IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ias/mpaper/07-mwp10.html

Recent International and Regulatory Decisions about Geographical Indications, The

Author

Listed:
  • Stéphan Marette
  • Roxanne Clemens
  • Bruce A. Babcock

Abstract

As worldwide consumer demand for high-quality products and for information about these products increases, labels and geographical indications (GIs) can serve to signal quality traits to consumers. However, GI systems among countries are not homogeneous and can be used as trade barriers against competition. Philosophical differences between the European Union and the United States about how GIs should be registered and protected led to the formation of a WTO dispute settlement panel. In this paper we discuss the issues behind the dispute, the World Trade Organization (WTO) panel decision, and the EU response to the panel decision leading to the new Regulation 510/2006. Given the potential for GI labels to supply consumer information, context is provided for the discussion using recent literature on product labeling. Implications are drawn regarding the importance of the panel decision and the EU response relative to GI issues yet to be negotiated under the Doha Round.

Suggested Citation

  • Stéphan Marette & Roxanne Clemens & Bruce A. Babcock, 2007. "Recent International and Regulatory Decisions about Geographical Indications, The," Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC) Publications (archive only) 07-mwp10, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    • Handle: RePEc:ias:mpaper:07-mwp10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/pdf/07mwp10.pdf
    File Function: Full Text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=1034
    File Function: Online Synopsis
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koen Deconinck & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "The Political Economy of Geographical Indications," LICOS Discussion Papers 35814, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven.
    2. Patel, Payal & House, Lisa & Spreen, Thomas H., 2011. "How Do Different Countries Use Labeling Standards: A Case Study Comparing Wisconsin Real Cheese to Parmigiano-Reggiano," 2011 International European Forum, February 14-18, 2011, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 122015, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    3. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    4. Catherine Haeck & Giulia Meloni & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "The Value of Terroir: A Historical Analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne Geographical Indications," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 598-619, December.
    5. Marette, Stephan, 2009. "Can Foreign Producers Benefit from Geographical Indications under the New European Regulation?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(01), pages 1-12.
    6. repec:ken:wpaper:0802 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Rousu Matthew C. & Corrigan Jay R., 2008. "Estimating the Welfare Loss to Consumers When Food Labels Do Not Adequately Inform: An Application to Fair Trade Certification," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-26, May.
    8. Le Goffic, Caroline & Zappalaglio, Andrea, 2017. "The Role Played by the US Government in Protecting Geographical Indications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 35-44.
    9. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    10. Anders, Sven M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2009. "The Benefits and Costs of Proliferation of Geographical Labeling for Developing Countries," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(01), pages 1-17.
    11. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, 2012. "Group heterogeneity and cooperation on the geographical indication regulation: The case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 207-216.
    12. Koen Deconinck & Jo Swinnen, 2021. "The Size of Terroir: A Theoretical Note on Economics and Politics of Geographical Indications," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 321-328, February.
    13. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Maria Rosaria Pupo d'Andrea & Jo Swinnen & Giulia Meloni & Senne Vandevelde & Alessandro Olper & Daniele Curzi & Valentina Raimondi & Sophie Drogue, 2018. "Research for AGRI Committee - Agricultural trade: assessing reciprocity of standards," Working Papers hal-02787948, HAL.
    14. Fares, M’hand & Raza, Saqlain & Thomas, Alban, 2018. "Is there complementarity between labels and brands? Evidence from small French co-operatives," TSE Working Papers 18-895, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    15. Lim, Kar Ho & Hu, Wuyang & Maynard, Leigh J. & Goddard, Ellen W., "undated". "Willingness to Pay for Imported Beef and Risk Perception: An application of Individual-Level Parameter," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119755, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Jay Corrigan & Matthew Rousu, 2008. "Estimating the value consumers derive from product labeling," Framed Field Experiments 00192, The Field Experiments Website.
    17. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    18. Cristina Vaquero Piñeiro & Daniele Curzi, 2024. "Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 653-671, June.
    19. Giulia Meloni & Kym Anderson & Koen Deconinck & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "Wine Regulations," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 41(4), pages 620-649, December.
    20. Jianyu Yu & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Production standards, competition and vertical relationship," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 79-111.
    21. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans & Oliver Ken Haase, 2024. "Potable intellectual property: WTO TRIPS and EU geographical indication wines," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 1065-1082, September.
    22. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, "undated". "Heterogeneity of Members’ Characteristics and Cooperation within Producer Groups Regulating Geographical Indications: The Case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95203, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    23. M’hand Fares & Saqlain Raza & Alban Thomas, 2018. "Is There Complementarity Between Certified Labels and Brands? Evidence from Small French Cooperatives," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(2), pages 367-395, September.
    24. House, Lisa & Patel, Payal & Thomas, Spreen, 2009. "How do Different Countries use PDO/GI Standards: A Case Study Comparing Wisconsin Cheddar to Parmesan-Reggiano," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59176, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    25. Alexander E. Saak, 2011. "A Model of Labeling with Horizontal Differentiation and Cost Variability," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 93(4), pages 1131-1150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • F1 - International Economics - - Trade
    • Q1 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ias:mpaper:07-mwp10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/maiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.