IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/fpr/ifprid/2107.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Assessing the development impacts of bio-innovations: The case of genetically modified maize and cassava in Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Benfica, Rui
  • Zambrano, Patricia
  • Chambers, Judith A.
  • Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin

Abstract

Tanzania’s agriculture faces persistent low crop productivity due to endogenous and exogenous factors, particularly low and unpredictable rainfall, and the incidence of pests. To address these challenges, the government and partners are making efforts to develop and deploy Genetically Modified (GM) Maize varieties with drought tolerance and insect resistant traits (WEMA), and Cassava Brown Streak Disease (CBSD) resistant varieties. This analysis overcomes limitations from earlier assessments of the impacts of those GM crops by accounting for trade-offs in resource competition and considering the indirect effects of adoption and yield gains from GM maize and cassava varieties on the broader economy, the Agri-Food System (AFS), and on household level outcomes. It extends the BioRAPP analysis to an ex-ante economywide framework. We reveal several findings. First, GM maize and cassava (individually and jointly) have positive impacts in the economy, the AFS, and the poverty, particularly in rural areas and among the poorest households. Second, given its relatively greater relevance in output and employment, and the stronger linkages in the AFS, the effects of GM maize on GDP and AFS growth, and poverty is relatively stronger than those from GM cassava. Third, as expected, relatively greater effects are found in higher adoption and high yield gains scenarios, and, in each scenario, the effects on the poorest households are greater than that for the higher quintiles. Furthermore, differential impact across scenarios is also greater amongst the poorest, while the differences are minimal for the top quintile. Finally, the high variation of results across scenarios, and the significant effects of the high adoption/high yield change scenario, suggest that efforts will be critical to ensure the realization of the maximization of adoption rates while ensuring the materialization of the yield growth potential of the GM varieties through the efficient use of technical recommendations on crop production management, and the introduction of the right investments and policy incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Benfica, Rui & Zambrano, Patricia & Chambers, Judith A. & Falck-Zepeda, José Benjamin, 2022. "Assessing the development impacts of bio-innovations: The case of genetically modified maize and cassava in Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 2107, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/140838
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zambrano, Patricia & Paul, Namita & Chambers, Judith A. & Falck-Zepeda, José B. & Hanson, Hillary, 2019. "bEcon 4 Africa: An overview of the literature on the economic assessment of GE crops in the continent, 1996-2016," IFPRI discussion papers 1841, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Sulser, Timothy & Wiebe, Keith D. & Dunston, Shahnila & Cenacchi, Nicola & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Mason-D’Croz, Daniel & Robertson, Richard D. & Willenbockel, Dirk & Rosegrant, Mark W., 2021. "Climate change and hunger: Estimating costs of adaptation in the agrifood system," Food policy reports 9780896294165, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stads, Gert-Jan & Wiebe, Keith D. & Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Sulser, Timothy B. & Benfica, Rui & Reda, Fasil & Khetarpal, Ravi, 2022. "Research for the future: Investments for efficiency, sustainability, and equity," IFPRI book chapters, in: 2022 Global food policy report: Climate change and food systems, chapter 4, pages 38-47, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Chen Chen & Koralai Kirabaeva & Danchen Zhao, 2024. "Investing in Climate Adaptation under Trade and Financing Constraints: Balanced Strategies for Food Security," IMF Working Papers 2024/184, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Robinson, Sherman & Dunston, Shahnila & Mishra, Abhijeet & Sulser, Timothy B. & Mason-D’Croz, Daniel & Robertson, Richard D. & Cenacchi, Nicola & Thomas, Timothy S. & Zhu, Tingju & Gueneau, Arthur & P, 2024. "The International Model for Policy Analysis of Agricultural Commodities and Trade (IMPACT): Model documentation for version 3.6," Research reports 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Herrero, Mario & Kugler, Cody & Remans, Rosaline & Thornton, Philip K. & Zornetzer, Heather, 2025. "What do we know about the future of food systems innovation?," IFPRI book chapters, in: What do we know about the future of food systems?, chapter 12, pages p. 64-72, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Bryan, Elizabeth & Thomas, Timothy S. & Wiebe, Keith D., 2025. "Climate change: Understanding impacts on agrifood systems and evaluating policy options," IFPRI book chapters, in: Global food policy report 2025: Food policy: Lessons and priorities for a changing world, chapter 4, pages 75-106, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Sajid, Osama & Ifft, Jennifer & Ortiz-Bobea, Ariel, 2023. "The impact of extreme weather on farm finance - evidence from Kansas," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335443, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. repec:ags:aaea22:335443 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Nin-Pratt, Alejandro & Beveridge, Malcolm C. M. & Sulser, Timothy B. & Marwaha, Nisha & Stanley, Michele & Grisenthwaite, Robert & Phillips, Michael J., 2022. "Cattle, seaweed, and global greenhouse gas emissions," IFPRI discussion papers 2111, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Daniel El Chami & Raffaella Santagata & Stefania Moretti & Luca Moreschi & Adriana Del Borghi & Michela Gallo, 2023. "A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Leah Costlow & Anna Herforth & Timothy B. Sulser & Nicola Cenacchi & William A. Masters, 2024. "Global analysis reveals persistent shortfalls and regional differences in availability of foods needed for health," Papers 2401.01080, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    11. von Braun, Joachim & Beyene Chichaibelu, Bezawit & Laborde, David & Torero Cullen, Maximo, 2024. "Cost of Ending Hunger – Consequences of Complacency, and Financial Needs for SDG2 Achievement," Discussion Papers 343159, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    12. Díaz-Bonilla, Eugenio & Echeverria, Ruben G., 2022. "Climate finance: Funding sustainable food systems transformation," IFPRI book chapters, in: 2022 Global food policy report: Climate change and food systems, chapter 5, pages 48-57, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprid:2107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.