Poaching, Courts, and Settlements:Complementarity of Governance in Labor Markets
Transition between private governance mechanism and the state court is not necessarily unidirectional. This research assumes that non-monotonic changes in governance mechanism comes from complementarity between the private and public mechanisms when neither of both is sufficiently efficient. Then it studies transition of governance in the labor market of Japanese silk-reeling industry from the 1890s to the 1920s, which rapidly grew then and often showed poaching, and ascertains that employers first had recourse to the court for enforcement of employment contract, they second built private mechanisms for settlement backed by the court, and third abandoned the private mechanism.
|Date of creation:||01 Jun 2009|
|Date of revision:||21 Jan 2014|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: (03)3812-2111 ext 4904
Web page: http://www.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publishments/dpf/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Lagerlöf, Nils-Petter, 2003. "Slavery and other property rights," MPRA Paper 372, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 30 Aug 2006.
- Booth, Alison L & Frank, Jeff, 1997.
CEPR Discussion Papers
1593, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:itk:issdps:f145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.