Price discrimination with costly consumer arbitrage
Consumer arbitrage affects discriminatory pricing across markets in several ways. If all consumers face the same arbitrage costs, a monopolist's profit increases with arbitrage costs, and overall welfare declines with them (if output does not rise). If arbitrage costs differ across consumers, a monopolist may sell in a second market even if there is no local demand - it can use the second market to discriminate across consumers in the first market on the basis of their costs. When there is also local demand in the second market, welfare may be increasing in arbitrage costs, even if output falls.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
|Date of creation:||1999|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in: Review of International Economics (1999) v.7,p.126-139|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: CP135, 50, avenue F.D. Roosevelt, 1050 Bruxelles|
Web page: http://difusion.ulb.ac.be
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/1699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.