IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03711784.html

Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables

Author

Listed:
  • Inès Chouk

    (THEMA - Théorie économique, modélisation et applications - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université)

  • Zied Mani

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

Purpose Consumers are increasingly connected to, and make use of, a multitude of technologies in their daily lives. The exponential growth in the use of Internet of Things (IoT)-based services is ushering in a new era of e-services, in which the service experience is becoming autonomous (intelligence), devices are intercommunicating (connectivity) and consumers can access the service anytime, anywhere and using any device (ubiquity). However, a number of challenges have arisen. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors that reduce consumer resistance to smart services (factors against resistance) and factors that promote this resistance (factors for resistance), by means of a dual-factor approach. Design/methodology/approach To test this theoretical model, the authors developed a Web-based survey and used structural equation modeling. Findings Results show that consumer-lifestyle factors (individual "mobiquity" and self-image congruence) reduce consumer resistance to smart services (factors against resistance). Conversely, innovation-related factors (perceived security, perceived complexity) and ecosystem-related factors (perceived government surveillance and general skepticism toward IoT) promote consumer resistance to smart services (factors for resistance). In addition, general skepticism toward IoT has a significant positive effect on perceived complexity, perceived security risk and perceived government surveillance. Originality/value This research investigates consumer resistance to smart services using a dual-factor perspective (Cenfetelli, 2004; Claudy et al. , 2015): factors reducing resistance versus factors promoting resistance. This paper provides evidence for the importance of consumer lifestyle-related factors, innovation-related factors and ecosystem-related factors in explaining consumer resistance to smart services. This work enriches previous studies of consumer resistance to innovation (Ram and Sheth, 1989; Ram, 1987) by studying original variables (individual mobiquity, technological innovativeness, government surveillance).

Suggested Citation

  • Inès Chouk & Zied Mani, 2019. "Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables," Post-Print hal-03711784, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03711784
    DOI: 10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0046
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-03711784v1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hal.science/hal-03711784v1/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0046?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roehrich, Gilles, 2004. "Consumer innovativeness: Concepts and measurements," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(6), pages 671-677, June.
    2. Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Davidson, Rosemary & Bicket, Martha & Whitmarsh, Lorraine, 2013. "Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 363-374.
    3. Inès Chouk & Zied Mani, 2017. "Drivers of consumers’ resistance to smart products," Post-Print hal-02980400, HAL.
    4. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    5. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    6. Dominique Roux, 2007. "Consumer Resistance: Proposal for an Integrative Framework," Post-Print hal-02022227, HAL.
    7. Westaby, James D., 2005. "Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 97-120, November.
    8. Inman, J. Jeffrey & Nikolova, Hristina, 2017. "Shopper-Facing Retail Technology: A Retailer Adoption Decision Framework Incorporating Shopper Attitudes and Privacy Concerns," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 7-28.
    9. Shankar, Venkatesh & Venkatesh, Alladi & Hofacker, Charles & Naik, Prasad, 2010. "Mobile Marketing in the Retailing Environment: Current Insights and Future Research Avenues," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 24(2), pages 111-120.
    10. Wiedmann, Klaus-Peter & Hennigs, Nadine & Pankalla, Lars & Kassubek, Martin & Seegebarth, Barbara, 2011. "Adoption barriers and resistance to sustainable solutions in the automotive sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(11), pages 1201-1206.
    11. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2018. "Consumer resistance to innovation in services: Challenges and barriers in the Internet of Things era," Post-Print hal-03700875, HAL.
    12. Gary C. Moore & Izak Benbasat, 1991. "Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 192-222, September.
    13. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    14. Sarrina Li, Shu-Chu, 2013. "Lifestyle orientations and the adoption of Internet-related technologies in Taiwan," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 639-650.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Yongheng & Xu, Qian & Jin, Liyin, 2021. "The effect of smart and connected products on consumer brand choice concentration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 163-172.
    2. Krisna Nugraha & Muhtosim Arief & Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro & Pantri Heriyati, 2022. "Factors Influencing Bank Customers’ Orientations toward Islamic Banks: Indonesian Banking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    4. Loh, Xiu-Ming & Lee, Voon-Hsien & Leong, Lai-Ying & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Cham, Tat-Huei & Tang, Yun-Chia & Hew, Jun-Jie, 2023. "Understanding consumers’ resistance to pay with cryptocurrency in the sharing economy: A hybrid SEM-fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    5. Yingying Yang & Peng Lu & Yuanyuan Niu & Guohong Yuan, 2024. "Research on Unmanned Smart Hotels Resistance from the Perspective of Innovation Resistance Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    6. Yongzhi Gong & Xiaofei Tang & En-Chung Chang, 2023. "Group norms and policy norms trigger different autonomous motivations for Chinese investors in cryptocurrency investment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Marie-E. Godefroid & Ralf Plattfaut & Björn Niehaves, 2023. "How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1667-1711, December.
    8. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Joon-ho Kim & Seung-hye Jung & Bong-ihn Seok & Hyun-ju Choi, 2022. "The Relationship among Four Lifestyles of Workers amid the COVID-19 Pandemic (Work–Life Balance, YOLO, Minimal Life, and Staycation) and Organizational Effectiveness: With a Focus on Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, October.
    10. Kamal Basha, Norazlyn & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2022. "Are we so over smartwatches? Or can technology, fashion, and psychographic attributes sustain smartwatch usage?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Roy, Sanjit K. & Singh, Gaganpreet & Hollebeek, Linda D. & Shabnam, Saadia & Japutra, Arnold & van Doorn, Sebastian & Ray, Subhasis & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2024. "Smart service value: Conceptualization, scale development, and validation in the retailing context," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    12. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    13. Henkens, Bieke & Verleye, Katrien & Larivière, Bart, 2021. "The smarter, the better?! Customer well-being, engagement, and perceptions in smart service systems," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 425-447.
    14. Radosław Malik & Anna Visvizi & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2022. "Smart Services in Smart Cities: Insights from Science Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    15. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    16. Gong, Taeshik & Wang, Chen-Ya & Lee, Kangcheol, 2022. "Effects of characteristics of in-store retail technology on customer citizenship behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Faten Baklouti & Fayçal Boukamcha, 2024. "Consumer resistance to internet banking services: implications for the innovation resistance theory," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 364-376, June.
    18. Alexander, Bethan & Kent, Anthony, 2022. "Change in technology-enabled omnichannel customer experiences in-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2018. "Consumer resistance to innovation in services: Challenges and barriers in the Internet of Things era," Post-Print hal-03700875, HAL.
    2. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Hajiheydari, Nastaran & Delgosha, Mohammad Soltani & Olya, Hossein, 2021. "Scepticism and resistance to IoMT in healthcare: Application of behavioural reasoning theory with configurational perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    4. Anshu, Kumari & Shankar, Amit & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Laker, Benjamin, 2022. "Impact of barriers of value co-creation on consumers' innovation resistance behavior: Investigating the moderation role of the DART model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Faten Baklouti & Fayçal Boukamcha, 2024. "Consumer resistance to internet banking services: implications for the innovation resistance theory," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 364-376, June.
    6. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Heidenreich, Sven & Killmer, Jan F. & Millemann, Jan A., 2022. "If at first you don't adopt - Investigating determinants of new product leapfrogging behavior," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    8. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    9. Boeuf, Benjamin, 2019. "The impact of mortality anxiety on attitude toward product innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 44-60.
    10. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    11. Sun, Yang, 2021. "Case based models of the relationship between consumer resistance to innovation and customer churn," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    12. Nel, Jacques & Boshoff, Christo, 2021. "“I just don't like digital-only banks, and you should not use them either†: Traditional-bank customers' opposition to using digital-only banks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    13. Petschnig, Martin & Heidenreich, Sven & Spieth, Patrick, 2014. "Innovative alternatives take action – Investigating determinants of alternative fuel vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 68-83.
    14. Gao, Tao (Tony) & Rohm, Andrew J. & Sultan, Fareena & Pagani, Margherita, 2013. "Consumers un-tethered: A three-market empirical study of consumers' mobile marketing acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2536-2544.
    15. Canestrino, Rossella & Bonfanti, Angelo & Magliocca, Pierpaolo & Caputo, Francesco, 2025. "Navigating human-technology dynamics: Exploring innovation resistance to smartphone apps in amusement parks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    16. Querci, Ilaria & Monsurrò, Luigi & Peverini, Paolo, 2024. "When anthropomorphism backfires: Anticipation of negative social roles as a source of resistance to smart object adoption," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2020. "What will be the possible barriers to consumers’ adoption of smart home services?," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    18. Chaouali, Walid & Souiden, Nizar, 2019. "The role of cognitive age in explaining mobile banking resistance among elderly people," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 342-350.
    19. Mahmud, Hasan & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Mitra, Ranjan Kumar, 2023. "What drives managers towards algorithm aversion and how to overcome it? Mitigating the impact of innovation resistance through technology readiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Hong, Areum & Nam, Changi & Kim, Seongcheol, 2017. "Analysis of the barriers that consumers encounter when smart home service is introduced in South Korea," 14th ITS Asia-Pacific Regional Conference, Kyoto 2017: Mapping ICT into Transformation for the Next Information Society 168486, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03711784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.