IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/cup/cbooks/9780521424585.html

Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. Noghin, Vladimir D., 2006. "An axiomatization of the generalized Edgeworth-Pareto principle in terms of choice functions," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 210-216, September.
  2. Horan, Sean Michael, 2021. "Agendas in legislative decision-making," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(1), January.
  3. Abhinaba Lahiri & Anup Pramanik, 2020. "On strategy-proof social choice between two alternatives," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 54(4), pages 581-607, April.
  4. Rogna, Marco, 2021. "The central core and the mid-central core as novel set-valued and point-valued solution concepts for transferable utility coalitional games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 1-11.
  5. Echenique, Federico, 2007. "Counting combinatorial choice rules," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 58(2), pages 231-245, February.
  6. Elena Panova, 2023. "Sharing cost of network among users with differentiated willingness to pay," Post-Print hal-04556220, HAL.
  7. Soesja Grundel & Peter Borm & Herbert Hamers, 2013. "Resource allocation games: a compromise stable extension of bankruptcy games," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 78(2), pages 149-169, October.
  8. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2013. "A Multi-attribute Yardstick Auction without Prior Scoring," MSAP Working Paper Series 02_2013, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics, revised Mar 2014.
  9. José Carlos R. Alcantud, 2013. "The impossibility of social evaluations of infinite streams with strict inequality aversion," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 1(2), pages 123-130, November.
  10. Can, Burak & Leth Hougaard, Jens & Pourpouneh, Mohsen, 2022. "On reward sharing in blockchain mining pools," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 274-298.
  11. Grundel, S. & Borm, P.E.M. & Hamers, H.J.M., 2011. "A Compromise Stable Extension of Bankruptcy Games : Multipurpose Resource Allocation," Discussion Paper 2011-029, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
  12. Alejandro Caparrós & Esther Blanco & Philipp Buchenauer & Michael Finus, 2020. "Team Formation in Coordination Games with Fixed Neighborhoods," Working Papers 2004, Instituto de Políticas y Bienes Públicos (IPP), CSIC.
  13. Oleg CHISLOV & Viktor BOGACHEV & Vyacheslav ZADOROZHNIY & Alexandra KRAVETS & Maksim BAKALOV & Taras BOGACHEV, 2021. "Mathematical Modeling Of Cargo Flow Distribution In A Regional Multimodal Transportation System," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 16(2), pages 153-165, June.
  14. Abe, Takaaki & Lowing, David & Nakada, Satoshi, 2025. "Fair allocation in hierarchies: A compromise between marginalism and egalitarianism," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
  15. Harold D. Chiang & Antonio F. Galvao & Chia-Min Wei, 2026. "Panel Quantile Regression with Common Shocks," Papers 2602.19201, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  16. Aymeric Lardon, 2015. "The Core of Voting Games: A Partition Approach," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(03), pages 1-9.
  17. Fuhito Kojima & M. Ünver, 2014. "The “Boston” school-choice mechanism: an axiomatic approach," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 55(3), pages 515-544, April.
  18. Macé, Antonin, 2018. "Voting with evaluations: Characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 10-17.
  19. Juarez, Ruben & Ko, Chiu Yu & Xue, Jingyi, 2018. "Sharing sequential values in a network," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 734-779.
  20. Elizabeth Maggie Penn, 2019. "Introduction to a special issue in honor of Kenneth Arrow," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 179(1), pages 1-6, April.
  21. Panova, Elena, 2022. "Sharing cost of network among users with differentiated willingness to pay," TSE Working Papers 22-1356, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Mar 2023.
  22. Echenique, Federico & Ivanov, Lozan, 2011. "Implications of Pareto efficiency for two-agent (household) choice," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 129-136, March.
  23. Reuben, Ernesto & Riedl, Arno, 2013. "Enforcement of contribution norms in public good games with heterogeneous populations," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 122-137.
  24. Doğan, Serhat & Yıldız, Kemal, 2021. "Odds supermodularity and the Luce rule," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 443-452.
  25. Alex Coram, 2006. "Social choice with a continuous ordering function," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2006-09, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
  26. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2012. "A Simple Multi-attribute Yardstick Auction Without Prior Scoring," MSAP Working Paper Series 02_2012, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
  27. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane, 2010. "Cooperation among liquefied natural gas suppliers: Is rationalization the sole objective?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 933-947, July.
  28. Kivinen, Steven, 2024. "Equitable, neutral, and efficient voting rules," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
  29. Barbaro Salvatore, 2025. "Wie sollten wir unseren Bundestag wählen?," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 26(4), pages 472-480.
  30. Christian Basteck, 2022. "Characterising scoring rules by their solution in iteratively undominated strategies," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(1), pages 161-208, July.
  31. Ali I. Ozkes & M. Remzi Sanver, 2021. "Anonymous, neutral, and resolute social choice revisited," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 57(1), pages 97-113, July.
  32. Sergey Kuznetsov & Juliia Rastova & Miron Rastov, 2017. "Rating Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Russian Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 137-146.
  33. Federico Echenique & Teddy Mekonnen & M. Bumin Yenmez, 2026. "Endogenous Inequality Aversion: Decision criteria for triage and other ethical tradeoffs," Papers 2601.22250, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
  34. Núñez, Matías & Sanver, M. Remzi, 2017. "Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 9-17.
  35. Antonin Macé, 2017. "Voting with evaluations: characterizations of evaluative voting and range voting," Working Papers halshs-01222200, HAL.
  36. Panova, Elena, 2023. "Sharing cost of network among users with differentiated willingness to pay," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 666-689.
  37. Xiangyu Qu, 2024. "Inequality measurement with coarse data," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 62(2), pages 367-396, March.
  38. Alex Coram, 2008. "Social choice and information: a note on the calculus of mappings from utility spaces," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2008-04, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
  39. Luis Corchon & Simon Wilkie, 1996. "Double implementation of the ratio correspondence by a market mechanism," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 2(1), pages 325-337, December.
  40. Edith Elkind & Piotr Faliszewski & Arkadii Slinko, 2015. "Distance rationalization of voting rules," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 45(2), pages 345-377, September.
  41. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
  42. Li, Wenzhong & Xu, Genjiu & van den Brink, René, 2024. "Sign properties and axiomatizations of the weighted division values," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
  43. Kamionko, V. & Marakulin, V., 2020. "Shapley's value and its axiomatization in games with prior probabilities of coalition formation," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 46(2), pages 12-29.
  44. Ali Ihsan Ozkes & M. Remzi Sanver, 2017. "Procedural versus Opportunity-Wise Equal Treatment of Alternatives: Neutrality Revisited," AMSE Working Papers 1736, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
  45. Federico Echenique & Joseph Root & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2022. "Efficiency in Random Resource Allocation and Social Choice," Papers 2203.06353, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
  46. Antonin Macé, 2015. "Voting with Evaluations: When Should We Sum? What Should We Sum?," AMSE Working Papers 1544, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised 29 Oct 2015.
  47. Martin L. Weitzman, 2015. "A Voting Architecture for the Governance of Free-Driver Externalities, with Application to Geoengineering," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 117(4), pages 1049-1068, October.
  48. Takashi Hayashi, 2016. "Consistent updating of social welfare functions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 46(3), pages 569-608, March.
  49. Rajat Deb & Laura Razzolini & Tae Seo, 2006. "The conservative equal costs rule, the serial cost sharing rule and the pivotal mechanism: asymptotic welfare loss comparisons for the case of an excludable public project," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 10(3), pages 205-232, December.
  50. Bade, Sophie, 2019. "Matching with single-peaked preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 81-99.
  51. Jens Leth Hougaard & Kurt Nielsen & Athanasios Papakonstantinou, 2016. "A Sealed-Bid Two-Attribute Yardstick Auction Without Prior Scoring," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 827-843, July.
  52. Natalya Gennadievna Dzhurka, 2021. "Research on Spatial Economic Interactions: A Cooperative Game Theory Approach," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 1, pages 144-162.
  53. Anisha Bandyopadhyay & Sinan Ertemel & Rajnish Kumar & Saptarshi Mukherjee, 2026. "Integrating Proportionality and Egalitarianism in Claims Problems," Papers 2605.26948, arXiv.org.
  54. Lyu, Xiaohuan & Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Schulte, Frederik, 2025. "The collaborative berth allocation problem with row-generation algorithms for stable cost allocations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(3), pages 888-906.
  55. Yan Long, 2019. "Strategy-proof group selection under single-peaked preferences over group size," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(3), pages 579-608, October.
  56. Ng, W. -Y. & Choi, K. -W. & Shum, K. -H., 1996. "Arbitrated matching: Formulation and protocol," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 348-357, January.
  57. Barbaro, Salvatore, 2025. "Election methods and political polarization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  58. Morimitsu Kurino & Tetsutaro Hatakeyama, 2022. "Inter-attribute equity in assignment problems: Leveling the playing field by priority design," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2022-009, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
  59. Koji Yokote & Takumi Kongo & Yukihiko Funaki, 2021. "Correction to: Redistribution to the less productive: parallel characterizations of the egalitarian Shapley and consensus values," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 99-99, July.
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.