IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-04040360.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Spatial priorities for invasive alien species control in protected areas

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Courtois

    (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier)

  • César Martinez

    (BioSP - Biostatistique et Processus Spatiaux - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

  • Alban Thomas

    (UMR PSAE - Paris-Saclay Applied Economics - AgroParisTech - Université Paris-Saclay - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, US ODR - Observatoire des Programmes Communautaires de Développement Rural - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)

Abstract

Given the limited funds available for the management of invasive alien species (IASs), there is a need to design cost-effective strategies to prioritize their control. In this paper, we propose a cost-benefit optimization framework that incorporates the spatially explicit costs and benefits of invasion control, as well as the spatial invasion dynamics. Our framework offers a simple yet operational priority-setting criterion for the spatially explicit management of IASs under budget constraints. We applied this criterion to the control of the invasion of primrose willow (genus Ludwigia) in a protected area in France. Using a unique geographic information system panel dataset on control costs and invasion levels through space for a 20-year period, we estimated the costs of invasion control and a spatial econometric model of primrose willow invasion dynamics. Next, we used a field choice experiment to estimate the spatially explicit benefits of invasion control. Applying our priority criterion, we show that, unlike the current management strategy that controls the invasion in a spatially homogeneous manner, the criterion recommends targeted control on heavily invaded areas that are highly valued by users. We also show that the returns on investment are high, justifying the need to increase the allocated budgets and to treat the invasion more drastically. We conclude with policy recommendations and possible extensions, including the development of operational cost-benefit decision-support tools to assist local decision-makers in setting management priorities.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Courtois & César Martinez & Alban Thomas, 2023. "Spatial priorities for invasive alien species control in protected areas," Post-Print hal-04040360, HAL.
  • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04040360
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162675
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04040360v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-04040360v1/document
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162675?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:hal:journl:hal-03792877 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Roy Brouwer & Julia Martin-Ortega & RJulio Berbel, 2010. "Spatial Preference Heterogeneity: A Choice Experiment," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 86(3).
    3. Baltagi, Badi H. & Fingleton, Bernard & Pirotte, Alain, 2014. "Spatial lag models with nested random effects: An instrumental variable procedure with an application to English house prices," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 76-86.
    4. Christophe Diagne & Boris Leroy & Anne-Charlotte Vaissière & Rodolphe E. Gozlan & David Roiz & Ivan Jarić & Jean-Michel Salles & Corey J. A. Bradshaw & Franck Courchamp, 2021. "High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide," Nature, Nature, vol. 592(7855), pages 571-576, April.
    5. Kailin Kroetz & James N. Sanchirico, 2015. "The Bioeconomics of Spatial-Dynamic Systems in Natural Resource Management," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 7(1), pages 189-207, October.
    6. Douadia Bougherara & Pierre Courtois & Maia David & Joakim Weill, 2022. "Spatial preferences for invasion management: a choice experiment on the control of Ludwigia grandiflora in a French regional park," Post-Print hal-03476692, HAL.
    7. Badi H. Baltagi & Bernard Fingleton & Alain Pirotte, 2014. "Estimating and Forecasting with a Dynamic Spatial Panel Data Model," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(1), pages 112-138, February.
    8. Douadia Bougherara & Pierre Courtois & Maia David & Joakim Weill, 2022. "Spatial preferences for invasion management: a choice experiment on controlling Ludwigia grandiflora in a French regional park [Préférences spatiales pour la gestion des invasions : une expérience ," Post-Print hal-03554336, HAL.
    9. Epanchin-Niell, Rebecca S. & Wilen, James E., 2012. "Optimal spatial control of biological invasions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 260-270.
    10. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.
    11. Blackwood, Julie & Hastings, Alan & Costello, Christopher, 2010. "Cost-effective management of invasive species using linear-quadratic control," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 519-527, January.
    12. Baltagi, Badi H., 2015. "The Oxford Handbook of Panel Data," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199940042, Decembrie.
    13. Nick Hanley & Charles Perrings, 2019. "The Economic Value of Biodiversity," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 11(1), pages 355-375, October.
    14. David Aadland & Charles Sims & David Finnoff, 2015. "Spatial Dynamics of Optimal Management in Bioeconomic Systems," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 45(4), pages 545-577, April.
    15. Ross N Cuthbert & Christophe Diagne & Emma J Hudgins & Anna Turbelin & Danish A Ahmed & Céline Albert & Thomas W Bodey & Elizabeta Briski & Franz Essl & Phillip J Haubrock & Rodolphe E Gozlan & Natali, 2022. "Biological invasion costs reveal insufficient proactive management worldwide," Post-Print hal-03860581, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giovanni De Feo & Eleonora De Cicco & Luisa Bocciero, 2025. "A Comprehensive Multicriteria Analysis of Italian Regional Parks: Advancing Environmental Management and Benchmarking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-22, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight, 2018. "A review of operations research models in invasive species management: state of the art, challenges, and future directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 271(2), pages 357-403, December.
    2. Kıbış, Eyyüb Y. & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra, 2017. "Optimizing invasive species management: A mixed-integer linear programming approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(1), pages 308-321.
    3. Eyyüb Y. Kıbış & İ. Esra Büyüktahtakın & Robert G. Haight & Najmaddin Akhundov & Kathleen Knight & Charles E. Flower, 2021. "A Multistage Stochastic Programming Approach to the Optimal Surveillance and Control of the Emerald Ash Borer in Cities," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 808-834, May.
    4. Liu, Ming & Wu, Jiani & Zhang, Shuhua & Liang, Jing, 2023. "Cyanobacterial blooms management: A modified optimization model for interdisciplinary research," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    5. Costello, Christopher & Quérou, Nicolas & Tomini, Agnes, 2017. "Private eradication of mobile public bads," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 23-44.
    6. Reinhold Kosfeld & Christian Dreger, 2018. "Local and spatial cointegration in the wage curve – a spatial panel analysis for german regions," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 38(1), pages 53-75, February.
    7. Ismael Soto & Ross N Cuthbert & Antonín Kouba & César Capinha & Anna Turbelin & Emma J Hudgins & Christophe Diagne & Franck Courchamp & Phillip J Haubrock, 2022. "Global economic costs of herpetofauna invasions," Post-Print hal-03860530, HAL.
    8. Grogan, Kelly A. & Chakravarty, Shourish, 2017. "The Feasibility of Area-wide Pest Management under Heterogeneity and Uncertainty: The Case of Citrus Health Management Areas," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259188, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Bonneau, Mathieu & Martin, Julien & Peyrard, Nathalie & Rodgers, Leroy & Romagosa, Christina M. & Johnson, Fred A., 2019. "Optimal spatial allocation of control effort to manage invasives in the face of imperfect detection and misclassification," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 108-116.
    10. Liu, Yanxu & Sims, Charles, 2016. "Spatial-dynamic externalities and coordination in invasive species control," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 23-38.
    11. Gray, Dennis & Fan, Xiaoli, 2020. "Optimal Control of Mountain Pine Beetle Under Different Climate Scenarios: A Spatiotemporal Bioeconomic Model," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304436, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Kovacs, Kent F. & Haight, Robert G. & Mercader, Rodrigo J. & McCullough, Deborah G., 2014. "A bioeconomic analysis of an emerald ash borer invasion of an urban forest with multiple jurisdictions," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 270-289.
    13. Sims, Charles & Aadland, David & Finnoff, David & Hochard, Jacob, 2020. "What are the benefits of delisting endangered species and who receives them?: Lessons from the gray wolf recovery in Greater Yellowstone," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Emma J. Hudgins & Ross N. Cuthbert & Phillip J. Haubrock & Nigel G. Taylor & Melina Kourantidou & Dat Nguyen & Alok Bang & Anna J. Turbelin & Desika Moodley & Elizabeta Briski & Syrmalenia G. Kotronak, 2023. "Unevenly distributed biological invasion costs among origin and recipient regions," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(9), pages 1113-1124, September.
    15. Onal, Sevilay & Akhundov, Najmaddin & Büyüktahtakın, İ. Esra & Smith, Jennifer & Houseman, Gregory R., 2020. "An integrated simulation-optimization framework to optimize search and treatment path for controlling a biological invader," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Charles Sims & David Finnoff & Jason F. Shogren, 2018. "Taking One for the Team: Is Collective Action More Responsive to Ecological Change?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(3), pages 589-615, July.
    17. Kelly M. Cobourn & Gregory S. Amacher & Robert G. Haight, 2019. "Cooperative Management of Invasive Species: A Dynamic Nash Bargaining Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 72(4), pages 1041-1068, April.
    18. Albers, Heidi J. & Hall, Kim Meyer & Lee, Katherine D. & Taleghan, Majid Alkaee & Dietterich, Thomas G., 2018. "The Role of Restoration and Key Ecological Invasion Mechanisms in Optimal Spatial-Dynamic Management of Invasive Species," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 44-54.
    19. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    20. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-04040360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.