IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi09/59176.html

How do Different Countries use PDO/GI Standards: A Case Study Comparing Wisconsin Cheddar to Parmesan-Reggiano

Author

Listed:
  • House, Lisa
  • Patel, Payal
  • Thomas, Spreen

Abstract

Protected Geographic Indicators (PGI) and Product Differentiation of Origination (PDO) are products that are linked to certain regions or countries that define them based on where they are produced, prepared and/or packaged before they are sold. However, the exact interpretation of PGI/PDOs is not synonymous around the world, leading to disputes over trade barriers between nations. The goal of this paper is to discuss the quality and safety control issues that go into the production of PGI/PDOs as well as trade regulations that are currently being discussed at the World Trade Organization’s Doha multilateral trade agreements meetings. A comparison of how countries mark PGI/PDO products is made by comparing two cheese industries: Wisconsin Cheddar from the United States and Parmigiano Reggiano from Italy. In theory, the World Trade Organization has a product labeling agreement that was created in 1979 under the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. However, as is most common, problems arise when countries begin to use their own forms of labeling, therefore resulting in barriers of trade between countries (WTO). Due to diverse thought among producers in different countries, there are often incentives that lead to different product labeling.

Suggested Citation

  • House, Lisa & Patel, Payal & Thomas, Spreen, 2009. "How do Different Countries use PDO/GI Standards: A Case Study Comparing Wisconsin Cheddar to Parmesan-Reggiano," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59176, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59176
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.59176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/59176/files/House-Patel.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.59176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephan Marette & Roxanne Clemens & Bruce Babcock, 2008. "Recent international and regulatory decisions about geographical indications," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 453-472.
    2. Bruce A. Babcock & Roxanne Clemens, 2004. "Geographical Indications and Property Rights: Protecting Value-Added Agricultural Products," Midwest Agribusiness Trade Research and Information Center (MATRIC) Publications (archive only) 04-mbp7, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haas, Rainer & Sterns, James & Meixner, Oliver, 2013. "US Consumers’ Perception of Local and Organic Food: An Analysis Based on Means-End Chain Analysis and Word Association," 2013 International European Forum, February 18-22, 2013, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 164759, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, 2012. "Group heterogeneity and cooperation on the geographical indication regulation: The case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 207-216.
    2. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    3. Patel, Payal & House, Lisa & Spreen, Thomas H., 2011. "How Do Different Countries Use Labeling Standards: A Case Study Comparing Wisconsin Real Cheese to Parmigiano-Reggiano," 2011 International European Forum, February 14-18, 2011, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 122015, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    4. Marette, Stephan, 2009. "Can Foreign Producers Benefit from Geographical Indications under the New European Regulation?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(01), pages 1-12.
    5. repec:lic:licosd:37215 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. repec:ken:wpaper:0802 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Le Goffic, Caroline & Zappalaglio, Andrea, 2017. "The Role Played by the US Government in Protecting Geographical Indications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 35-44.
    8. Cristina Vaquero Piñeiro & Daniele Curzi, 2024. "Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 653-671, June.
    9. Manuel Garcia & Carlos Carpio & Darren Hudson & Tullaya Boonsaeng & Chenggang Wang, 2024. "Mexican consumers' perceptions and preferences for US and Texas beef," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(4), pages 727-748, October.
    10. Bruce A. Babcock & Dermot J. Hayes & John D. Lawrence & Roxanne Clemens, 2007. "Creating a Geographically Linked Brand for High-Quality Beef: A Case Study," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 07-mbp13, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    11. Babcock, Bruce & Hayes, Dermot J. & Lawrence, John & Clemens, Roxanne L., 2008. "Creating a Geographically Linked Collective Brand for High-Quality Beef: A Case Study," ISU General Staff Papers 200801010800001480, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    12. Stephan Marette & Roxanne Clemens & Bruce Babcock, 2008. "Recent international and regulatory decisions about geographical indications," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(4), pages 453-472.
    13. Anders, Sven M. & Caswell, Julie A., 2009. "The Benefits and Costs of Proliferation of Geographical Labeling for Developing Countries," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(01), pages 1-17.
    14. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    15. repec:lic:licosd:40818 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Patterson, Paul M. & Martinez, Samuel Cardona, 2004. "State and Origin Branding in Hispanic Food Markets," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 35(3), pages 1-12, November.
    17. Koen Deconinck & Jo Swinnen, 2021. "The Size of Terroir: A Theoretical Note on Economics and Politics of Geographical Indications," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 321-328, February.
    18. Egelyng, Henrik & Bosselmann, Aske S. & Warui, Mary & Maina, Fredah & Mburu, John & Gyau, Amos, 2017. "Origin products from African forests: A Kenyan pathway to prosperity and green inclusive growth?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 38-46.
    19. Lim, Kar Ho & Hu, Wuyang & Maynard, Leigh J. & Goddard, Ellen W., "undated". "Willingness to Pay for Imported Beef and Risk Perception: An application of Individual-Level Parameter," 2012 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2012, Birmingham, Alabama 119755, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Jay Corrigan & Matthew Rousu, 2008. "Estimating the value consumers derive from product labeling," Framed Field Experiments 00192, The Field Experiments Website.
    21. Jianyu Yu & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Production standards, competition and vertical relationship," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(1), pages 79-111.
    22. Dentoni, Domenico & Menozzi, Davide & Capelli, Maria Giacinta, "undated". "Heterogeneity of Members’ Characteristics and Cooperation within Producer Groups Regulating Geographical Indications: The Case of the “Prosciutto di Parma” Consortium," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95203, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.