical Coordination in the Pork Industry," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 301-311, December.
    20. Thirtle, C. & Bottomley, P., 1988. "Explaining Total Factor Productivity Change: Returns to R & D in U.K. Agricultural Research," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232809, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    21. Dey, Madan Mohan & Kumar, Praduman & Chen, Oai Li & Khan, Md. Akhtaruzzaman & Barik, Nagesh Kumar & Li, Luping & Nissapa, Ayut & Pham, Ngoc Sao, 2013. "Potential impact of genetically improved carp strains in Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 306-320.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abq:ijasd1:v:5:y:2023:i:3:p:90-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqra Nazeer (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.