An introduction to the use of randomized control trials to evaluate development interventions
RCTs have become popular in the development community as part of the response to the results agenda. These studies are well placed to address the question of which programmes work or not. And, properly designed, they can be embedded in a broader evaluation design which also addresses questions of why an intervention works in a specific context or not, and at what cost. Usually the appropriate design will not be a simple randomization drawn from an eligible list. So there are several decisions to be made in designing a RCT, and these decisions should be recorded in a study protocol which is placed in the public domain before the study begins. Many of the criticisms of RCTs can be responded to. But some require more reflection and research and have implications for the conduct of RCTs.
|Date of creation:||01 Feb 2011|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Global Development Network, Post Box No. 7510, Vasant Kunj P.O., New Delhi|
Web page: http://www.3ieimpact.org/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Anju Vajja & Howard White, 2008. "Can the World Bank Build Social Capital? The Experience of Social Funds in Malawi and Zambia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1145-1168.
- White, Howard, 2009. "Theory-Based Impact Evaluation," 3ie Publications 2009-3, International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:iiierp:2011_009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Rajesh Sharma)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.