IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/matsoc/v135y2025ics0165489625000320.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Election methods and political polarization

Author

Listed:
  • Barbaro, Salvatore

Abstract

Political polarization poses a significant challenge to democratic societies. While much of the scholarly focus has been on the socio-demographic factors that drive polarization, this paper focuses on voting rules and their effects on the incentives for candidates to be moderate or polarizing. It addresses the question: Which voting methods most impede the success of a polarizing candidate? Through a comparative analysis of plurality voting, the Condorcet method, and Borda’s rule, we find the Borda rule to be the most effective at discouraging extreme platforms. In a generalization, we show that a scoring rule is more effective at hindering the success of polarizing candidates the more weight that it places on voters’ second preferences in the tallying process.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbaro, Salvatore, 2025. "Election methods and political polarization," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0165489625000320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165489625000320
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2025.102417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Elections; Voting rules; Political polarization; Scoring rules;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:matsoc:v:135:y:2025:i:c:s0165489625000320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/505565 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.