Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective

Contents:

Author Info

  • Richard Clarida
  • Jordi Galí

    ()

  • Mark Gertler

Abstract

This paper reviews the recent literature on monetary policy rules. We exposit the monetary policy design problem within a simple baseline theoretical framework. We then consider the implications of adding various real world complications. Among other things, we show that the optimal policy implicitly incorporates inflation targeting. We also characterize the gains from making credible commitments to fight inflation. In contrast to conventional wisdom, we show that gains from commitment may emerge even in the central bank is not trying to inadvisedly push output above its natural level. We also consider the implications of frictions such as imperfect information.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.econ.upf.edu/docs/papers/downloads/356.pdf
File Function: Whole Paper
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra in its series Economics Working Papers with number 356.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Sep 1997
Date of revision: Apr 1999
Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:356

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.econ.upf.edu/

Related research

Keywords: Monetary policy; credibility; stabilization; new keynesian models;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Could the Shadow Open Market Committee have outperfomed the Fed?
    by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2011-05-10 13:51:00
  2. Manuel Arellano recibe el premio Jaime I de Economía.
    by Cives in Politikon on 2012-06-05 17:13:35
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.

Lists

This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
  1. Economic Logic blog
  2. Top 1‰ items by number of citations
  3. Top 1‰ items by number of citations weighted by simple impact factors
  4. Top 1‰ items by number of citations weighted by recursive impact factors
  5. Top 1‰ items by number of citations discounted by age
  6. Top 1‰ items by number of citations weighted by simple impact factors and discounted by age
  7. Top 1‰ items by number of citations weighted by recursive impact factors and discounted by age
  8. Nueva Economía Keynesiana in Wikipedia (Spanish)

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:356

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.