IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ces/ceswps/_11468.html

An Unconsidered Leave? Inequality Aversion and the Brexit Referendum

Author

Listed:
  • Joan Costa-Font
  • Frank Cowell
  • Joan Costa-i-Font

Abstract

This paper examines a behavioural explanation for the Brexit referendum result, the role of an individual’s inequality aversion (IA). We study whether the referendum result was an “unconsidered Leave” partially driven by people’s low aversion to inequality. We use a representative sample of the UK population fielded in 2017, and analyse the extent to which lottery-based individual IA estimates predict their Brexit vote. We consider alternative potential drivers of IA in both income and health domains; these include risk aversion, locus of control, alongside socio-economic and demographic characteristics. A greater aversion to income inequality predicts a lower probability of voting for Leave, even when controlling for risk aversion and other drivers of the Brexit vote. This effect is only true among men, for whom an increase in income IA by one standard deviation decreases their likelihood of voting for leaving the EU by 5% on average. Had there been a greater IA, the overall referendum result might have been different. However, the effect of health inequality aversion is not significantly different from zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Joan Costa-Font & Frank Cowell & Joan Costa-i-Font, 2024. "An Unconsidered Leave? Inequality Aversion and the Brexit Referendum," CESifo Working Paper Series 11468, CESifo.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/cesifo1_wp11468.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Joan Costa-Font & Frank Cowell, 2025. "Specific egalitarianism? Inequality aversion across domains," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 23(3), pages 749-775, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H10 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ceswps:_11468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.