IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-05389626.html

Conservatives, Progressives and Transformers: The Influence of Marketers' Biases on Sustainable Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Sophie Richit

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon)

  • Aurélie Hemonnet‐goujot

    (CERGAM - Centre d'Études et de Recherche en Gestion d'Aix-Marseille - AMU - Aix Marseille Université - UTLN - Université de Toulon, AMU IAE - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Aix-en-Provence - AMU - Aix Marseille Université)

Abstract

The inherent uncertainty of the innovation process, amplified by the complexity of the Anthropocene, means that marketers are likely to be subject to decision‐making biases that can affect sustainable product innovation. In parallel, new approaches to sustainability and innovation management are emerging, aiming to mitigate such biases and accelerate the sustainable transition. Yet, research into the critical role of individual decision‐making in innovation management is still in its early stages. Drawing on the theoretical fields of behavioural strategy, innovation management and sustainability, and using 19 case studies, our research reveals the existence of three profiles of marketers based on their attitude towards sustainable innovation: ‘conservatives', ‘progressives' and ‘transformers'. We demonstrate that these profiles are linked to specific decision‐making biases and explore how these biases shape the sustainability level of a new product. From a theoretical perspective, by bridging sustainability and innovation management through the lens of behavioural strategy, this paper improves our understanding of why fundamental differences in sustainable innovation processes and outcomes exist. Our research contributes to the existing literature on the topic by developing a typology of marketers towards sustainable innovation, and by identifying new cognitive biases in marketing practices. It reveals which biases hinder sustainable innovation and which ones positively influence the sustainability of new products.

Suggested Citation

  • Sophie Richit & Aurélie Hemonnet‐goujot, 2025. "Conservatives, Progressives and Transformers: The Influence of Marketers' Biases on Sustainable Innovation," Post-Print hal-05389626, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05389626
    DOI: 10.1111/caim.70027
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://amu.hal.science/hal-05389626v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://amu.hal.science/hal-05389626v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/caim.70027?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hoch, Stephen J, 1988. "Who Do We Know: Predicting the Interests and Opinions of the American Consumer," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 15(3), pages 315-324, December.
    2. Paul C. Nutt, 2011. "Making decision‐making research matter: some issues and remedies," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 5-16, January.
    3. repec:osf:osfxxx:rdv73_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ben Lee & Shekhar Misra & Christophe Haon, 2024. "Marketers on board: The influence of marketing-experienced board members (MEBMs) on firm innovativeness inputs and the moderating roles of CEO job characteristics," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(3), pages 859-891, May.
    5. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Olivier Toubia & Raena Saddler, 2023. "Editorial: Marketing’s Role in the Evolving Discipline of Product Management," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(1), pages 1-5, January.
    6. John Hauser & Gerard J. Tellis & Abbie Griffin, 2006. "Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(6), pages 687-717, 11-12.
    7. Paul C. Nutt, 2011. "Making decision‐making research matter: some issues and remedies," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 5-16, January.
    8. Ivo Hristov & Riccardo Camilli & Alessandro Mechelli, 2022. "Cognitive biases in implementing a performance management system: behavioral strategy for supporting managers’ decision-making processes," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(9), pages 1110-1136, March.
    9. Rudy Moenaert & Henry Robben & Michael Antioco & Veroniek de Schamphelaere & Eveline Roks, 2010. "Strategic Innovation Decisions : What You Foresee Is Not What You Get," Post-Print hal-02312522, HAL.
    10. Matteo Cristofaro, 2017. "Reducing biases of decision-making processes in complex organizations," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 270-291, March.
    11. R.K. Moenaert & H. Robben & M. Antioco, 2010. "Strategic Innovation Decisions: What You Foresee Is Not What You Get," Post-Print halshs-00585669, HAL.
    12. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Barbara Burkhard & Nicolai J. Foss & Dietmar Grichnik & Riikka M. Sarala & Yi Tang & Marc Van Essen, 2023. "The Heuristics and Biases of Top Managers: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1033-1063, July.
    13. Ivo Hristov & Riccardo Camilli & Alessandro Mechelli, 2022. "Cognitive biases in implementing a performance management system: behavioral strategy for supporting managers’ decision-making processes," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(9), pages 1110-1136, March.
    14. Gergana Y. Nenkov, 2024. "Shifting focus in the fight against core environmental challenges," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1273-1278, October.
    15. Sebastian Kruse & David Bendig & Malte Brettel, 2023. "How Does CEO Decision Style Influence Firm Performance? The Mediating Role of Speed and Innovativeness in New Product Development," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1205-1235, July.
    16. Michael Antioco & Rudy Moenaert & Adam Lindgreen, 2008. "Reducing ongoing product design decision-making bias," Post-Print hal-02312525, HAL.
    17. Paul C. Nutt, 2011. "Making decision‐making research matter: some issues and remedies," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 34(1), pages 5-16, January.
    18. Dhruv Grewal & Praveen K. Kopalle & John Hulland, 2024. "Addressing the greatest global challenges (UN SDGs) with a marketing lens," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 52(5), pages 1263-1272, October.
    19. Miles M. Yang & Wansi Chen & Yue Wang, 2022. "What explains managers’ escalating behaviors in a failing NPD project? The impact of managerial perceptions of opportunities and threats in a stage-gate process," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(3), pages 541-579, May.
    20. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    21. Michael Gibbert & Winfried Ruigrok & Barbara Wicki, 2008. "What passes as a rigorous case study?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(13), pages 1465-1474, December.
    22. Kirk Plangger & Matteo Montecchi & Ko Ruyter & Debbie I. Keeling & Maura L. Scott & Darren W. Dahl, 2025. "“We could be heroes”: Reflections on reimagining marketing strategies for a better world," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 301-309, March.
    23. Matteo Cristofaro, 2017. "Reducing biases of decision-making processes in complex organizations," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 270-291, March.
    24. Leigh McAlister & Frank Germann & Natalie Chisam & Pete Hayes & Adriana Lynch & Bill Stewart, 2023. "A taxonomy of marketing organizations," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 617-635, May.
    25. Paula Anzola-Román & Teresa Garcia-Marco & Ferdaous Zouaghi, 2024. "The Influence of CSR Orientation on Innovative Performance: Is the Effect Conditioned to the Implementation of Organizational Practices?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 261-278, February.
    26. Radu Atanasiu & Riku Ruotsalainen & Svetlana N. Khapova, 2023. "A Simple Rule is Born: How CEOs Distill Heuristics," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1064-1104, July.
    27. Busenitz, Lowell W. & Barney, Jay B., 1997. "Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in large organizations: Biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 9-30, January.
    28. Giovanni Gavetti, 2012. "PERSPECTIVE—Toward a Behavioral Theory of Strategy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 267-285, February.
    29. Rajan Varadarajan, 2017. "Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 14-36, January.
    30. Wierenga, Berend, 2011. "Managerial decision making in marketing: The next research frontier," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 89-101.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerard P. Hodgkinson & Barbara Burkhard & Nicolai J. Foss & Dietmar Grichnik & Riikka M. Sarala & Yi Tang & Marc Van Essen, 2023. "The Heuristics and Biases of Top Managers: Past, Present, and Future," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(5), pages 1033-1063, July.
    2. Liang (Arthur) Li & Paul W. Beamish & Andreas P. J. Schotter, 2024. "General manager succession dynamics in MNE foreign subsidiaries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 55(9), pages 1151-1169, December.
    3. Heira Georgina Valdez-Bocanegra & Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán & Ricardo Valdez-González, 2020. "Effects of Innovation on Competitiveness and Performance: Empirical Evidence in the State of Guanajuato in Mexico," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 1-4.
    4. Riccardo Camilli & Alessandro Mechelli & Alessandra Stefanoni & Fabrizio Rossi, 2023. "Addressing Managerial Loss Aversion for the Corporate Value Creation Process: A Critical Analysis of the Literature and Preliminary Approaches," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    6. T. K. Das & Bing-Sheng Teng, 1998. "Time and Entrepreneurial Risk Behavior," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 22(2), pages 69-88, January.
    7. Lévesque, Moren & Schade, Christian, 2002. "Intuitive optimizing for time allocation decisions in newly formed ventures," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2002,24, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    8. Jaeyeob Jeong & Myeonggil Choi, 2017. "The Expected Job Satisfaction Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention as Career Choice in the Cultural and Artistic Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, September.
    9. Christopher Dawson & David de Meza & Andrew Henley & G. Reza Arabsheibani, 2014. "Entrepreneurship: Cause and Consequence of Financial Optimism," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 717-742, December.
    10. Dan K. Hsu & Johan Wiklund & Richard D. Cotton, 2017. "Success, Failure, and Entrepreneurial Reentry: An Experimental Assessment of the Veracity of Self–Efficacy and Prospect Theory," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(1), pages 19-47, January.
    11. Rodney C. Shrader & Mark Simon & Steven Stanton, 2021. "Financial forecasting and risky decisions: an experimental study grounded in Prospect theory," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1827-1841, December.
    12. Daniel V. Holland & Dean A. Shepherd, 2013. "Deciding to Persist: Adversity, Values, and Entrepreneurs’ Decision Policies," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 37(2), pages 331-358, March.
    13. Nagel, Christian & Heidenreich, Sven & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Enhancing Adoption of Sustainable Product Innovations: Addressing Reduced Performance with Risk-Reducing Product Modifications," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Thomas Astebro & Frank Fossen & Cédric Gutierrez, 2024. "Entrepreneurs: Clueless, Biased, Poor Heuristics, or Bayesian Machines?," Working Papers hal-04759301, HAL.
    15. Antioco, Michael & Coussement, Kristof, 2018. "Misreading of consumer dissatisfaction in online product reviews: Writing style as a cause for bias," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 301-310.
    16. Dubard Barbosa, Saulo & Fayolle, Alain & Smith, Brett R., 2019. "Biased and overconfident, unbiased but going for it: How framing and anchoring affect the decision to start a new venture," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 528-557.
    17. Levesque, Moren & Schade, Christian, 2005. "Intuitive optimizing: experimental findings on time allocation decisions with newly formed ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 313-342, May.
    18. Hunt, Richard A., 2021. "Entrepreneurial orientation and the fate of corporate acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 241-255.
    19. Megan Yuan Li & Shige Makino & Lingli Luo & Chunyan Jiang, 2024. "Entrepreneurial passion and organizational innovation: The moderating effects of events and the competence to exploit events," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 549-582, June.
    20. Kambiz Talebi & Pouria Nouri & Abdolah Ahmadi Kafeshani, 2014. "What Factors Contribute to Entrepreneurs’ Decision Making Biases? A Comprehensive Study," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 4(2), pages 59-68.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-05389626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.