Lisbon Strategy implementation in 12 New EU Members – multivariate analysis of structural indicators
The aim of this article is to identify diversity between the EU-15 and the New Members in their implementation of the Lisbon Strategy in the period 2000-2010. By analyzing a set of structural indicators, we aim to fill a gap in the literature: a lack of publications providing complex evaluation of the implementation of the Lisbon Strategy using measurable indicators. The results of our analyses confirm the hypothesis of a large gap between the EU-15 countries and the 12 New Members in key areas of the Lisbon Strategy. According to rankings given by our taxonomic analyses, a high level of the indicators selected is confirmed only for the EU-15 countries and only three New Members belong to a group presenting the average level of these indicators. This study demonstrates a need for a significant intensification of the EU cohesion policy, which is one of the main tools for achieving the Lisbon Strategy goals.
|Date of creation:||Sep 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Phone: +48 58 347-18-99
Fax: +48 58 347-18-61
Web page: http://www.zie.pg.gda.pl
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Fernando Hervás Soriano & Fulvio Mulatero, 2010. "Knowledge Policy in the EU: From the Lisbon Strategy to Europe 2020," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer, vol. 1(4), pages 289-302, December.
- Alfonso Arpaia & Werner Roeger & Janos Varga & Jan in 't Veld & Alexandr Hobza & Isabel Grilo & Peter Wobst, 2007. "Quantitative assessment of Structural Reforms: Modelling the Lisbon Strategy," European Economy - Economic Papers 282, Directorate General Economic and Monetary Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
- Lorenzo Codogno & Guillaume Odinet & Flavio Padrini, 2009. "The Use of Targets in the Lisbon Strategy," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, issue 1, pages 3-21, January-M.
- Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2011.
"Lisbon strategy and EU countries’ performance: social inclusion and sustainability,"
Center for the Analysis of Public Policies (CAPP)
0088, Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia, Dipartimento di Economia "Marco Biagi".
- Paola Bertolini & Francesco Pagliacci, 2010. "Lisbon strategy and EU countries’ performance: social inclusion and sustainability," Department of Economics 0648, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
- Arno Tausch, 2010. "The European Union’s failed “Lisbon strategy”," Society and Economy, Akadémiai Kiadó, Hungary, vol. 32(1), pages 103-121, June.
- Kenneth Armstrong & Iain Begg & Jonathan Zeitlin, 2008. "JCMS Symposium: EU Governance After Lisbon," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46, pages 413-450, 03.
- Destefanis, Sergio & Mastromatteo, Giuseppe, 2012. "Assessing the reassessment: A panel analysis of the Lisbon Strategy," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 148-151.
- António Brandão Moniz, 2011. "From the Lisbon strategy to EU2020: illusion or progress for european economies?," IET Working Papers Series 01/2011, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, IET/CESNOVA-Research on Enterprise and Work Innovation, Faculty of Science and Technology.
- Johansson, Börje & Karlsson, Charlie & Backman, Mikaela & Juusola, Pia, 2007. "The Lisbon Agenda From 2000 To 2010," Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation 106, Royal Institute of Technology, CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies.
- repec:nsr:niesrd:312 is not listed on IDEAS
- Jean-Claude BARBIER, 2012. "Tracing the fate of EU “social policy”: Changes in political discourse from the “Lisbon Strategy” to “Europe 2020”," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 151(4), pages 377-399, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gdk:wpaper:16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wojciech Drapinski)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.