IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/hsgmed/202502.html

Swiss hospital financing with DRGs: Are there treatments/- combinations that are associated with profitability?

Author

Listed:
  • Subelack, Jonas

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to investigate whether specific treatments or combinations of treatments are significantly associated with the profitability of Swiss acute-care hospitals under the current diagnosis-related group (S-DRG) reimbursement system, while accounting for differences between public and private institutions. Methods: A comprehensive panel dataset of 142 Swiss acute-care hospitals, spanning from 2015 to 2022, was utilized, combining detailed financial and clinical case-level data. Profitability was assessed through hospital-level net financial results excluding deficit-covering payments. All cases were assigned uniquely to a medically homogeneous service group or area, as determined by Swiss hospital capacity planning. Fixed-effects panel regression models analyzed the associations between service areas and profitability, while an Apriori association rule mining algorithm identified service group combinations associated with profitability. Results: From 2015 to 2022, overall hospital profitability margins declined continuously, with public hospitals consistently reporting lower profitability than private hospitals (net profitability margin: 0.75% vs. 1.61%), despite receiving substantial subsidies (CHF 67.1 million vs. CHF 4.1 million). The primary panel regression revealed that three service areas are significantly associated with hospital profitability: Ear, nose and throat (16,778 CHF; p﹤0.05), gynecology (27,456 CHF; p﹤0.01), and heart (10,725 CHF; p﹤0.01). The Apriori algorithm identified that the combination of the following service groups is most strongly linked to profitability: AUG1.2 (orbit, eyelids, tear ducts), BEW10 (plexus surgery), and GEF2 (interventional and endovascular vascular medicine; support: 0.051, confidence: 0.935, lift: 1.615). Conclusion: The analysis of hospital profitability based on the treatments and combinations of treatments performed indicates that the S-DRG reimbursement system is relatively fair. However, across all analyses, the heart service area is primarily associated with profitability, while the serious injury service area is mainly associated with losses. Therefore, minor adjustments to the S-DRG cost weights should be made to reduce this imbalance.

Suggested Citation

  • Subelack, Jonas, 2025. "Swiss hospital financing with DRGs: Are there treatments/- combinations that are associated with profitability?," Working Paper Series in Health Economics, Management and Policy 2025-02, University of St.Gallen, School of Medicine, Chair of Health Economics, Policy and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/318261/1/wps-2025-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James H. Stock & Mark W. Watson, 2008. "Heteroskedasticity-Robust Standard Errors for Fixed Effects Panel Data Regression," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 76(1), pages 155-174, January.
    2. Widmer, Philippe K., 2016. "SwissDRG: Ein Vergütungssystem mit ungleichen finanziellen Risiken für die Spitäler?," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 70(3), pages 210-226.
    3. Alice Giese & Rasheda Khanam & Son Nghiem & Thomas Rosemann & Michael M. Havranek, 2024. "Patient-reported experience is associated with higher future revenue and lower costs of hospitals," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 25(6), pages 1031-1039, August.
    4. Boes, Stefan & Napierala, Christoph, 2021. "Assessment of the introduction of DRG-based reimbursement in Switzerland: Evidence on the short-term effects on length of stay compliance in university hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(6), pages 739-750.
    5. Michael M Havranek & Josef Ondrej & Stella Bollmann & Philippe K Widmer & Simon Spika & Stefan Boes, 2022. "Identification and assessment of a comprehensive set of structural factors associated with hospital costs in Switzerland," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Tarun Mehra & Christian Thomas Benedikt Müller & Jörk Volbracht & Burkhardt Seifert & Rudolf Moos, 2015. "Predictors of High Profit and High Deficit Outliers under SwissDRG of a Tertiary Care Center," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elena Vakulenko, 2019. "Motives for internal migration in Russia: what has changed in recent years?," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 55, pages 113-138.
    2. Reischmann, Markus, 2016. "Creative accounting and electoral motives: Evidence from OECD countries," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 243-257.
    3. Karlsson, Martin & Nilsson, Therese & Pichler, Stefan, 2014. "The impact of the 1918 Spanish flu epidemic on economic performance in Sweden," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-19.
    4. Ming, Yaxin & Deng, Huixin & Wu, Xiaoyue, 2022. "The negative effect of air pollution on people's pro-environmental behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 72-87.
    5. Riccardo D'Adamo, 2018. "Cluster-Robust Standard Errors for Linear Regression Models with Many Controls," Papers 1806.07314, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    6. Koen Jochmans, 2020. "Testing for correlation in error‐component models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(7), pages 860-878, November.
    7. Justina A. V. Fischer & Alfonso Sousa‐Poza, 2009. "Does job satisfaction improve the health of workers? New evidence using panel data and objective measures of health," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(1), pages 71-89, January.
    8. Aaron Michael Shew & Alvaro Durand‐Morat & Lawton Lanier Nalley & Karen Ann‐Kuenzel Moldenhauer, 2018. "Estimating the benefits of public plant breeding: beyond profits," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 753-764, November.
    9. Will Chancellor, 2023. "Exploring the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and productivity: Evidence from Australian farms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 67(2), pages 285-302, April.
    10. Octavio Fernández-Amador & Joseph F. Francois & Doris A. Oberdabernig & Patrick Tomberger, 2020. "Economic growth, sectoral structures, and environmental methane footprints," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(13), pages 1460-1475, March.
    11. Elisa Barbieri & Manli Huang & Shenglei Pi & Mattia Tassinari, 2017. "Restructuring the Production of Medicines: An Investigation on the Pharmaceutical Sector in China and the Role of Mergers and Acquisitions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, October.
    12. Christopher S. Sutherland, 2020. "Forward Guidance and Expectation Formation: A Narrative Approach," Staff Working Papers 20-40, Bank of Canada.
    13. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Gröschl, Jasmin, 2013. "Natural disasters and the effect of trade on income: A new panel IV approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 18-30.
    14. Kirill Borusyak & Xavier Jaravel & Jann Spiess, 2024. "Revisiting Event-Study Designs: Robust and Efficient Estimation," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(6), pages 3253-3285.
    15. Amiri, Hossein & Samadian, Farzaneh & Yahoo, Masoud & Jamali, Seyed Jafar, 2019. "Natural resource abundance, institutional quality and manufacturing development: Evidence from resource-rich countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 550-560.
    16. Carlos Alberto Tovar Jaco & Madeleyne Karol Mucha Alhuay & Pedro Bernabe Venegas Rodriguez & Nivardo Alonzo Santill¨¢n Zapata & Jimmy Alberth Deza Quispe, 2021. "Analysis of Macroeconomic Determinants of Peruvian Gold Export Value in the Period 2003-2019," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 12(2), pages 43-54, April.
    17. Jerry A. Hausman & Maxim L. Pinkovskiy, 2017. "Estimating dynamic panel models: backing out the Nickell Bias," Staff Reports 824, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    18. Carlos Lamarche, 2013. "Industry-wide work rules and productivity: evidence from Argentine union contract data," IZA Journal of Labor & Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 2(1), pages 1-25, December.
    19. Peterson K. Ozili & Paul Terhemba Iorember, 2024. "Financial stability and sustainable development," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(3), pages 2620-2646, July.
    20. Álvarez, Inmaculada C. & Barbero, Javier & Zofío, José L., 2017. "A Panel Data Toolbox for MATLAB," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 76(i06).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H51 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Government Expenditures and Health
    • I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets
    • I15 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Health and Economic Development
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health
    • L51 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy - - - Economics of Regulation

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:hsgmed:202502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://med.unisg.ch/de/forschung/management-im-gesundheitswesen .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.