IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/war/wpaper/2013-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Welfare Analysis of a Prohibitive NTM in a Society with a Proportion of Concerned Consumers

Author

Listed:
  • M. Mahdi Ghodsi

    () (Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw; Department of Economic Sciences of Catholic University of Milan)

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to provide a cost-benefit analysis in a partial equilibrium framework to investigate the welfare consequences of a non-tariff measure (NTM). The important issue of the analysis is having two groups of indifferent and concerned consumers. The ultimate aim of the paper is to investigate whether or not the paternalistic behavior of government is in line with the willingness of the consumers for demand. The existence of information about the origin of goods is the leading issue of the analysis that provides two different scenarios. The model is calibrated with data on consumption of shrimps. The findings suggest that in the existence of such information, NTM policy has the lowest international losses and highest domestic gains. The policy implication of these results suggests that governments should try to increase the information in the market when they are following good faith for imposition of NTM.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Mahdi Ghodsi, 2013. "Welfare Analysis of a Prohibitive NTM in a Society with a Proportion of Concerned Consumers," Working Papers 2013-12, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
  • Handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2013-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.wne.uw.edu.pl/inf/wyd/WP/WNE_WP97.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:wsi:wschap:9789813144415_0007 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Philip L. Paarlberg & John G. Lee, 1998. "Import Restrictions in the Presence of a Health Risk: An Illustration Using FMD," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(1), pages 175-183.
    3. Frank van Tongeren & John Beghin & Stéphane Marette, 2009. "A Cost-Benefit Framework for the Assessment of Non-Tariff Measures in Agro-Food Trade," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 21, OECD Publishing.
    4. John Beghin & Anne-Célia Disdier & Stéphan Marette & Frank Van Tongeren, 2017. "Welfare costs and benefits of non-tariff measures in trade: a conceptual framework and application," World Scientific Book Chapters,in: Nontariff Measures and International Trade, chapter 7, pages 119-138 World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Emma Aisbett & Lee M. Pearson, 2012. "Environmental and Health Protections, or New Protectionism? Determinants of SPS Notifications by WTO Members," Crawford School Research Papers 1213, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.
    6. Maskus, Keith E. & Wilson, John S. & Tsunehiro Otsuki, 2000. "Quantifying the impact of technical barriers to trade : a framework for analysis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2512, The World Bank.
    7. Mohammad Mahdi Ghodsi, 2012. "Corruption and the Level of Trade Protectionism," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 30.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    welfare; trade policy; non-tariff measures; technical barriers to trade;

    JEL classification:

    • D61 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Allocative Efficiency; Cost-Benefit Analysis
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:war:wpaper:2013-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marcin Bąba). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/fesuwpl.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.