Author
Listed:
- Justin Quinton
(Department of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada)
- Glenn P. Jenkins
(Department of Economics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and Cambridge Resources International Inc.)
- Godwin Olasehinde-Williams
(Department of Management Information Systems, Istanbul Ticaret University, Turkey)
Abstract
This study investigates the dynamics of household food insecurity in Nigeria using panel data from three waves (2012, 2015, and 2018) of the General Household Survey, situating micro-level evidence within the broader macroeconomic context. This survey is a nationally representative sample of approximately 5000 households that have been surveyed six times across the three waves. We document that the sharp deterioration in food security after 2015 coincided with three major national developments: a steep naira depreciation, a 57.3% increase in the food consumer price index, and a collapse in real food imports from $11.34 billion in 2012 to $4.21 billion in 2018, largely shaped by the 2015 oil price collapse and foreign exchange restrictions on food imports. These indicators highlight a macro-monetary transmission channel through which the oil price collapse and subsequent policy responses amplified retail food price pressures, raising household vulnerability. To identify the distributional impact of these shocks, we employ a difference-in-differences design that exploits the differential exposure of urban versus rural households. Urban households, more reliant on monetized and import-exposed food markets, serve as the treatment group, while rural households, with partial self-provisioning capacity, act as the control. Results reveal a significant post-shock rise in food insecurity across all households, with an additional and statistically robust increase among urban households. These findings clarify the mechanism by which macroeconomic and trade shocks transmit through urban retail markets to household welfare, underscoring the importance of targeted policy responses. By linking national price and trade disruptions directly to household outcomes, the paper offers a concrete evidence-based framework to guide interventions aimed at mitigating the welfare costs of macroeconomic shocks.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- D10 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - General
- E2 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment
- Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:qed:dpaper:4643. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Babcock (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.