IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iim/iimawp/10681.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

India’s Agricultural Development under the New Economic Regime: Policy Perspective and Strategy for the 12th Five Year Plan

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Vijay Paul

Abstract

During the last two decades Indian agriculture has been facing major challenges like deceleration in growth rate, inter-sectoral and inter-regional equity, declining input efficiency, degradation of natural resources, etc. with consequent adverse effects on food and nutritional security, food inflation and poverty reduction. However, the 11th Plan had some success in reversing the deceleration of agricultural growth witnessed during the 9th and 10th Plan but food inflation still remains a major concern. The growth in agriculture in the 11th Plan is likely to be around 3.2 percent per year, which is higher than 10th Plan growth rate but lower than the target (4.0%) for 11th Plan. The 12th Plan growth target for agriculture sector has been set at 4 percent with foodgrains growth at about 2 percent and non-foodgrains sector (horticulture, livestock and fisheries) growing at about 5-6 percent. However, looking at the growth in agriculture sector in general and high-value agriculture, particularly, horticulture, fisheries, dairy and meat sector during the 11th Plan, there is a need to put additional efforts to achieve 4 percent growth in agriculture. The failure to achieve targeted growth in agriculture has resulted from the inadequacies of the provision of the critical public goods such as research and development, extension services, surface irrigation, rural infrastructure, etc. on which agricultural growth thrives as well as inappropriate policies. In order to achieve the targeted growth in 12th Plan, we need to address some of these inadequacies. The sector would require substantial increase in investment both by public and private sector in agriculture research and development including extension, rural infrastructure, post-harvest and market infrastructure including storage and processing, reforms in laws related to land markets and marketing of agricultural products, and appropriate price policy. The pricing of agricultural inputs such as irrigation, electricity for pumping water, fertilizer, etc. needs rationalization. The distributional aspects of agricultural credit including inter-regional and inter-class inequalities in access to credit, decline in rural branches, declining share of direct credit, etc. must be addressed. People’s participation, which will help in promoting the bottom up approach of planning process and also help in faster diffusion of the technologies and best practices among farmers, community based actions and participation of disadvantaged sections of the society in developmental process, needs to be strengthened.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Vijay Paul, 2011. "India’s Agricultural Development under the New Economic Regime: Policy Perspective and Strategy for the 12th Five Year Plan," IIMA Working Papers WP2011-11-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
  • Handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:10681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.iima.ac.in/sites/default/files/rnpfiles/16179126012011-11-01.pdf
    File Function: English Version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bardhan, Pranab K, 1973. "Size, Productivity, and Returns to Scale: An Analysis of Farm-Level Data in Indian Agriculture," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(6), pages 1370-1386, Nov.-Dec..
    2. Planning Commission, India, 2011. "Faster, Sustainable and More Inclusive Growth: An Approach to the 12th Five Year Plan," Working Papers id:4452, eSocialSciences.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shalendra & Gummagolmath, K.C. & Sharma, Purushottam, 2013. "User Centric ICT Model for Supply Chain of Horticultural Crops in India," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 26(1), June.
    2. Rekha Misra & Pallavi Chavan & Radheshyam Verma, 2016. "Agricultural Credit in India in the 2000s: Growth, Distribution and Linkages with Productivity," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 10(2), pages 169-197, May.
    3. Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Luthra, Sunil & Rich, Nick & Kumar, Divesh & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2018. "Enablers to implement sustainable initiatives in agri-food supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 379-393.
    4. Pattnaik, Itishree & Shah, Amita, 2015. "Trends and Decomposition of Agricultural Growth and Crop Output in Gujarat: Recent Evidence," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(2), pages 1-16.
    5. Sacchidananda Mukherjee & Debashis Chakraborty, 2017. "Can Economic Development Influence General Election Outcomes? Evidence from Consumption Expenditure Trends of Indian States," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 2(2), pages 131-150, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilligan, Daniel O., 1998. "Farm Size, Productivity, And Economic Efficiency: Accounting For Differences In Efficiency Of Farms By Size In Honduras," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Mochebelele, Motsamai T. & Winter-Nelson, Alex, 2000. "Migrant Labor and Farm Technical Efficiency in Lesotho," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 143-153, January.
    3. Klaus Deininger & Denys Nizalov & Sudhir K Singh, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture? Exploring the farm size-productivity relationship for large commercial farms in Ukraine," Discussion Papers 49, Kyiv School of Economics.
    4. Aragón, Fernando M. & Restuccia, Diego & Rud, Juan Pablo, 2022. "Are small farms really more productive than large farms?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Susanna M Makela & Rakhi Dandona & T R Dilip & Lalit Dandona, 2013. "Social Sector Expenditure and Child Mortality in India: A State-Level Analysis from 1997 to 2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(2), pages 1-10, February.
    6. Bharadwaj, Prashant, 2015. "Fertility and rural labor market inefficiencies: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 217-232.
    7. Coelli, Tim J. & Battese, George E., 1996. "Identification Of Factors Which Influence The Technical Inefficiency Of Indian Farmers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 40(2), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Klaus Deininger & Songqing Jin & Yanyan Liu & Sudhir K. Singh, 2018. "Can Labor-Market Imperfections Explain Changes in the Inverse Farm Size–Productivity Relationship? Longitudinal Evidence from Rural India," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 94(2), pages 239-258.
    9. Thomas, Mini P, 2019. "Measurement of Investment Contribution of Service Sector in India’s Economic Growth," MPRA Paper 103702, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Mitra, Arup & Sharma, Chandan & Véganzonès-Varoudakis, Marie-Ange, 2014. "Trade liberalization, technology transfer, and firms’ productive performance: The case of Indian manufacturing," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 1-15.
    11. Klasen, Stephan & Reimers, Malte, 2017. "Looking at Pro-Poor Growth from an Agricultural Perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 147-168.
    12. Thottappilly, Anna, 2021. "Identifying the Income Effect on Nutrition for Agricultural Households: Separability of Production and Consumption," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315335, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Kaliappa Kalirajan,, 2012. "Regional Cooperation towards Green Asia : Trade and Investment," Development Economics Working Papers 23291, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. Barrett, Christopher B., 1996. "On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 193-215, December.
    15. Tandel, Vaidehi & Hiranandani, Komal & Kapoor, Mudit, 2019. "What’s in a definition? A study on the suitability of the current urban definition in India through its employment guarantee programme," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 69-84.
    16. Fang Xia & Lingling Hou & Songqing Jin & Dongqing Li, 2020. "Land size and productivity in the livestock sector: evidence from pastoral areas in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 867-888, July.
    17. Mensah, Edouard R. & Kostandini, Genti, 2020. "The inverse farm size-productivity relationship under land size mis-measurement and in the presence of weather and price risks: Panel data evidence from Uganda," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304477, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Akram-Lodhi, A.H., 2001. "Vietnam's agriculture: is there an inverse relationship?," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19096, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    19. Coronese, Matteo & Occelli, Martina & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "AgriLOVE: Agriculture, land-use and technical change in an evolutionary, agent-based model," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    20. Thapa, Sridhar, 2007. "The relationship between farm size and productivity: empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills," 106th Seminar, October 25-27, 2007, Montpellier, France 7940, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iim:iimawp:10681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eciimin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.