Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Is there monopsonistic discrimination against immigrants? First evidence from linked employer-employee data

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hirsch, Boris
  • Jahn, Elke J.

Abstract

This paper investigates immigrants' and natives' labour supply to the firm within a semi-structural approach based on a dynamic monopsony framework. Applying duration models to a large administrative employer-employee data set for Germany, we find that once accounting for unobserved worker heterogeneity immi-grants supply labour less elastically to firms than natives. Under monopsonistic wage setting the estimated elasticity differential predicts a 4.7 log points wage penalty for immigrants thereby accounting for almost the entire unexplained native-immigrant wage differential of 2.9-5.9 log points. Our results imply that employers profit from discriminating against immigrants. -- Mithilfe eines semistrukturellen Schätzansatzes, der auf ei-nem dynamischen Monopsonmodell beruht, untersuchen wir das Arbeitsangebot von Immigranten und Einheimischen auf Firmenebene. Unter Verwendung von Verweil-dauermodellen und eines großen administrativen Firmen-Beschäftigten-Datensatzes für Deutschland finden wir, dass Immigranten eine geringere Arbeitsangebotselasti-zität auf Firmenebene aufweisen als Einheimische, sofern für unbeobachtete Personenheterogenität kontrolliert wird. Wird monopsonistische Lohnsetzung unter-stellt, so folgt aus den gefundenen Elastizitätsunterschieden ein Lohnabschlag für Immigranten von 4.7 Logpunkten. Dies entspricht nahezu dem gesamten unerklärten Lohndifferential zwischen Immigranten und Einheimischen in Höhe von 2.9-5.9 Log-punkten. Unsere Ergebnisse implizieren, dass Arbeitgeber von Lohndiskriminierung gegen Immigranten profitieren.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/66787/1/730109895.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour and Regional Economics in its series Discussion Papers with number 79.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:zbw:faulre:79

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.arbeitsmarkt.wiso.uni-erlangen.de/english-version/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: monopsony; native-immigrant wage differential; discrimination; Germany;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:faulre:79

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (ZBW - German National Library of Economics).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.