Estimates and implications of the costs of compliance with biosafety regulations for African agriculture
In: Genetically modified crops in Africa: Economic and policy lessons from countries south of the Sahara
Modern biotechnology needs to be a part of the tools used for effective povÂ¬erty alleviation in Africa. As GE crops and other products are regulated products, it is imperative to establish regulatory systems that are commenÂ¬surate with the potential risk of the technology. These systems should be not only flexible enough to adapt to gains in knowledge and experience, but also transparent and fair, and take into consideration all aspects of a broad and inclusive decisionmaking process. Biosafety systems that are too cumÂ¬bersome or inflexible and those that become an insurmountable hurdle will stop this technology in its tracks, even those that have an elevated potential to resolve specific productivity issues of African agriculture. Biosafety thus becomes a process that considers all costs, benefits, and risks of prospective technologies within the scope of overall sustainable agricultural and ecoÂ¬nomic development.
|This chapter was published in: ||This item is provided by International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) in its series IFPRI book chapters with number
9780896297951-06.||Handle:|| RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9780896297951-06||Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.ifpri.org/Email:
More information through EDIRC
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Yorobe, Jose M., Jr. & Manalo, Abraham & Ramon, Godfrey & Amirsuhin, Bahagiawati & Lokollo, Erna M. & Zambrano, Patricia, 2007. "The Cost of Compliance with Biosafety Regulations in Indonesia and The Philippines," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 9947, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Odhiambo, Benjamin & Bergvinson, David & Mugo, Stephen & De Groote, Hugo, 2004. "Debunking The Myths Of Gm Crops For Africa: The Case Of Bt Maize In Kenya," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19918, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
- Smale, Melinda & Zambrano, Patricia & Gruère, Guillaume & Falck-Zepeda, José & Matuschke, Ira & Horna, Daniela & Nagarajan, Latha & Yerramareddy, Indira & Jones, Hannah, 2009. "Measuring the economic impacts of transgenic crops in developing agriculture during the first decade: Approaches, findings, and future directions," Food policy reviews 10, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Morgenstern, Richard & Harrington, Winston & Nelson, Per-Kristian, 1999. "On the Accuracy of Regulatory Cost Estimates," Discussion Papers dp-99-18, Resources For the Future.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifpric:9780896297951-06. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.