IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/hal-03711784.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables

Author

Listed:
  • Inès Chouk

    (THEMA - Théorie économique, modélisation et applications - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - CY - CY Cergy Paris Université)

  • Zied Mani

    (LEMNA - Laboratoire d'économie et de management de Nantes Atlantique - IEMN-IAE Nantes - Institut d'Économie et de Management de Nantes - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises - Nantes - UN - Université de Nantes)

Abstract

Purpose Consumers are increasingly connected to, and make use of, a multitude of technologies in their daily lives. The exponential growth in the use of Internet of Things (IoT)-based services is ushering in a new era of e-services, in which the service experience is becoming autonomous (intelligence), devices are intercommunicating (connectivity) and consumers can access the service anytime, anywhere and using any device (ubiquity). However, a number of challenges have arisen. The purpose of this paper is to investigate factors that reduce consumer resistance to smart services (factors against resistance) and factors that promote this resistance (factors for resistance), by means of a dual-factor approach. Design/methodology/approach To test this theoretical model, the authors developed a Web-based survey and used structural equation modeling. Findings Results show that consumer-lifestyle factors (individual "mobiquity" and self-image congruence) reduce consumer resistance to smart services (factors against resistance). Conversely, innovation-related factors (perceived security, perceived complexity) and ecosystem-related factors (perceived government surveillance and general skepticism toward IoT) promote consumer resistance to smart services (factors for resistance). In addition, general skepticism toward IoT has a significant positive effect on perceived complexity, perceived security risk and perceived government surveillance. Originality/value This research investigates consumer resistance to smart services using a dual-factor perspective (Cenfetelli, 2004; Claudy et al. , 2015): factors reducing resistance versus factors promoting resistance. This paper provides evidence for the importance of consumer lifestyle-related factors, innovation-related factors and ecosystem-related factors in explaining consumer resistance to smart services. This work enriches previous studies of consumer resistance to innovation (Ram and Sheth, 1989; Ram, 1987) by studying original variables (individual mobiquity, technological innovativeness, government surveillance).

Suggested Citation

  • Inès Chouk & Zied Mani, 2019. "Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables," Post-Print hal-03711784, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03711784
    DOI: 10.1108/JSM-01-2018-0046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Joon-ho Kim & Seung-hye Jung & Bong-ihn Seok & Hyun-ju Choi, 2022. "The Relationship among Four Lifestyles of Workers amid the COVID-19 Pandemic (Work–Life Balance, YOLO, Minimal Life, and Staycation) and Organizational Effectiveness: With a Focus on Four Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-31, October.
    3. Liang, Yongheng & Xu, Qian & Jin, Liyin, 2021. "The effect of smart and connected products on consumer brand choice concentration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 163-172.
    4. Kamal Basha, Norazlyn & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Chuah, Stephanie Hui-Wen, 2022. "Are we so over smartwatches? Or can technology, fashion, and psychographic attributes sustain smartwatch usage?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Gyutae Lee & Yunsik Kim, 2022. "Effects of Resistance Barriers to Service Robots on Alternative Attractiveness and Intention to Use," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    6. Henkens, Bieke & Verleye, Katrien & Larivière, Bart, 2021. "The smarter, the better?! Customer well-being, engagement, and perceptions in smart service systems," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 425-447.
    7. Radosław Malik & Anna Visvizi & Orlando Troisi & Mara Grimaldi, 2022. "Smart Services in Smart Cities: Insights from Science Mapping Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Krisna Nugraha & Muhtosim Arief & Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro & Pantri Heriyati, 2022. "Factors Influencing Bank Customers’ Orientations toward Islamic Banks: Indonesian Banking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    9. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    10. Gong, Taeshik & Wang, Chen-Ya & Lee, Kangcheol, 2022. "Effects of characteristics of in-store retail technology on customer citizenship behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    11. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Loh, Xiu-Ming & Lee, Voon-Hsien & Leong, Lai-Ying & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Cham, Tat-Huei & Tang, Yun-Chia & Hew, Jun-Jie, 2023. "Understanding consumers’ resistance to pay with cryptocurrency in the sharing economy: A hybrid SEM-fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Alexander, Bethan & Kent, Anthony, 2022. "Change in technology-enabled omnichannel customer experiences in-store," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    14. Yongzhi Gong & Xiaofei Tang & En-Chung Chang, 2023. "Group norms and policy norms trigger different autonomous motivations for Chinese investors in cryptocurrency investment," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03711784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.