IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ind/icrier/248.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

OTC Derivatives Market in India: Recent Regulatory Initiatives and Open Issues for Market Stability and Development

Author

Listed:
  • Dayanand Arora

    (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Rela)

  • Francis Xavier Rathinam

    (Indian Council for Research on International Economic Rela)

Abstract

The OTC derivatives markets all over the world have shown tremendous growth inrecent years. In the wake of the present financial crisis, which is believed to have beenexacerbated by OTC derivatives, increasing attention is being paid to analysing theregulatory environment of these markets. In this context, we analyse the regulatoryframework of the OTC derivatives market in India. The paper, inter alia, seeks toprove the point that the Indian OTC derivatives markets, unlike many otherjurisdictions, are well regulated. Only contracts where one party to the contract is anRBI regulated entity are considered legally valid in India. A good reporting systemand a post-trade clearing and settlement system, through a centralised counter party,has ensured good surveillance of the systemic risks in the Indian OTC market.From amongst the various OTC derivatives markets permitted in India, interest rateswaps and foreign currency forwards are the two prominent markets. However, byinternational standards, the total size of the Indian OTC derivatives markets stillremains small because credit default swaps were conspicuously absent in India untilnow. It appears that Indian OTC derivatives markets will grow fast once again afterthe present financial crisis is over. This research paper explores those open issues thatare important to ensure market stability and development. On the issue of the muchdiscussed competition between exchange-traded and OTC-traded derivatives, webelieve that the two markets serve different purposes and would contribute more torisk management and market efficiency, if viewed as complementary. Regarding theintroduction of new derivative products for credit risk transfer, the recentannouncement by the RBI that it would introduce credit default swaps is a welcomesign. We believe that routing of credit default swaps through a reporting platform andmanaging its post-trade activities through a centralised counterparty would providebetter surveillance of the market. Strengthening the position of the ClearingCorporation of India Ltd. (CCIL) as the only centralised counterparty for Indian OTCderivatives market and better supervision of the off-balance sheet business offinancial institutions are two measures that have been proposed to ensure the stabilityof the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Dayanand Arora & Francis Xavier Rathinam, "undated". "OTC Derivatives Market in India: Recent Regulatory Initiatives and Open Issues for Market Stability and Development," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 248, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    • Handle: RePEc:ind:icrier:248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.icrier.org/pdf/WORKING%20PAPER%20248.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allen, Franklin & Carletti, Elena, 2006. "Credit risk transfer and contagion," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 89-111, January.
    2. Stephen G Cecchetti & Jacob Gyntelberg & Marc Hollanders, 2009. "Central counterparties for over-the-counter derivatives," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, September.
    3. S. Narayan, 2009. "India," Chapters, in: Peter Draper & Philip Alves & Razeen Sally (ed.), The Political Economy of Trade Reform in Emerging Markets, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dayanand Arora & Francis Xavier Rathinam, 2011. "OTC derivatives market in India: recent regulatory initiatives and open issues for market stability and development," Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 235-261, April.
    2. Jaremski, Matthew, 2018. "The (dis)advantages of clearinghouses before the Fed," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(3), pages 435-458.
    3. Azoumah, Y. & Yamegueu, D. & Ginies, P. & Coulibaly, Y. & Girard, P., 2011. "Sustainable electricity generation for rural and peri-urban populations of sub-Saharan Africa: The "flexy-energy" concept," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 131-141, January.
    4. Findlater, K.M. & Kandlikar, M., 2011. "Land use and second-generation biofuel feedstocks: The unconsidered impacts of Jatropha biodiesel in Rajasthan, India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3404-3413, June.
    5. Tongurai, Jittima & Vithessonthi, Chaiporn, 2018. "The impact of the banking sector on economic structure and growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 193-207.
    6. Nicole Boyson & Jean Helwege & Jan Jindra, 2014. "Crises, Liquidity Shocks, and Fire Sales at Commercial Banks," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(4), pages 857-884, December.
    7. Massimiliano Affinito & Matteo Piazza, 2021. "Always Look on the Bright Side? Central Counterparties and Interbank Markets during the Financial Crisis," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 17(1), pages 231-283, March.
    8. Elizabeth Kaletski & Nishith Prakash, 2017. "Can Elected Minority Representatives Affect Health Worker Visits? Evidence from India," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(1), pages 67-102, February.
    9. Elena Carletti & Agnese Leonello, 2019. "Credit Market Competition and Liquidity Crises," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 23(5), pages 855-892.
    10. Mitrut, Andreea & Wolff, François-Charles, 2011. "The impact of legalized abortion on child health outcomes and abandonment. Evidence from Romania," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 1219-1231.
    11. Oehmke, Martin & Zawadowski, Adam, 2015. "Synthetic or real? The equilibrium effects of credit default swaps on bond markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84511, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Kim, Teakdong & Koo, Bonwoo & Park, Minsoo, 2013. "Role of financial regulation and innovation in the financial crisis," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 662-672.
    13. Maarten van Oordt, 2017. "Credit Risk Transfer and Bank Insolvency Risk," Staff Working Papers 17-59, Bank of Canada.
    14. Mattoo, Aaditya & Subramanian, Arvind, 2012. "Equity in Climate Change: An Analytical Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1083-1097.
    15. Varun & Prakash, Ravi & Bhat, I.K., 2010. "A figure of merit for evaluating sustainability of renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1640-1643, August.
    16. Allen, Franklin & Gu, Xian, 2018. "The Interplay between Regulations and Financial Stability," CEPR Discussion Papers 12862, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    17. Nicolò, Antonio & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2008. "Credit derivatives, capital requirements and opaque OTC markets," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 444-463, October.
    18. Asaf Bernstein & Eric Hughson & Marc D. Weidenmier, 2014. "Counterparty Risk and the Establishment of the New York Stock Exchange Clearinghouse," NBER Working Papers 20459, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Neuner, Stefan & Schäfer, Klaus, 2011. "Zentrale Gegenparteien für den außerbörslichen Derivatehandel in der Praxis," Bayreuth Working Papers on Finance, Accounting and Taxation (FAcT-Papers) 2011-02, University of Bayreuth, Chair of Finance and Banking.
    20. Eiji Yamamura, 2012. "Groups and information disclosure: evidence on the Olson and Putnam hypotheses in Japan," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(6), pages 423-439, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Derivatives and Over the Counter Market; Financial Institutions and Services and Government Policy and Financial Regulation;

    JEL classification:

    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ind:icrier:248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: G.K. Manjunath/A. Reddy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/icriein.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.