IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hsgmed/202502.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Swiss hospital financing with DRGs: Are there treatments/- combinations that are associated with profitability?

Author

Listed:
  • Subelack, Jonas

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate whether specific treatments or combinations of treatments are significantly associated with the profitability of Swiss acute-care hospitals under the current diagnosis-related group (S-DRG) reimbursement system, while accounting for differences between public and private institutions. Methods: A comprehensive panel dataset of 142 Swiss acute-care hospitals, spanning from 2015 to 2022, was utilized, combining detailed financial and clinical case-level data. Profitability was assessed through hospital-level net financial results excluding deficit-covering payments. All cases were assigned uniquely to a medically homogeneous service group or area, as determined by Swiss hospital capacity planning. Fixed-effects panel regression models analyzed the associations between service areas and profitability, while an Apriori association rule mining algorithm identified service group combinations associated with profitability. Results: From 2015 to 2022, overall hospital profitability margins declined continuously, with public hospitals consistently reporting lower profitability than private hospitals (net profitability margin: 0.75% vs. 1.61%), despite receiving substantial subsidies (CHF 67.1 million vs. CHF 4.1 million). The primary panel regression revealed that three service areas are significantly associated with hospital profitability: Ear, nose and throat (16,778 CHF; p﹤0.05), gynecology (27,456 CHF; p﹤0.01), and heart (10,725 CHF; p﹤0.01). The Apriori algorithm identified that the combination of the following service groups is most strongly linked to profitability: AUG1.2 (orbit, eyelids, tear ducts), BEW10 (plexus surgery), and GEF2 (interventional and endovascular vascular medicine; support: 0.051, confidence: 0.935, lift: 1.615). Conclusion: The analysis of hospital profitability based on the treatments and combinations of treatments performed indicates that the S-DRG reimbursement system is relatively fair. However, across all analyses, the heart service area is primarily associated with profitability, while the serious injury service area is mainly associated with losses. Therefore, minor adjustments to the S-DRG cost weights should be made to reduce this imbalance.

Suggested Citation

  • Subelack, Jonas, 2025. "Swiss hospital financing with DRGs: Are there treatments/- combinations that are associated with profitability?," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2025-02, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/318261/1/wps-2025-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Hospital financing; hospital profitability; hospital reimbursement; DRG; Switzerland;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://med.unisg.ch/de/forschung/management-im-gesundheitswesen .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.