IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/19-02.html

Predictive Analytics and Organizational Architecture: Plant-Level Evidence from Census Data

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Labro
  • Mark Lang
  • Jim Omartian

Abstract

We examine trends in the use of predictive analytics for a sample of more than 25,000 manufacturing plants using proprietary data from the US Census Bureau. Comparing 2010 and 2015, we find that use of predictive analytics has increased markedly, with the greatest use in younger plants, professionally-managed firms, more educated workforces, and stable industries. Decisions on data to be gathered originate from headquarters and are associated with less delegation of decision-making and more widespread awareness of quantitative targets among plant employees. Performance targets become more accurate, long-term oriented, and linked to company-wide performance, and management incentives strengthen, both in terms of monetary bonuses and career outcomes. Plants increasing predictive analytics become more efficient, with lower inventory, increased volume of shipments, narrower product mix, reduced management payroll and increased use of flexible and temporary employees. Results are robust to a specification based on increased government demand for data.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Labro & Mark Lang & Jim Omartian, 2019. "Predictive Analytics and Organizational Architecture: Plant-Level Evidence from Census Data," Working Papers 19-02, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    • Handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:19-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.census.gov/ces/wp/2019/CES-WP-19-02.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2019
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    2. Dennis Campbell, 2008. "Nonfinancial Performance Measures and Promotion‐Based Incentives," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(2), pages 297-332, May.
    3. Kalyan Singhal & Qi Feng & Ram Ganeshan & Nada R. Sanders & J. George Shanthikumar, 2018. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Perspectives on Big Data," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1639-1641, September.
    4. James Brickley & Clifford Smith & Jerold Zimmerman, 2020. "The Economics of Organizational Architecture," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 32(1), pages 108-119, March.
    5. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(12), pages 1984-1985, December.
    6. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(11), pages 1835-1836, November.
    7. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(10), pages 1671-1672, October.
    8. Ittner, Christopher D. & Larcker, David F., 2001. "Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: a value-based management perspective," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1-3), pages 349-410, December.
    9. Aghion, Philippe & Tirole, Jean, 1997. "Formal and Real Authority in Organizations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 105(1), pages 1-29, February.
    10. Erik Brynjolfsson & Kristina McElheran, 2016. "The Rapid Adoption of Data-Driven Decision-Making," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 133-139, May.
    11. Ruomeng Cui & Santiago Gallino & Antonio Moreno & Dennis J. Zhang, 2018. "The Operational Value of Social Media Information," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(10), pages 1749-1769, October.
    12. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(5), pages 852-853, May.
    13. Samayita Guha & Subodha Kumar, 2018. "Emergence of Big Data Research in Operations Management, Information Systems, and Healthcare: Past Contributions and Future Roadmap," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1724-1735, September.
    14. Jan Bouwens & Peter Kroos, 2017. "The Interplay Between Forward-Looking Measures and Target Setting," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(9), pages 2868-2884, September.
    15. Furnham, Adrian & Boo, Hua Chu, 2011. "A literature review of the anchoring effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-42, February.
    16. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1371-1372, August.
    17. Charles J. Corbett, 2018. "How Sustainable Is Big Data?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(9), pages 1685-1695, September.
    18. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    19. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(7), pages 1193-1194, July.
    20. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(4), pages 681-682, April.
    21. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2018. "Big Data in Supply Chain Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 27(10), pages 1745-1748, October.
    22. Canice Prendergast, 2002. "The Tenuous Trade-off between Risk and Incentives," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 110(5), pages 1071-1102, October.
    23. Hofmann, Christian & Indjejikian, Raffi J., 2018. "Authority and Accountability in Hierarchies," Foundations and Trends(R) in Accounting, now publishers, vol. 12(4), pages 298–403-2, December.
    24. Bushman, RM & Indjejikian, RJ & Smith, A, 1995. "Aggregate performance measures in business unit manager compensation: The role of intrafirm interdependencies," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33, pages 101-128.
    25. Eyring, Henry & Narayanan, V.G., 2018. "Performance effects of setting a high reference point for peer-performance comparison," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 86732, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    26. Nada R. Sanders & Ram Ganeshan, 2015. "Special Issue of Production and Operations Management on “Big Data in Supply Chain Management”," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(9), pages 1509-1510, September.
    27. Timothy F. Bresnahan & Erik Brynjolfsson & Lorin M. Hitt, 2002. "Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(1), pages 339-376.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eric W. K. See-To & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2018. "Customer reviews for demand distribution and sales nowcasting: a big data approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 415-431, November.
    2. Samuel Fosso Wamba & Angappa Gunasekaran & Rameshwar Dubey & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2018. "Big data analytics in operations and supply chain management," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 1-4, November.
    3. Deepa Mishra & Angappa Gunasekaran & Thanos Papadopoulos & Stephen J. Childe, 2018. "Big Data and supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 270(1), pages 313-336, November.
    4. Labro, Eva & Lang, Mark & Omartian, James D., 2023. "Predictive analytics and centralization of authority," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1).
    5. Xiangyu Chang & Yinghui Huang & Mei Li & Xin Bo & Subodha Kumar, 2021. "Efficient Detection of Environmental Violators: A Big Data Approach," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(5), pages 1246-1270, May.
    6. Morgan Swink & Kejia Hu & Xiande Zhao, 2022. "Analytics applications, limitations, and opportunities in restaurant supply chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(10), pages 3710-3726, October.
    7. Lidong Wang & Cheryl Ann Alexander, 2015. "Big Data Driven Supply Chain Management and Business Administration," American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, Science Publications, vol. 7(2), pages 60-67, June.
    8. Bryan Hong & Lorenz Kueng & Mu-Jeung Yang, 2015. "Estimating Management Practice Complementarity between Decentralization and Performance Pay," NBER Working Papers 20845, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Yang, Hefan & Liu, Xilu & Meng, Yao & Feng, Baoyi & Chen, Zhijun, 2024. "Digital transformation and the allocation of decision-making rights within business groups – Empirical evidence from China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Nicholas Bloom & Luis Garicano & Raffaella Sadun & John Van Reenen, 2014. "The Distinct Effects of Information Technology and Communication Technology on Firm Organization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(12), pages 2859-2885, December.
    11. Viete, Steffen & Erdsiek, Daniel, 2020. "Mobile Information Technologies and Firm Performance: The Role of Employee Autonomy," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    12. Catherine Thomas, 2011. "Too Many Products: Decentralized Decision Making in Multinational Firms," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 280-306, February.
    13. Bryan Hong & Lorenz Kueng & Mu-Jeung Yang, 2019. "Complementarity of Performance Pay and Task Allocation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(11), pages 5152-5170, November.
    14. Daron Acemoglu & Philippe Aghion & Claire Lelarge & John Van Reenen & Fabrizio Zilibotti, 2007. "Technology, Information, and the Decentralization of the Firm," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(4), pages 1759-1799.
    15. Sauro Mocetti & Marcello Pagnini & Enrico Sette, 2017. "Information Technology and Banking Organization," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 51(3), pages 313-338, June.
    16. Jan Bouwens & Laurence Van Lent, 2007. "Assessing the Performance of Business Unit Managers," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 45(4), pages 667-697, September.
    17. Ernesto Dal Bó & Frederico Finan & Nicholas Y. Li & Laura Schechter, 2021. "Information Technology and Government Decentralization: Experimental Evidence From Paraguay," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(2), pages 677-701, March.
    18. Luis Garicano & Richard A. Posner, 2005. "Intelligence Failures: An Organizational Economics Perspective," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 151-170, Fall.
    19. Elisa Gerten & Michael Beckmann & Elisa Gerten & Matthias Kräkel, 2022. "Information and Communication Technology, Hierarchy, and Job Design," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 189, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    20. Phillipe Aghion & Nicholas Bloom & John Van Reenen, 2014. "Incomplete Contracts and the Internal Organization of Firms," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 30(suppl_1), pages 37-63.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cen:wpaper:19-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dawn Anderson (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.