IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/exc/wpaper/2026-02.html

Does Burnout hurt Performance? Experimental Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Charles N. Noussair
  • Tauhidur Rahman

Abstract

Burnout is a phenomenon that has received significant attention in the past several decades, with meta-analyses emphasizing its adverse consequences for performance. However, a major limitation of the current literature is that it is exclusively correlational. In this study, we conduct a laboratory experiment to acquire the first causal evidence regarding the effect of burnout on performance. We study the performance of students on a standardized test. In the treatment group, burnout is induced with a recall task, while in the control group it is not. The data show that inducing burnout improves performance on the test. At the same time, we do replicate the commonly observed negative correlation between burnout and performance. Together, these results suggest that the observed correlation is driven by the effect of poor performance on feelings of burnout. We conjecture that feelings of burnout are a reaction that serves to partially offset poor performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles N. Noussair & Tauhidur Rahman, 2026. "Does Burnout hurt Performance? Experimental Evidence," Experimental Economics Center Working Paper Series 2026-02, Experimental Economics Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
  • Handle: RePEc:exc:wpaper:2026-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://excen.gsu.edu/workingpapers/GSU_EXCEN_WP_2026-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C9 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:exc:wpaper:2026-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: J. Todd Swarthout (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/exgsuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.