IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i19p12506-d930706.html

Factors Influencing Bank Customers’ Orientations toward Islamic Banks: Indonesian Banking Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Krisna Nugraha

    (Research in Management, Doctorate Program, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

  • Muhtosim Arief

    (Research in Management, Doctorate Program, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

  • Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro

    (Research in Management, Doctorate Program, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

  • Pantri Heriyati

    (Research in Management, Doctorate Program, BINUS Business School, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia)

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Indonesian banking industry showed positive performance, high profitability, sustainable growth, and stability. Islamic banks grew by 9.50% and had a market share of 6.52 percent as of September 2021. This study aims to examine the industrial sector perspective on the factors that prevent consumers from becoming customers of Islamic banks, in particular the factors that influence consumer decisions not to become Sharia bank customers. This study used descriptive qualitative methods and in-depth interviews to confirm and obtain input from industry representatives regarding Islamic banks. Primary data collection was performed using a purposive sampling technique. Informants were head office officials, managers, heads of individual retail product development units, product features and policies, market education, marketing, customer acquisition, and individual retailers. The findings of this study are the existence of passive resistance of consumers to become customers of Islamic banks. In addition, there are obstacles for prospective customers of Islamic banks in responding to marketing stimuli due to the perception of risk, image, and weak marketing reach that have dominated passive resistance to Islamic banks (blocking effects). As a result, consumers prefer conventional banks and are less interested in becoming customers of Islamic banks. This means that there is no opposition to Islamic banks.

Suggested Citation

  • Krisna Nugraha & Muhtosim Arief & Sri Bramantoro Abdinagoro & Pantri Heriyati, 2022. "Factors Influencing Bank Customers’ Orientations toward Islamic Banks: Indonesian Banking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12506-:d:930706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12506/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/19/12506/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Moez Ltifi & Lubica Hikkerova & Boualem Aliouat & Jameleddine Gharbi, 2016. "The determinants of the choice of Islamic banks in Tunisia," Post-Print halshs-01267061, HAL.
    3. Jünger, Moritz & Mietzner, Mark, 2020. "Banking goes digital: The adoption of FinTech services by German households," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    4. Mainardes, Emerson Wagner & Souza, Irailton Melo de & Correia, Rogério Dias, 2020. "Antecedents and consequents of consumers not adopting e-commerce," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    5. Ichsan Setiyo Budi, 2021. "Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility (ICSR) disclosure and Islamic Banks (IBs) performance: The application of stakeholder theory from Islamic perspective," Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, Accounting Department, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 25(1), pages 76-86.
    6. Emilio Abad-Segura & Mariana-Daniela González-Zamar & Eloy López-Meneses & Esteban Vázquez-Cano, 2020. "Financial Technology: Review of Trends, Approaches and Management," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-37, June.
    7. Seyed Mohammad Mosavi & Mohamad Sadegh Sangari & Abbas Keramati, 2018. "An integrative framework for customer switching behavior," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(15-16), pages 1067-1094, December.
    8. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2018. "Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 7(1), pages 23-48, March.
    9. Sarah Bayer & Henner Gimpel & Serkan Sarikaya, 2019. "Bank customers’ decision-making process in choosing between ethical and conventional banking: a survey-based examination," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(6), pages 655-697, August.
    10. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    11. Kelly, Bryan T. & Pruitt, Seth & Su, Yinan, 2019. "Characteristics are covariances: A unified model of risk and return," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(3), pages 501-524.
    12. Thakor, Anjan, 2020. "Corrigendum to: Fintech and Banking: What Do We Know?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    13. Mazhar Abbas & Muhammad Shahid Nawaz & Jamil Ahmad & Muhammad Ashraf, 2017. "The effect of innovation and consumer related factors on consumer resistance to innovation," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1312058-131, January.
    14. Seth, Himanshu & Talwar, Shalini & Bhatia, Anuj & Saxena, Akanksha & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumer resistance and inertia of retail investors: Development of the resistance adoption inertia continuance (RAIC) framework," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    15. Samuelson, William & Zeckhauser, Richard, 1988. "Status Quo Bias in Decision Making," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 7-59, March.
    16. Mohammad Enamul Hoque & M. Kabir Hassan & Nik Mohd Hazrul Nik Hashim & Tarek Zaher, 2019. "Factors affecting Islamic banking behavioral intention: the moderating effects of customer marketing practices and financial considerations," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 44-58, June.
    17. Inès Chouk & Zied Mani, 2019. "Factors for and against resistance to smart services: role of consumer lifestyle and ecosystem related variables," Post-Print hal-03711784, HAL.
    18. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    19. Jishnu Bhattacharyya & Soumyadeep Kundu & Manoj Kumar Dash & Shivam Dolhey, 2021. "An Investigation on Consumer Switching Behavior in an Asian Telecommunication Market," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(6), pages 105-125, November.
    20. Kuisma, Tuire & Laukkanen, Tommi & Hiltunen, Mika, 2007. "Mapping the reasons for resistance to Internet banking: A means-end approach," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 75-85.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adela Socol & Iulia Cristina Iuga, 2025. "Does democracy matter in banking performance? Exploring the linkage between democracy, economic freedom and banking performance in the European Union member states," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 86-116, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huang, Dan & Jin, Xin & Coghlan, Alexandra, 2021. "Advances in consumer innovation resistance research: A review and research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Ye Sang & Heeseung Yu & Eunkyoung Han, 2022. "Understanding the Barriers to Consumer Purchasing of Zero-Waste Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Fu, Shihui & Xue, Kunkun & Yang, Mengya & Wang, Xiaona, 2023. "An exploratory study on users' resistance to mobile app updates: Using netnography and fsQCA," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Canestrino, Rossella & Bonfanti, Angelo & Magliocca, Pierpaolo & Caputo, Francesco, 2025. "Navigating human-technology dynamics: Exploring innovation resistance to smartphone apps in amusement parks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    5. Loh, Xiu-Ming & Lee, Voon-Hsien & Leong, Lai-Ying & Aw, Eugene Cheng-Xi & Cham, Tat-Huei & Tang, Yun-Chia & Hew, Jun-Jie, 2023. "Understanding consumers’ resistance to pay with cryptocurrency in the sharing economy: A hybrid SEM-fsQCA approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    6. Talwar, Shalini & Talwar, Manish & Kaur, Puneet & Dhir, Amandeep, 2020. "Consumers’ resistance to digital innovations: A systematic review and framework development," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 286-299.
    7. Liu, Aiping & Urquía-Grande, Elena & López-Sánchez, Pilar & Rodríguez-López, Ángel, 2022. "How technology paradoxes and self-efficacy affect the resistance of facial recognition technology in online microfinance platforms: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    8. Faten Baklouti & Fayçal Boukamcha, 2024. "Consumer resistance to internet banking services: implications for the innovation resistance theory," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 364-376, June.
    9. Malodia, Suresh & Kaur, Puneet & Ractham, Peter & Sakashita, Mototaka & Dhir, Amandeep, 2022. "Why do people avoid and postpone the use of voice assistants for transactional purposes? A perspective from decision avoidance theory," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 605-618.
    10. Souheila Kaabachi & Sélima Ben Mrad & Fabienne Cadet & Ahmed Anis Charfi & Monyédodo Régis Kpossa, 2025. "Overcoming obstacles: the future of French Gen-Z in the metaverse. Does familiarity with current metaverse platforms play a key role?," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(3), pages 846-872, September.
    11. Li, Yongjun & Jin, Xi & Xue, Hanbing, 2025. "Avoid following individual shopping time habit to promote new products: Evidence from a randomized field experiment," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    12. Alex Ntsiful, 2025. "Sharing is caring for the environment: But why would managers resist shared mobility?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 612-633, January.
    13. Talwar, Manish & Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Islam, A.K.M. Najmul & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Positive and negative word of mouth (WOM) are not necessarily opposites: A reappraisal using the dual factor theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Zied Mani & Inès Chouk, 2018. "Consumer resistance to innovation in services: Challenges and barriers in the Internet of Things era," Post-Print hal-03700875, HAL.
    15. Jacques Nel & Christo Boshoff, 2023. "Unraveling the link between status quo satisfaction and the rejection of digital-only banks," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(1), pages 189-207, March.
    16. Chakraborty, Debarun & Singu, Hari Babu & Patre, Smruti, 2022. "Fitness Apps's purchase behaviour: Amalgamation of Stimulus-Organism-Behaviour-Consequence framework (S–O–B–C) and the innovation resistance theory (IRT)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    17. Marie-E. Godefroid & Ralf Plattfaut & Björn Niehaves, 2023. "How to measure the status quo bias? A review of current literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(4), pages 1667-1711, December.
    18. Alnoor, Alhamzah & Abbas, Sammar & Sadaa, Abdullah Mohammed & Chew, XinYing & Bayram, Gül Erkol, 2025. "Navigating the power of blockchain strategy: Analysis of technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework and innovation resistance theory using PLS-SEM and ANN insights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    19. Kumari, Pooja & Shankar, Amit & Behl, Abhishek & Pereira, Vijay & Yahiaoui, Dorra & Laker, Benjamin & Gupta, Brij B. & Arya, Varsha, 2024. "Investigating the barriers towards adoption and implementation of open innovation in healthcare," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    20. Sujeeth Ungratwar & Dipasha Sharma & Satish Kumar, 2025. "Mapping the digital banking landscape: a multi-dimensional exploration of fintech, digital payments, and e-wallets, with insights into current scenarios and future research," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-22, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:19:p:12506-:d:930706. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.