From the Substance to the Shadow: The Court Embedded into Japanese Labor Markets
Modern contract law generally does not allow property rights or similar claims to be made against employees. This undermines a claim on the return on the employer fs investments in recruiting and training a worker, making them vulnerable to possible infringement from a bystander. Accordingly, employers investment in recruiting and training might become deficient. Therefore, protecting an employer fs investment, balanced against the mobility of the labor market for better employer-employee matches, has emerged as an issue in the transitory phase towards a market-based economy. We explore how the Japanese state court in its early period addressed this issue in the tight labor market of the silk-reeling industry, the leading industry then. The court first directly protected interests of employers whose employees were poached, at the expense of workers mobility. Then, it seemed to indirectly govern transactions between employers as a shadow off-the-equilibrium path. Thus, an employer whose employee was poached and an employer who dud the poaching would privately negotiate to settle the dispute, using a possible suit as a threat against the poacher. Examining suits that were actually filed leads to this hypothesis. This indirect governance facilitated labor market mobility with some protection of the original employer fs claim.
|Date of creation:||24 Feb 2014|
|Date of revision:||28 Mar 2014|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113|
Phone: (03)3812-2111 ext 4904
Web page: http://www.iss.u-tokyo.ac.jp/publishments/dpf/
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Tom Ginsburg & Glenn Hoetker, 2006. "The Unreluctant Litigant? An Empirical Analysis of Japanâ€™s Turn to Litigation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(1), pages 31-59, 01.
- Galenson, David W, 1981.
"The Market Evaluation of Human Capital: The Case of Indentured Servitude,"
Journal of Political Economy,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 89(3), pages 446-467, June.
- Galenson, David W., "undated". "The Market Evaluation of Human Capital: The Case of Indentured Servitude," Working Papers 316, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
- Grubb, Farley, 1985. "The Market for Indentured Immigrants: Evidence on the Efficiency of Forward-Labor Contracting in Philadelphia, 1745–1773," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(04), pages 855-868, December.
- Albert Choi & George Triantis, 2008. "Completing Contracts in the Shadow of Costly Verification," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(2), pages 503-534, 06.
- Suresh Naidu, 2010. "Recruitment Restrictions and Labor Markets: Evidence from the Postbellum U.S. South," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(2), pages 413-445, April.
- Booth, Alison L & Frank, Jeff, 1999. "Earnings, Productivity, and Performance-Related Pay," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(3), pages 447-463, July.
- Hicks, J. R., 1969. "A Theory of Economic History," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198811633.
- Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2006. "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 121(1), pages 267-288.
- Stevenson, Betsey & Wolfers, Justin, 2003. "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress," Research Papers 1828, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
- Betsey Stevenson & Justin Wolfers, 2003. "Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: Divorce Laws and Family Distress," NBER Working Papers 10175, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:itk:issdps:f168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.